Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 26 May 2011 (Thursday) 21:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

acceptable noise from the 7D

 
matt99017d
Member
187 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Medford OR
     
May 26, 2011 21:53 |  #1

this was a quick snap in a pinch that i took
i see alot of noise, is this an acceptable level?
f4.5
1/13
iso 1600

IMAGE: http://i56.photobucket.com/albums/g196/matt9901/DPP_20.jpg

70-200 F4 L sold 10-22 sold
Tamron 28-75 Sold
traded 70-200 2.8 L
24-105 F4 L soul searching again for another trade.... 35mm 2.0 is up on the block!www.matthewrogersphoto​graphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
matt99017d
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
187 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Medford OR
     
May 26, 2011 21:57 |  #2

when zoomed into the dark area of the tv it shows some pretty bad hot pixel's


70-200 F4 L sold 10-22 sold
Tamron 28-75 Sold
traded 70-200 2.8 L
24-105 F4 L soul searching again for another trade.... 35mm 2.0 is up on the block!www.matthewrogersphoto​graphy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,331 posts
Likes: 146
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
May 27, 2011 08:48 |  #3

To be honest, I can't see noise at this resolution. Not saying it isn't there, just that it's not very visible at Internet resolutions. But let me throw out a few ideas...

Did you need to increase exposure (brighten up the image) in your computer? If the original image is underexposed, that will greatly increase noise.Was it a JPEG or a RAW file? If JPEG, what noise reduction did you have set in the camera? If RAW, what did you use to convert it and did you apply some noise reduction during the conversion?

You mention hot pixels, which are something different. If you run the camera's sensor cleaning, that might map and block actual hot pixels from future images.

It also appears you used flash for the shot. Dust specks in the atmosphere or perhaps on the front of a TV screen can be emphasized by a flash and cause something that looks like noise, but isn't.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII, 7D, M5 & others. 10-22mm, Meike 12/2.8,Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, EF-M 22/2, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Sigma 56/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS, 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sixsixfour
Goldmember
Avatar
1,781 posts
Likes: 26
Joined May 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
     
May 27, 2011 11:43 as a reply to  @ amfoto1's post |  #4

I agree. I cant tell the noise here. do you have a 100% crop on a part where you see the noise? Ive shot at ISO 2500 and its still fairly acceptable. then again, I rarely if ever need to shoot at that ISO.

see below:
full pic:

IMAGE: http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a268/evomacky/GTR/IMG_0864.jpg

100% crop of lower left of LCD screen:
IMAGE: http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a268/evomacky/GTR/100pct.jpg

EOS 7D
1/10 sec
F/3.5
15mm
ISO 2500

Canon 7D / 50D / 30D / SL1 / XT

My photography-related addiction makes a crack habit look like a fiscally responsible pasttime.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
May 27, 2011 11:50 |  #5

I guess I shouldn't have shot 80% of my 7D images at 3200 or over! :)

IMAGE: http://teamspeed.smugmug.com/Church-and-Family/Cousins/IMG3576/861702392_3Ys4F-XL.jpg

I would love to see a link to the full sized image, or at least a posted crop. The shutter speed was a bit too low IMO, especially if there are two moving targets (the photographer and the photographees).

Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shedberg
Goldmember
Avatar
1,122 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Terrace, B.C. Canada
     
May 27, 2011 12:32 |  #6

TeamSpeed wrote in post #12489301 (external link)
I guess I shouldn't have shot 80% of my 7D images at 3200 or over! :)

Yeah... the real trick to avoiding noise in your photos is to have enough light. People seem to end up underexposing their images at higher ISOs and then complain about camera performance.


My Flickr Page (external link)
6D / 7D / 16-35 II / 35 2.0 IS / 60 macro / 85 1.8 / 135 2 / 100-400 / 430EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,918 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2264
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
May 27, 2011 12:41 |  #7

I find I get more noise in the lighter transition areas with my 7D, not in the shadows. NR handles it very well as long as I get the exposure correct.

The 7D is definitely touchier than the 40D or 5DII with exposure IMO.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jfueng
Member
61 posts
Joined Dec 2008
     
May 27, 2011 12:44 as a reply to  @ windpig's post |  #8

I don't see any noise. I bet if you printed it you wouldn't see noise.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
corkneyfonz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,477 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Oct 2009
Location: United Kingdom
     
May 27, 2011 14:05 |  #9

There's noise in the ceiling and wall assuming that this isn't an artex bounce shadow effect. However, apart from this it looks pretty clean.


