Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
Thread started 25 May 2011 (Wednesday) 05:59
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Focus and recompose VS using the outer focus points

 
Ricku
Goldmember
Avatar
1,295 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Bangkok
     
May 25, 2011 05:59 |  #1
bannedPermanent ban

So I have bee a long time "centerpoint focus and recomposer", but at times I see that the images are not as sharp as they should be, especialy when I am shooting at f/1.4. I have finally figured out that this is due to the recomposing itself.

How do you deal with this? Do you use one of the outer focus points? I tried to rely on the outer focus points, untill I realized how bad they are on the 5D2. The outer points gives me very mixed / unacceptable results.. That leaves me with manual focus, which is very hard in most cases and definitely impossible in low light conditions.

I know that shooting at low apertures is kinda tricky, but I would like to hear how you deal with it.


5D II 35L 135L 70-200 2.8L II Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
May 25, 2011 10:55 |  #2

If you have the time and your subject is still, manually focus. I'm not super familiar with the 5DII, but the 60D has Live View on the LCD screen; using that, you can zoom in 5x and 10x, moved the zoomed area to the place you want to focus in the frame, and get pretty precise manual focusing.

Otherwise, the outer points are maybe better than focus-and-recompose using the center point.

OR, adapt your recomposing technique so that your originally focused point stays in focus: Instead of holding the camera in one spot and turning it to recompose, "slide" the camera along a plane that's parallel to the focal plane. This is tough to do accurately, so I generally just use the outer point...


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RDKirk
Adorama says I'm "packed."
Avatar
14,378 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1380
Joined May 2004
Location: USA
     
May 25, 2011 16:28 |  #3

First be aware that the outer points--notice, they are rectangle-shaped--are sensitive only to linear contrasts running perpendicular to the rectangle. This frequently bollixes portraits because if you turn the camera vertical and then use one of the outer-end rectangles to focus on an eye, that turns the rectangle parallel to the major linear contrasts of the eye (lids and brow)...precisely the wrong thing to do.

If you rotate the camera on the lens axis even 45 degrees, that allows it to "catch" those linear contrasts with the outer rectangle, then you can rotate it back without shifting the focus plane.

Personally, I have no problem using the outer rectangles to focus on any distinct linear contrast that I'm able to see in the viewfinder, as long as I turn the camera so that the rectangle is perpendicular to the linear contrast.


TANSTAAFL--The Only Unbreakable Rule in Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ni$mo350
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,011 posts
Likes: 14
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Portland, OR
     
May 25, 2011 16:44 |  #4

I was never a big fan of focus and recompose but was forced to do it when one of my AF points hunted in any and all situations. As you know though, I sent it in to Canon under warranty and they sent it back completely fixed. Locks focus much faster than it did before. With that said, I still prefer to use the center point and still find myself doing so and cropping the shot in post which is only a temporary fix which I hope the mk3 resolves completely if and when that comes out.


-Chris-Website (external link)|| (external link)Facebook (external link)|| My Flickr (external link)|| Follow me!!! 500px (external link) || (external link) 5D mkii || 35L || 70-200 f/2.8L IS MKII || My bank account hates you all :cry:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ricku
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,295 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Bangkok
     
May 26, 2011 20:26 as a reply to  @ ni$mo350's post |  #5
bannedPermanent ban

Thanks for all the info guys. Very helpful. :)

cheers!


5D II 35L 135L 70-200 2.8L II Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sebasr
Member
87 posts
Joined Jun 2008
     
Jun 07, 2011 05:55 |  #6

Ricku wrote in post #12475124 (external link)
So I have bee a long time "centerpoint focus and recomposer", but at times I see that the images are not as sharp as they should be, especialy when I am shooting at f/1.4. I have finally figured out that this is due to the recomposing itself.

How do you deal with this? Do you use one of the outer focus points? I tried to rely on the outer focus points, untill I realized how bad they are on the 5D2. The outer points gives me very mixed / unacceptable results.. That leaves me with manual focus, which is very hard in most cases and definitely impossible in low light conditions.

I know that shooting at low apertures is kinda tricky, but I would like to hear how you deal with it.

I got the precision matte focus screen for my 5DII to assist with manual focus, and it definitely helps with 50L. When I shoot people at really close range I normally stop down to f/2.8 - 4 to get enough depth of field, they need to be facing dead on to the camera. From further away I find it gets harder to focus manually because you can't see the fine details ie, the persons eyelashes come in and out focus. If i am further away and i have my tripod handy I normally resort to live view and still focus manually. Hope this helps.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arteel
Senior Member
439 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Monterey, CA
     
Jun 14, 2011 19:39 |  #7

I usually always use my outer focus points with great results on my 5D even with apertures of 1.4. The only trouble I get sometimes is my lens hunts, but when it locks, my shots are usually sharp.


5Dc | EF 50 1.4 | EF 70-200 2.8L IS
-Ryan

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,083 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Focus and recompose VS using the outer focus points
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion People 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2792 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.