Well B&H can't do anything for me...now debating two options...send it Canon for the 5th time...or sell everything and go Nikon(I'm seriously mad enough to do this).
May 24, 2011 08:23 | #16 Well B&H can't do anything for me...now debating two options...send it Canon for the 5th time...or sell everything and go Nikon(I'm seriously mad enough to do this). Please visit my Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewK Cream of the Crop More info | May 24, 2011 08:38 | #17 OP, this is a depressing report
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alt4852 Goldmember 3,419 posts Likes: 1 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Northern Virginia More info | i wonder how common this problem is. i'm no statistician, but four different lenses in a row that don't work properly, and the last one failing to be repaired after five calibrations doesn't sound like poor service.. it's either a defective design or you have the worst luck possible with it comes to lens purchases. 5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 24, 2011 09:00 | #19 alt4852 wrote in post #12468946 i wonder how common this problem is. i'm no statistician, but four different lenses in a row that don't work properly, and the last one failing to be repaired after five calibrations doesn't sound like poor service.. it's either a defective design or you have the worst luck possible with it comes to lens purchases. I agree, as an engineer I believe it is a poor design on Canon's part. What's amazing to me is there is no recognition of this issue. I'm sure they've had other returns come back again and again, we've had at least a couple on this forum...yet they act like all is fine and good in the land of F1.4. Please visit my Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alpha_1976 Goldmember 3,961 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: USA More info | May 24, 2011 09:03 | #20 Sdiver2489 wrote in post #12469062 I agree, as an engineer I believe it is a poor design on Canon's part. What's amazing to me is there is no recognition of this issue. I'm sure they've had other returns come back again and again, we've had at least a couple on this forum...yet they act like all is fine and good in the land of F1.4. How old is the lens? I know more about gear than I know about photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 24, 2011 09:07 | #21 alpha_1976 wrote in post #12469086 How old is the lens? The one I currently have? I bought it from B&H at the end of Feb 2011. Please visit my Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
alpha_1976 Goldmember 3,961 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2009 Location: USA More info | May 24, 2011 09:08 | #22 Sdiver2489 wrote in post #12469113 The one I currently have? I bought it from B&H at the end of Feb 2011. I tried two; both were UY date coded and perfect. May be it's a bad batch/lot or something? I know more about gear than I know about photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hhuy888 Goldmember 1,002 posts Likes: 17 Joined Mar 2010 More info | May 24, 2011 11:40 | #23 Sdiver2489 wrote in post #12467723 Meant to mention that...each of the four times its gone to Canon...I've included my body with it. It may sound cliche...but seriously considering going to Nikon. Maybe they have a crazy expensive 24mm prime that works. I tried to look at your flickr photos to see the problems, but not sure where the problems were if you did not explain. hhuy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 24, 2011 13:12 | #24 hhuy888 wrote in post #12469987 I tried to look at your flickr photos to see the problems, but not sure where the problems were if you did not explain. I think it is best you find a hosting site for a few photos, then copy and paste them here, with detail infos (F stops, focus points,...) of how you took them and what the problems were. Not that i don't believe you, but we only hear the story from your side so far. Can you scan and post Canon comments on the lens when you received them back the last 4 times you sent to them? I think before you complain higher up or change to another camera brand (and find out every brands have strengths and weaknesses), maybe you should: 1. Try the lens with more different bodies. 2. Shoot real photos (not test) and share the infos with us of how you shoot them. 3. If you decide to send it in for the fifth time, maybe send to a different Canon SC and see if you have better result. Best of luck, The EXIF information is fully available on Flickr should you want it. Basically every image was taken with the center point, right most and left most. A few were taken with the topmost focus point and bottom. Most of the images are moderately to severly front focused. Please visit my Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 24, 2011 13:23 | #25 I made a brief comment on each photo to state what point was used and what was being focused on. Please visit my Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
40dbaby Senior Member 516 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2009 Location: socal More info | May 24, 2011 16:05 | #26 hhuy888 wrote in post #12469987 Not that i don't believe you, but we only hear the story from your side so far. Can you scan and post Canon comments on the lens when you received them back the last 4 times you sent to them? anyone who has sent in an item to canon to fix know that they dont exactly write essays on what was discovered/fixed. Only an untrained eye can appreciate the sharpness of a lens...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MatthewK Cream of the Crop More info | hhuy888 wrote in post #12469987 2. Shoot real photos (not test) and share the infos with us of how you shoot them. I posted some real shots from this lens in the thread that I made, which is the same exact problem as Sdiver is having: https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php?t=1041504 Sdiver2489 wrote in post #12470535 3. That is a possibility that may be explored. I did finally get a gentleman at Canon that is helping me. He is willing to take a look at these test shots and see the problem I am having. The issue is mostly front focusing...but problem is(even after the third trip back where most of the time it would focus ok) that its not consistent. Some images are severely front focused...others just a little bit. Towards the end of the test images a few are even in perfect focus. If its not consistent I can't fix it with MFA. Same here... you can't MFA a lens when it doesn't hit at a consistent point each time. In addition to extreme front-focusing, the lens simply smears detail at anything beyond mid-range.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 24, 2011 16:17 | #28 I would just keep after it. I had a similar experience with a defective MacBook pro. Took me 6 months but I got a new one with a free upgrade. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 24, 2011 16:18 | #29 40dbaby wrote in post #12471523 anyone who has sent in an item to canon to fix know that they dont exactly write essays on what was discovered/fixed. ![]() Exactly...I roll my eyes now each time I read it...each message is some variation of this: Please visit my Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
kylyo Senior Member 570 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Seattle, WA More info | Same problem with my two copies I tried (one used, one new) and my 7d. Fortunately I never sent my new one in so I sent it back to B&H; the used one I sold it for what I paid for it. Now I have the 35L and couldn't be happier...well I guess the weather sealing would be nice! 5d III | Canon 16-35L II | Canon 35L | Canon 70-200 II |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1057 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||