Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 23 May 2011 (Monday) 08:41
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Dark, DARK Exits?

 
jcolman
Goldmember
2,668 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 696
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
May 24, 2011 11:44 |  #16

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #12469862 (external link)
Very nice shot! I seem to be missing something, tho, on this method, along with some of the other images, which seem to have much more ambient light (at lease behind the subjects) than the situation we faced-- and that is how to get the focus on the subjects in the first place before your flashes go off. My first mistake, I see now, was using my 70-200 at a wide f-stop. Reckon if I'd had my 35 on at a higher f-stop it would've helped a lot.

Set your focus to your back (*) button instead of the shutter. You will thank me. Also, setting your f/stop to a higher number, while giving you more depth of field, will severely cut down on your ambient light. I often shoot these shots at f/2.8 (or lower if I use my 35L) just so I can bring in the ambient light.


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christina
Senior Member
Avatar
633 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
     
May 24, 2011 12:29 |  #17

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #12469862 (external link)
Very nice shot! I seem to be missing something, tho, on this method, along with some of the other images, which seem to have much more ambient light (at lease behind the subjects) than the situation we faced-- and that is how to get the focus on the subjects in the first place before your flashes go off. My first mistake, I see now, was using my 70-200 at a wide f-stop. Reckon if I'd had my 35 on at a higher f-stop it would've helped a lot.

This is where the hyperfocal distance thing comes in. Look at your lens and look at what the biggest number is in distance. I'd pick the lens with the smallest number - for me, it's the 16-35, because its hyperfocal distance is 3 feet. On the 50mm, it's 10 feet. Let's say you pick the 50mm. Focus on something that is more than 10 feet away from you. That will set your focus at that infinity point - so then anything that you shoot that is 10 feet away or more will be in focus. There is no need to focus again after that... as long as your subjects don't get close than 10 feet. I would want to be closer, which is why I like the 16-35.

This is how I do all my dancing shots. I set the focus, use f4 or f5.6, and as long as I'm 3 feet away, I get sharp dancing photos.

To get all that ambient light, use your highest ISO and slowest shutter speed. You can also boost your flash exposure compensation a bit and use a slower shutter than you would normally and get some motion blur, but your flash will freeze your subjects.


Christina - Pittsburgh Wedding Photographer (external link)
Syncopated Pictures (external link)
http://christinamontem​urrophotography.com/bl​og/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
May 24, 2011 12:33 |  #18

No, I do already use back button focusing, so that wasn't my issue. So you will use a wide f-stop on your wide angle? I thought you were saying that my 70-200 wasn't a good choice b/c I was using it at f2.8 but you just meant the lens itself wasn't the best choice, right?

jcolman wrote in post #12470006 (external link)
Set your focus to your back (*) button instead of the shutter. You will thank me. Also, setting your f/stop to a higher number, while giving you more depth of field, will severely cut down on your ambient light. I often shoot these shots at f/2.8 (or lower if I use my 35L) just so I can bring in the ambient light.


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
May 24, 2011 12:35 |  #19

This is a great expalantion of how to do this, Christina, thank you!

Christina wrote in post #12470293 (external link)
This is where the hyperfocal distance thing comes in. Look at your lens and look at what the biggest number is in distance. I'd pick the lens with the smallest number - for me, it's the 16-35, because its hyperfocal distance is 3 feet. On the 50mm, it's 10 feet. Let's say you pick the 50mm. Focus on something that is more than 10 feet away from you. That will set your focus at that infinity point - so then anything that you shoot that is 10 feet away or more will be in focus. There is no need to focus again after that... as long as your subjects don't get close than 10 feet. I would want to be closer, which is why I like the 16-35.

This is how I do all my dancing shots. I set the focus, use f4 or f5.6, and as long as I'm 3 feet away, I get sharp dancing photos.

To get all that ambient light, use your highest ISO and slowest shutter speed. You can also boost your flash exposure compensation a bit and use a slower shutter than you would normally and get some motion blur, but your flash will freeze your subjects.


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
May 24, 2011 14:34 |  #20

580EX on-camera AF assist helps AF lock in low light (only one-shot mode).


