Which ONE and ONLY one would it be?
(Of your current collection.)
SchnellerGT Senior Member 585 posts Joined Apr 2007 Location: Washington, DC More info | May 24, 2011 21:26 | #1 Which ONE and ONLY one would it be? Canon EOS 5D Mark II | Canon 24-70 2.8L II [FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2][FONT=Tahoma][SIZE=2][FONT=Tahoma]| Canon 40mm Pancake | Canon EF 85 1.8 USM | Canon EF 135 F2L USM | Canon Speedlite 430 EX
LOG IN TO REPLY |
S.Horton worship my useful and insightful comments  More info | May 24, 2011 21:27 | #2 Hmmmmmmmmmm. 100-400 I suppose. It gets the most use in general. Sam - TF Says Ishmael
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shedberg Goldmember  1,122 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Terrace, B.C. Canada More info | May 24, 2011 21:28 | #3 24-105 I guess... My Flickr Page
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Invertalon Cream of the Crop  6,495 posts Likes: 24 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Cleveland, OH More info | May 24, 2011 21:28 | #4 |
DaffodilHunter Goldmember  1,096 posts Likes: 656 Joined Nov 2006 More info | 70-200mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crn3371 Cream of the Crop  7,198 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: SoCal, USA More info | May 24, 2011 21:30 | #7 It would have to be my 100-400. While not my most practical lens it's he one I have the most fun with.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChrisC_75DS95 Member 103 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2011 More info | 70-200 f/2.8 IS II 5D3 G9 S95 EOS M
LOG IN TO REPLY |
timnosenzo Cream of the Crop 8,833 posts Likes: 14 Joined Sep 2005 Location: CT More info | May 24, 2011 21:32 | #9 |
ToddLambert I don't like titles  More info | May 24, 2011 21:32 | #10 16-35 or 24L one of the two... as far as usage is concerned.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
illusionest 5D MkII? CHECK!  932 posts Joined Mar 2007 Location: Toronto, Canada More info | May 24, 2011 21:34 | #11 24-105 in my lineup. would be different if i were full primes , though. Matthew Law
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Lifeinpictures Member 220 posts Joined Apr 2009 More info | May 24, 2011 21:37 | #12 24-70 2.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
godzakka Senior Member 353 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2007 Location: Jacksonville, FL More info | May 24, 2011 21:37 | #13 Tamron 17-50 (non-VC). Simple, small, light-weight, cheap, sharp... very happy with this lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Drozz119 Goldmember  1,340 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2008 Location: Pittsburgh, Pa More info | May 24, 2011 21:38 | #14 |
tancanon58 Senior Member  967 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2009 Location: southern california More info | May 24, 2011 21:40 | #15 ChrisC_75DS95 wrote in post #12473292  70-200 f/2.8 IS II +1 even though it is heavy with my 1D4. Bodies: 5DIII MkIII/ R5 mirrorles
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1434 guests, 109 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
