A couple WA waterfalls

This is lower Twin Falls on the South Fork of the Snoqualmie River

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Love the 2nd shot. First would be good for me if shadows were opened slightly.

sparker1 wrote in post #12461902
Love the 2nd shot. First would be good for me if shadows were opened slightly.

Thanks

I tried a little to open them up a bit, not much there. I'll have to go back there and try under better conditions (this is from a small viewing platform, about 8 square feet, and I got invaded by about dozen 7-9 year old cub scouts that hadn't been tired out by the hike)

Arghh, it says photos are currently unavailable, was looking forward to seeing some waterfall shots

SamuelBurns wrote in post #12475628
Arghh, it says photos are currently unavailable, was looking forward to seeing some waterfall shots

I don't know why it does that, I've seen it on other posts too. These were visible just a little while ago and they are still linked. Yet another internet mystery

Yeah... Flickr is known to do this quite often. Not as bad as Photobucket though.

Bad Habit wrote in post #12475608
Thanks

I tried a little to open them up a bit, not much there. I'll have to go back there and try under better conditions (this is from a small viewing platform, about 8 square feet, and I got invaded by about dozen 7-9 year old cub scouts that hadn't been tired out by the hike)

Looks better to me now.

I prefer the second, if you can pull up the shadows (as mentioned) and kill the bright area. The first has blown out water, and the third could have benefited from the use of a polarizer to kill the glare on the wet rocks.

Apparently Flickr randomly makes images unavailable because I can't see any of them.

argyle wrote in post #12483664
I prefer the second, if you can pull up the shadows (as mentioned) and kill the bright area. The first has blown out water, and the third could have benefited from the use of a polarizer to kill the glare on the wet rocks.

I redid some of the PP on the 1 & 2, I agree they are better now. I actually did have CP on the 3rd one but I guess I didn't have it orientated right. It was tough to see any discernable difference as I was adjusting. Probably comes down to being more deliberate with setting up and evaluating the shots before I press the button.

Every shot and PP is a learning experiance, just need to make sure I pay attention to the lessons