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,668 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 696
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
May 24, 2011 15:24 |  #21

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #12470324 (external link)
No, I do already use back button focusing, so that wasn't my issue. So you will use a wide f-stop on your wide angle? I thought you were saying that my 70-200 wasn't a good choice b/c I was using it at f2.8 but you just meant the lens itself wasn't the best choice, right?

Yes, in my opinion, the 70-200 is too long a lens for nighttime exit shots as your DOF is going to be pretty narrow. Shooting at f/2.8 at 70mm is a lot harder than shooting at f/2.8 at 16mm as far as nailing focus in the dark on a moving subject.


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
emdzey01
Senior Member
349 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2008
Location: SoCal
     
May 24, 2011 18:23 |  #22

i dont see how the AF-assist beam of the ST-E2 or any of Canon's shoe-mounted flash would help in this situation, as you will need to be in AI SERVO to keep the lens's focus moving.

I agree with trying a shorter FL, stopping down for more DOF. i'd also like to add that you may want to try and focus on a predetermined spot in their path and snap when they step in.


my name is mjay.

Click for my transactions as a seller on POTN

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
form
"inadequately equipped"
Avatar
4,929 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Henderson, NV
     
May 24, 2011 19:58 |  #23

Many people successfully use One Shot mode for processionals, so I do not see why it would not work for exits.


Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenph​oto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,668 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 696
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
May 24, 2011 21:01 |  #24

emdzey01 wrote in post #12472197 (external link)
i dont see how the AF-assist beam of the ST-E2 or any of Canon's shoe-mounted flash would help in this situation, as you will need to be in AI SERVO to keep the lens's focus moving.

I agree with trying a shorter FL, stopping down for more DOF. i'd also like to add that you may want to try and focus on a predetermined spot in their path and snap when they step in.

If you are walking backwards with the B&G then one shot mode works ok most of the time. The biggest issue however for using AI SERVO mode is having enough light for the camera to lock focus. At least in one shot mode you can use the AF-assist.


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
May 25, 2011 10:31 |  #25

So...I'm a little confused as the whether it is best to use One Shot or AI Servo mode...I assumed AI Servo and keep the back button pressed once focus was acheived...

On the statement about the issue using AI Servo not having enough light to focus...is this why my husband's 7D won't fire at all if he hasn't achieved focus? I never use his, so I'm not sure if he's correct or not, but that's what he tells me.


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,668 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 696
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
May 25, 2011 12:08 |  #26

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #12476184 (external link)
So...I'm a little confused as the whether it is best to use One Shot or AI Servo mode...I assumed AI Servo and keep the back button pressed once focus was acheived...

On the statement about the issue using AI Servo not having enough light to focus...is this why my husband's 7D won't fire at all if he hasn't achieved focus? I never use his, so I'm not sure if he's correct or not, but that's what he tells me.

Use one shot mode IF you are using your flash focus assist. Flash focus assist doesn't work in AI servo mode.

There is probably a custom function that is set on your husbands 7D to prevent it from firing if it doesn't lock focus. You can change it.


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Christina
Senior Member
Avatar
633 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Pittsburgh
     
May 25, 2011 12:48 |  #27

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #12470324 (external link)
No, I do already use back button focusing, so that wasn't my issue. So you will use a wide f-stop on your wide angle? I thought you were saying that my 70-200 wasn't a good choice b/c I was using it at f2.8 but you just meant the lens itself wasn't the best choice, right?

It may be helpful to check out a DOF calculator, too, like this one:
http://www.dofmaster.c​om/dofjs.html (external link)

If you put in the f-stop and distance for, say, 35mm and then 200mm, watch how the range of DOF changes.
At f2.8, subject 6 feet away, your range of DOF at 16mm is 11.3 ft
At f2.8, subject 6 feet away, your range of DOF at 35mm is 1.51 ft.
At f2.8, subject 6 feet away, your range of DOF at 70mm is 0.37 ft.
At f2.8, subject 6 feet away, your range of DOF at 200mm is 0.04 ft.


Christina - Pittsburgh Wedding Photographer (external link)
Syncopated Pictures (external link)
http://christinamontem​urrophotography.com/bl​og/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,025 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Dark, DARK Exits?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1555 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.