Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 24 May 2011 (Tuesday) 00:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Do not make the same mistake as me (24mm Odyssey)

 
Sdiver2489
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
May 24, 2011 08:23 |  #16

Well B&H can't do anything for me...now debating two options...send it Canon for the 5th time...or sell everything and go Nikon(I'm seriously mad enough to do this).


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
Cream of the Crop
5,290 posts
Gallery: 1093 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 16862
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
     
May 24, 2011 08:38 |  #17

OP, this is a depressing report :( My 24L returns from it's 2nd Canon trip this week, and if the problem isn't fixed, I honestly don't know what to do. Can't return it for a refund, no one will buy a defective, $1800 hunk of sh1t.

What's worse for me is that my lens is a refurb, meaning someone else was fortunate enough to recognize the issue and return the lens. If the problem turns out to be uncorrectable, then there is a 100% chance I am stuck with a lemon.

My thread on the issue: https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1041504




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alt4852
Goldmember
Avatar
3,419 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Northern Virginia
     
May 24, 2011 08:41 as a reply to  @ Sdiver2489's post |  #18

i wonder how common this problem is. i'm no statistician, but four different lenses in a row that don't work properly, and the last one failing to be repaired after five calibrations doesn't sound like poor service.. it's either a defective design or you have the worst luck possible with it comes to lens purchases.


5D4 | Z21 | 35L2 | 50L | 85L2 | 135L

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
May 24, 2011 09:00 |  #19

alt4852 wrote in post #12468946 (external link)
i wonder how common this problem is. i'm no statistician, but four different lenses in a row that don't work properly, and the last one failing to be repaired after five calibrations doesn't sound like poor service.. it's either a defective design or you have the worst luck possible with it comes to lens purchases.

I agree, as an engineer I believe it is a poor design on Canon's part. What's amazing to me is there is no recognition of this issue. I'm sure they've had other returns come back again and again, we've had at least a couple on this forum...yet they act like all is fine and good in the land of F1.4.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alpha_1976
Goldmember
Avatar
3,961 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: USA
     
May 24, 2011 09:03 |  #20

Sdiver2489 wrote in post #12469062 (external link)
I agree, as an engineer I believe it is a poor design on Canon's part. What's amazing to me is there is no recognition of this issue. I'm sure they've had other returns come back again and again, we've had at least a couple on this forum...yet they act like all is fine and good in the land of F1.4.

How old is the lens?


I know more about gear than I know about photography :p
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
May 24, 2011 09:07 |  #21

alpha_1976 wrote in post #12469086 (external link)
How old is the lens?

The one I currently have? I bought it from B&H at the end of Feb 2011.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alpha_1976
Goldmember
Avatar
3,961 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: USA
     
May 24, 2011 09:08 |  #22

Sdiver2489 wrote in post #12469113 (external link)
The one I currently have? I bought it from B&H at the end of Feb 2011.

I tried two; both were UY date coded and perfect. May be it's a bad batch/lot or something?


I know more about gear than I know about photography :p
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hhuy888
Goldmember
Avatar
1,002 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Mar 2010
     
May 24, 2011 11:40 |  #23

Sdiver2489 wrote in post #12467723 (external link)
Meant to mention that...each of the four times its gone to Canon...I've included my body with it.

It may sound cliche...but seriously considering going to Nikon. Maybe they have a crazy expensive 24mm prime that works.

I tried to look at your flickr photos to see the problems, but not sure where the problems were if you did not explain.
I think it is best you find a hosting site for a few photos, then copy and paste them here, with detail infos (F stops, focus points,...) of how you took them and what the problems were.

Not that i don't believe you, but we only hear the story from your side so far. Can you scan and post Canon comments on the lens when you received them back the last 4 times you sent to them?

I think before you complain higher up or change to another camera brand (and find out every brands have strengths and weaknesses), maybe you should:

1. Try the lens with more different bodies.

2. Shoot real photos (not test) and share the infos with us of how you shoot them.

3. If you decide to send it in for the fifth time, maybe send to a different Canon SC and see if you have better result.

Best of luck,


hhuy
_______________

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
May 24, 2011 13:12 |  #24

hhuy888 wrote in post #12469987 (external link)
I tried to look at your flickr photos to see the problems, but not sure where the problems were if you did not explain.
I think it is best you find a hosting site for a few photos, then copy and paste them here, with detail infos (F stops, focus points,...) of how you took them and what the problems were.

Not that i don't believe you, but we only hear the story from your side so far. Can you scan and post Canon comments on the lens when you received them back the last 4 times you sent to them?

I think before you complain higher up or change to another camera brand (and find out every brands have strengths and weaknesses), maybe you should:

1. Try the lens with more different bodies.

2. Shoot real photos (not test) and share the infos with us of how you shoot them.

3. If you decide to send it in for the fifth time, maybe send to a different Canon SC and see if you have better result.

Best of luck,

The EXIF information is fully available on Flickr should you want it. Basically every image was taken with the center point, right most and left most. A few were taken with the topmost focus point and bottom. Most of the images are moderately to severly front focused.