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mark2009
Goldmember
Avatar
2,001 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 132
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Northeast , USA
     
May 27, 2011 14:44 as a reply to  @ corkneyfonz's post |  #10

I agree it does not look sharp, but noise it not the problem. Seems like exposure, could the light coming thru the window throw everything off?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paparios
Senior Member
500 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 27, 2011 14:54 |  #11

sixsixfour wrote in post #12489268 (external link)
I agree. I cant tell the noise here. do you have a 100% crop on a part where you see the noise? Ive shot at ISO 2500 and its still fairly acceptable. then again, I rarely if ever need to shoot at that ISO.

EOS 7D
1/10 sec
F/3.5
15mm
ISO 2500

Very nice Nissan GT-R, by the way.

Miguel


Canon 5D MKII, Sony A7, Canon EOS M, Canon 7D, Sony A6000, Canon 50d with grip, Canon 400D with grip, Bower 14 f2.8, Bower 35 f1.4, EF 40 f2.8, Tokina 12-24 f4, EFM-22 f2 STM, EFM 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM, EFS 18-55 f3.5-5.6, Tamron 28-75 f2.8, EF 85 f1.8, EF 100 f2.8L IS, EF 70-200 f4L IS, EF 75-300 f4-5.6, Sigma 150-500 f5-6.3, Sony E 16-50, Sony FE 28-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChuckingFluff
Goldmember
Avatar
1,391 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Canada Eh!
     
May 27, 2011 16:45 |  #12

jfueng wrote in post #12489579 (external link)
I don't see any noise. I bet if you printed it you wouldn't see noise.

I think you nailed one of the biggest problems. People don't print their images to see if there's any noise. Instead they pixel peep and view it in a way that it will never be seen. Print it frame it and enjoy it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
May 27, 2011 17:38 |  #13

Taken directly from the Imaging Resource review of the 7D...

Printed results. Around here, we learned long ago that peeping at pixels onscreen is only worth so much. It's when we print the images that we get to the relevant performance of a camera's lens and sensor. And the Canon 7D's images print remarkably well.

The range from ISO 100 to 800 can produce a 20x30-inch print with ease. Yes, I said ISO 800. Most cameras have results that are limited to 11x14 at that setting. By ISO 1,600 we need a slight reduction to 16x20 inches. That's really crazy, and by that I mean good. ISO 3,200 shots are great at 13x19-inches. ISO 6,400 shots increase in contrast and noise, but are still usable at 11x14 inches, and with the same comments, the ISO 12,800 shots are quite usable at 8x10.

We also processed ISO 100 images in Canon's Digital Photo Pro, sharpening in Photoshop, and came up with an image that is truly tack sharp printed at 20x30 inches. By extension, you could process the other ISO settings from RAW and surely get better results. It's one of the best printed performances we've seen.

One minor note we noticed after a few portrait shoots: skin tones can come out a bit cooler than we're used to from Canon SLRs, both onscreen and in prints. Our Imatest results bear this out as well.


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JoYork
Goldmember
Avatar
3,079 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2007
Location: York, England
     
May 27, 2011 17:55 |  #14

I can't see any noise in the sample posted.


Jo
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paparios
Senior Member
500 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 27, 2011 20:55 |  #15

TeamSpeed wrote in post #12490893 (external link)
Taken directly from the Imaging Resource review of the 7D...

I agree. I also want to comment that there is some noticeable difference between looking a picture on a computer screen (such as a notebook), compared with how the same picture looks in a large full HD television set. I have a 46 inches Samsung LED full HD TV, and the pictures there look fantastic, even when you look at them at close range. But more amazing, is how good a 100% crop of a given image looks at the same TV, which implies a very very large print would be possible.

Miguel


Canon 5D MKII, Sony A7, Canon EOS M, Canon 7D, Sony A6000, Canon 50d with grip, Canon 400D with grip, Bower 14 f2.8, Bower 35 f1.4, EF 40 f2.8, Tokina 12-24 f4, EFM-22 f2 STM, EFM 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS STM, EFS 18-55 f3.5-5.6, Tamron 28-75 f2.8, EF 85 f1.8, EF 100 f2.8L IS, EF 70-200 f4L IS, EF 75-300 f4-5.6, Sigma 150-500 f5-6.3, Sony E 16-50, Sony FE 28-70

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,999 views & 0 likes for this thread, 25 members have posted to it.
acceptable noise from the 7D
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1075 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.