Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 23 May 2011 (Monday) 18:21
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

So the S95, maybe i was expecting a little more?

 
amairphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,052 posts
Gallery: 69 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 4587
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
     
May 23, 2011 18:21 |  #1

I used to have the sd850 which i thought was an amazing point n shoot. I havent used a point n shoot for a while and recently got the s95. I have been playing around with it for a while now and just took it to the grand canyon, i dont know if im crazy about it.
I took these ages ago with my sd850

https://photography-on-the.net …p?t=523145&high​light=zion and i feel theyre better than the S95,

Am i crazy or expecting too much?

EDIT:

i think i take it back i have had a little play around with some images i have taken and i am happy wit hit, see below post from me to see pics


My Website: http://www.amairphoto.​com (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
May 23, 2011 19:00 |  #2

Checked out this thread or maybe this one? Don't try to use it as a "PhD" camera; treat it with the same respect you would your 5D2.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
May 23, 2011 20:27 |  #3

Hard to say without any similar samples from your s95 as comparisons.

It is always easy to reminisce about old cameras, but you usually don't have all your crap shots around as comparisons, only the really good ones.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tmwag
Brown Noser has crush on Suzyview
Avatar
2,641 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Kansas City
     
May 23, 2011 20:30 |  #4

DonJuanMair wrote in post #12465765 (external link)
I used to have the sd850 which i thought was an amazing point n shoot. I havent used a point n shoot for a while and recently got the s95. I have been playing around with it for a while now and just took it to the grand canyon.


https://photography-on-the.net …p?t=523145&high​light=zion and i feel theyre better than the S95,

Am i crazy or expecting too much?

I see 850 shots...have any S95 shots for comparison




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amairphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,052 posts
Gallery: 69 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 4587
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
     
May 23, 2011 23:25 |  #5

heres a couple shots i have taken the time to edit, i guess its ok :p

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


although i must say that the blacks dont seem to be very black.....i had to tweak those pics a lot and why when i have it in AV mode at night does it always underexpose?

My Website: http://www.amairphoto.​com (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
May 25, 2011 13:08 |  #6

DonJuanMair wrote in post #12467376 (external link)
heres a couple shots i have taken the time to edit, i guess its ok :p
although i must say that the blacks dont seem to be very black.....i had to tweak those pics a lot and why when i have it in AV mode at night does it always underexpose?

Can you make a TIFF then jpeg of the untweaked RAW shots? That might help?


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
starlights
Senior Member
Avatar
661 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 134
Joined Apr 2011
     
May 25, 2011 17:40 |  #7

Some recent ones from S95 - on the contrary, i think its a Brilliant little Camera! It goes where other cameras dont - and yet gives a lot of manual control!

https://photography-on-the.net …p=12476216&post​count=1083




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amairphoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,052 posts
Gallery: 69 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 4587
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
     
May 25, 2011 18:37 |  #8

i will do that later the tif thing yeah so you can see.

starlights beautiful, although you are on a beach in paradise that always helps :p


My Website: http://www.amairphoto.​com (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
starlights
Senior Member
Avatar
661 posts
Gallery: 16 photos
Likes: 134
Joined Apr 2011
     
May 26, 2011 10:22 |  #9

DonJuanMair wrote in post #12479041 (external link)
i will do that later the tif thing yeah so you can see.

starlights beautiful, although you are on a beach in paradise that always helps :p


Thanks Don. Yes ofcourse - as the saying goes, garbage in garbage out :) so if the lighting / subject isnt image worthy, either you dont get a great image, or you have to work it to apparently improve one of those via prespective / lighting etc.....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,659 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
So the S95, maybe i was expecting a little more?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1006 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.