1. I would like to do that if I had another body to test it on. I have mentioned in this thread that I may try to take it to a camera shop and see if they'll let me put it on their body. My body works fine with all my other lenses leading me to believe the body has nothing wrong with it. It's been shipped back everytime with the lens anyway.

2. I'm not going to take the time to take "works of art" with a lens that doesn't focus correctly...that'd be a waste of my time.

3. That is a possibility that may be explored. I did finally get a gentleman at Canon that is helping me. He is willing to take a look at these test shots and see the problem I am having. The issue is mostly front focusing...but problem is(even after the third trip back where most of the time it would focus ok) that its not consistent. Some images are severely front focused...others just a little bit. Towards the end of the test images a few are even in perfect focus. If its not consistent I can't fix it with MFA.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
May 24, 2011 13:23 |  #25

I made a brief comment on each photo to state what point was used and what was being focused on.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
40dbaby
Senior Member
516 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2009
Location: socal
     
May 24, 2011 16:05 |  #26

hhuy888 wrote in post #12469987 (external link)
Not that i don't believe you, but we only hear the story from your side so far. Can you scan and post Canon comments on the lens when you received them back the last 4 times you sent to them?

anyone who has sent in an item to canon to fix know that they dont exactly write essays on what was discovered/fixed. :rolleyes:


Only an untrained eye can appreciate the sharpness of a lens...
5DII | Zeiss 50 MP | Sigmalux | 85 1.8 | 24-70L | 70-200L II | 100-400L | 580ex II | 430ex II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MatthewK
Cream of the Crop
5,290 posts
Gallery: 1093 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 16862
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Wisconsin
     
May 24, 2011 16:07 as a reply to  @ Sdiver2489's post |  #27

hhuy888 wrote in post #12469987 (external link)
2. Shoot real photos (not test) and share the infos with us of how you shoot them.

I posted some real shots from this lens in the thread that I made, which is the same exact problem as Sdiver is having: https://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1041504

Sdiver2489 wrote in post #12470535 (external link)
3. That is a possibility that may be explored. I did finally get a gentleman at Canon that is helping me. He is willing to take a look at these test shots and see the problem I am having. The issue is mostly front focusing...but problem is(even after the third trip back where most of the time it would focus ok) that its not consistent. Some images are severely front focused...others just a little bit. Towards the end of the test images a few are even in perfect focus. If its not consistent I can't fix it with MFA.

Same here... you can't MFA a lens when it doesn't hit at a consistent point each time. In addition to extreme front-focusing, the lens simply smears detail at anything beyond mid-range.

I get mine back tomorrow, let's see if a different CSC fixed the issues.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tommydigi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,916 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 844
Joined May 2010
Location: Chicago
     
May 24, 2011 16:17 |  #28

I would just keep after it. I had a similar experience with a defective MacBook pro. Took me 6 months but I got a new one with a free upgrade.

I don't know if this is just a bad lens design. Mine seems very sharp to me. I have lots of shots with it on my flickr


Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Fuji X100F • Canon EOS R6 Mark 2 • G7XII • RF 16 2.8 • RF 14-35 F4 L • RF 35 1.8 • RF 800 F11 • EF 24LII L • EF 50 L • EF 100 L • EF 135 L • EF 100-400 L II • 600EX II RT • 270 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sdiver2489
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
2,845 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 113
Joined Sep 2009
     
May 24, 2011 16:18 |  #29

40dbaby wrote in post #12471523 (external link)
anyone who has sent in an item to canon to fix know that they dont exactly write essays on what was discovered/fixed. :rolleyes:

Exactly...I roll my eyes now each time I read it...each message is some variation of this:

"Your camera was inspected and found that the AF was not working correctly. AF adjustments were made, CMOS reset, Firmware updated"

Amazing how each time I sent it in the AF wasn't working so they made adjustments...worthles​s description IMO.


Please visit my Flickr (external link) and leave a comment!

Gear:
Canon 5D III, Canon 24-70L F4 IS, Canon 70-300L F4-F5.6 IS, Canon 100mm F2.8L IS Macro, Canon 35mm F2.0 IS, Canon 430EX II-RT, Canon 600EX II-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kylyo
Senior Member
Avatar
570 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
     
May 24, 2011 16:39 as a reply to  @ post 12468708 |  #30

Same problem with my two copies I tried (one used, one new) and my 7d. Fortunately I never sent my new one in so I sent it back to B&H; the used one I sold it for what I paid for it. Now I have the 35L and couldn't be happier...well I guess the weather sealing would be nice!

I say just keep sending it in! Maybe at some point they will lose it and have to get you a new one :lol:


5d III | Canon 16-35L II | Canon 35L | Canon 70-200 II |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

14,303 views & 0 likes for this thread, 37 members have posted to it.
Do not make the same mistake as me (24mm Odyssey)
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1057 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.