Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 24 May 2011 (Tuesday) 06:47
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

An apology and clarification

 
Nicholas ­ R.
Senior Member
Avatar
455 posts
Joined Jan 2005
     
May 24, 2011 06:47 |  #1

As most of you know, there has been a video of a particular sensor cleaning method posted here several times. It was made by Roger C. of www.LensRentals.com (external link) and I have been as subtle with my criticism as a Milwaukee SawzAll. But after exchanging a few emails with Roger, I now realize that both of us are very close in our appoach to sensor cleaning.

I had no basis to doubt the number of sensors he has worked on, especially given the excellent reputation his rental business has on the internet and in the business. And I had no basis to question the success rate of his cleaning operations. As I explained here and to him personally, there are a gazillion sensor cleaning videos on YouTube with a gazillion experts hosting each one. The vast majority of them are total hogwash/BS with the sole purpose to sell the viewer a product or service and I simply lumped this particular one in with these pure farces. I firmly believe Roger has no such ulterior motive for his video. It is beautifully filmed and produced and he should be proud of it and I hope he accepts my apology for my excessive critique.

All of that being said, I now realize that our differences were trivial and even minuscule. Here are the 2 points:

1) When someone brings me a D-SLR to be cleaned, I first ask if it has ever been cleaned or when the last cleaning took place. If it was over 3 months prior, then there is a tremendous chance that there is lubricant on the sensor. This scenario inclines me to use a wet-method first to get this lube off. Roger's video is sort of reverse, but I now know that he doesn't shy away from wet-cleaning, he simply uses the dry tools first and the wet tools only when he deems necessary. I told him that this position could have been explained a little better, but, hey, it really is a minuscule point.

2) Adhesives - I have never liked them and will never like them and using them after a static brush still does seem redundant. But if it works for Roger's protocol, then who am I to argue with success? I think a tool that runs rings around adhesives is the SensorKlear; not only can it pick up loose dust, it can also dislodge semi-stuck on particles. Many professionals use the pen exclusively on their sensors. When I clean my sensor, I first do the methanol, then follow with a brush, if necessary, then follow with the SensorKlear around the edges, if neccesary again. The pen has a pointed tip which allows me to get right up to the sidewalls, it is a very precise instrument.

I hope this clarifies my position and I will strive mightily to make future discussions as amicable as possible.

Thanks for your time.
Nicholas
http://www.copperhilli​mages.com/index.php?pr​=galleries (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dmab
Goldmember
Avatar
1,259 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Mar 2008
Location: Wisconsin
     
May 24, 2011 08:55 |  #2

Nicholas R. wrote in post #12468541 (external link)
...

I hope this clarifies my position and I will strive mightily to make future discussions as amicable as possible. ...

That's good to hear.
To be so hardline on your opinions without regard for others is pretty juvenile, so I for one am glad you realize this.

Now let's see it in practice for future posts ;)


Dan
=======
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Roger ­ Cicala
Senior Member
Avatar
507 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
     
May 24, 2011 11:07 |  #3

I just want to chime in that after talking with Nicholas I realize we're seeing a different situation than most people: we inspect and clean sensors after every rental, so once a week or so. It makes sense that in that situation we can usually get by with blowing or brushing and leave wet cleaning as a reserve for the difficult sensors.

Looking at a camera's sensor every week or so it's likely that we get by with less intensive cleaning than most people who only clean their sensor when it needs it. That type of cleaning probably is going to be more intensive than our routine and far more likely to need more intensive help.

And please don't take me the wrong way: I'm not advocating cleaning weekly, we just have to because we never know which camera is going to come back filthy. On a difficult cleaning we use wet methods too, but cleaning so often we often don't have to. But I want to echo what Nicholas said, when we discussed it, we really are doing the same thing.


Roger


My gear is www.lensrentals.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
doc.paradox
Member
222 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
May 24, 2011 22:51 as a reply to  @ Roger Cicala's post |  #4

Hey Roger, . . it's always fun to see you stop by (I just gotta say this as a long time mono-satisfied customer) LensRentals.com Rocks!

ALSO: I have been laughing, learning, . . and just plain enjoying your brilliant essays for many moons, . . you sir, are truly "the photographers friend."

I have been especially enjoying your latest series on the history/development of photography ~ great story and (as always) GREAT story telling, . . Well done Sir, . . take a bow.

Sincerely,

Doc. Paradox




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,308 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
An apology and clarification
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1208 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.