this was a quick snap in a pinch that i took
i see alot of noise, is this an acceptable level?
f4.5
1/13
iso 1600
matt99017d Member 187 posts Joined Nov 2010 Location: Medford OR More info | May 26, 2011 21:53 | #1 this was a quick snap in a pinch that i took 70-200 F4 L sold 10-22 sold
LOG IN TO REPLY |
May 26, 2011 21:57 | #2 when zoomed into the dark area of the tv it shows some pretty bad hot pixel's 70-200 F4 L sold 10-22 sold
LOG IN TO REPLY |
amfoto1 Cream of the Crop 10,331 posts Likes: 146 Joined Aug 2007 Location: San Jose, California More info | May 27, 2011 08:48 | #3 To be honest, I can't see noise at this resolution. Not saying it isn't there, just that it's not very visible at Internet resolutions. But let me throw out a few ideas... Alan Myers
LOG IN TO REPLY |
sixsixfour Goldmember 1,781 posts Likes: 26 Joined May 2007 Location: Orange County, CA More info | I agree. I cant tell the noise here. do you have a 100% crop on a part where you see the noise? Ive shot at ISO 2500 and its still fairly acceptable. then again, I rarely if ever need to shoot at that ISO. 100% crop of lower left of LCD screen: EOS 7D 1/10 sec F/3.5 15mm ISO 2500 Canon 7D / 50D / 30D / SL1 / XT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | May 27, 2011 11:50 | #5 I guess I shouldn't have shot 80% of my 7D images at 3200 or over! I would love to see a link to the full sized image, or at least a posted crop. The shutter speed was a bit too low IMO, especially if there are two moving targets (the photographer and the photographees). Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shedberg Goldmember 1,122 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Terrace, B.C. Canada More info | May 27, 2011 12:32 | #6 Yeah... the real trick to avoiding noise in your photos is to have enough light. People seem to end up underexposing their images at higher ISOs and then complain about camera performance. My Flickr Page
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver More info | May 27, 2011 12:41 | #7 I find I get more noise in the lighter transition areas with my 7D, not in the shadows. NR handles it very well as long as I get the exposure correct. Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfueng Member 61 posts Joined Dec 2008 More info | I don't see any noise. I bet if you printed it you wouldn't see noise.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
corkneyfonz Goldmember 2,477 posts Likes: 5 Joined Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom More info | May 27, 2011 14:05 | #9 There's noise in the ceiling and wall assuming that this isn't an artex bounce shadow effect. However, apart from this it looks pretty clean.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
I agree it does not look sharp, but noise it not the problem. Seems like exposure, could the light coming thru the window throw everything off?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
paparios Senior Member 500 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2007 More info | May 27, 2011 14:54 | #11 sixsixfour wrote in post #12489268 I agree. I cant tell the noise here. do you have a 100% crop on a part where you see the noise? Ive shot at ISO 2500 and its still fairly acceptable. then again, I rarely if ever need to shoot at that ISO. EOS 7D 1/10 sec F/3.5 15mm ISO 2500 Very nice Nissan GT-R, by the way. Canon 5D MKII, Sony A7, Canon EOS M, Canon 7D, Sony A6000, Canon 50d with grip, Canon 400D with grip, Bower 14 f2.8, Bower 35 f1.4, EF 40 f2.8, Tokina 12-24 f4, EFM-22 f2 STM, EFM 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM, EFS 18-55 f3.5-5.6, Tamron 28-75 f2.8, EF 85 f1.8, EF 100 f2.8L IS, EF 70-200 f4L IS, EF 75-300 f4-5.6, Sigma 150-500 f5-6.3, Sony E 16-50, Sony FE 28-70
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ChuckingFluff Goldmember 1,391 posts Likes: 2 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Canada Eh! More info | May 27, 2011 16:45 | #12 jfueng wrote in post #12489579 I don't see any noise. I bet if you printed it you wouldn't see noise. I think you nailed one of the biggest problems. People don't print their images to see if there's any noise. Instead they pixel peep and view it in a way that it will never be seen. Print it frame it and enjoy it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | May 27, 2011 17:38 | #13 Taken directly from the Imaging Resource review of the 7D... Printed results. Around here, we learned long ago that peeping at pixels onscreen is only worth so much. It's when we print the images that we get to the relevant performance of a camera's lens and sensor. And the Canon 7D's images print remarkably well. The range from ISO 100 to 800 can produce a 20x30-inch print with ease. Yes, I said ISO 800. Most cameras have results that are limited to 11x14 at that setting. By ISO 1,600 we need a slight reduction to 16x20 inches. That's really crazy, and by that I mean good. ISO 3,200 shots are great at 13x19-inches. ISO 6,400 shots increase in contrast and noise, but are still usable at 11x14 inches, and with the same comments, the ISO 12,800 shots are quite usable at 8x10. We also processed ISO 100 images in Canon's Digital Photo Pro, sharpening in Photoshop, and came up with an image that is truly tack sharp printed at 20x30 inches. By extension, you could process the other ISO settings from RAW and surely get better results. It's one of the best printed performances we've seen. One minor note we noticed after a few portrait shoots: skin tones can come out a bit cooler than we're used to from Canon SLRs, both onscreen and in prints. Our Imatest results bear this out as well. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JoYork Goldmember 3,079 posts Likes: 7 Joined Dec 2007 Location: York, England More info | May 27, 2011 17:55 | #14 |
paparios Senior Member 500 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2007 More info | May 27, 2011 20:55 | #15 TeamSpeed wrote in post #12490893 Taken directly from the Imaging Resource review of the 7D... I agree. I also want to comment that there is some noticeable difference between looking a picture on a computer screen (such as a notebook), compared with how the same picture looks in a large full HD television set. I have a 46 inches Samsung LED full HD TV, and the pictures there look fantastic, even when you look at them at close range. But more amazing, is how good a 100% crop of a given image looks at the same TV, which implies a very very large print would be possible. Canon 5D MKII, Sony A7, Canon EOS M, Canon 7D, Sony A6000, Canon 50d with grip, Canon 400D with grip, Bower 14 f2.8, Bower 35 f1.4, EF 40 f2.8, Tokina 12-24 f4, EFM-22 f2 STM, EFM 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM, EFS 18-55 f3.5-5.6, Tamron 28-75 f2.8, EF 85 f1.8, EF 100 f2.8L IS, EF 70-200 f4L IS, EF 75-300 f4-5.6, Sigma 150-500 f5-6.3, Sony E 16-50, Sony FE 28-70
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1075 guests, 158 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||