Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 27 May 2011 (Friday) 15:12
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

recommend me a tripod head..

 
CyberManiaK
Senior Member
673 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2009
Location: So.Cal
     
May 27, 2011 15:12 |  #1

Well i just order the Davis & sanford Voyager legs. http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_Voyager_Tripod​_with.html (external link)

I know they are cheap got them on amazon for 20 bucks !! So I say what the hell lets try them.. http://www.amazon.com/​gp/product/B0019M0B0C (external link)

But now which Head you recommend it will be used for landscape and macro. And it will support my 60D + sigma 10-20 and sigma 180..

Also for video I will get this head http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …d_V12_V12_Fluid​_Head.html (external link)

You thing that head will serve well also for macro ? or also I should get a ball head ?

If getting both heads is a must.. I'm ok with that.

Max budget for the ball head or a 3 way head is around $70.

So any recommendations ??


Carlos
60D / 10-20 + 100L + 40/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
May 27, 2011 16:31 |  #2

A ball head will be much better because its so much faster to set up the way you want.

If you're seriously into landscape and macro... you don't want a cheap tripod/legs, people keep saying that, but its true, especially for landscape, where you'll be using long exposures and where the slightest wobble or vibration will ruin the picture. The tripod and head are as important as the lens. Don't skimp.

If you buy a $70 head, you'll likely find that it sags, and you'll get annoyed at it, and end up buying another one, then you'll have spent more money than you would have if you'd bought a good head in the first place.

I recommend you at least try to double your budget and get a decent head, because a tripod and head can literally be a lifetime investment, unlike other parts of photography such as the body, which you'll upgrade in a few years time.

For $140, I'd highly recommend this one:
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …nesit_MB4_1_Bal​lhead.html (external link)

HOWEVER, if you absolutely cannot increase your budget, and HAVE to get a $70 head, then you could take a look at the horusbennu stuff, they're cheap and get good reviews, and are rated to support quite heavy loads. The LX-2T is around $70.

Or if you want to stick with better known brands, you could try this one from cullmann (I like cullmann, a LOT, they have the best customer service I've ever come across, and their products are simply great, even though they are not so well known compared to others like manfrotto, gitzo, RSS etc...):
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_CB7_3_Ballhead​_With.html (external link)

Or this manfrotto one:
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …2_494_Mini_Ball​_Head.html (external link)


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Saint728
Goldmember
Avatar
2,892 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Honolulu Hawaii
     
May 27, 2011 16:49 |  #3

I hope your only 5 feet tall because those legs fully extended including the center column is only 58 inches which is 2 inches shy of 5 feet. Also when you extend the center column out as far as it can go it gets really unstable and wobbly. I would have spent a little more and got something like a Manfrotto 055 and 498 ball head for $215.26 from B&H. http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …5XDB_Tripod_Leg​s_Kit.html (external link)

Take Care,
Cheers, Patrick


Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
Click Here To See My Gear
Click here to see my Flickr (external link)
http://www.runryder.co​m/helicopter/gallery/9​019/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberManiaK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
673 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2009
Location: So.Cal
     
May 27, 2011 17:09 |  #4

Sirrith wrote in post #12490613 (external link)
A ball head will be much better because its so much faster to set up the way you want.

If you're seriously into landscape and macro... you don't want a cheap tripod/legs, people keep saying that, but its true, especially for landscape, where you'll be using long exposures and where the slightest wobble or vibration will ruin the picture. The tripod and head are as important as the lens. Don't skimp.

If you buy a $70 head, you'll likely find that it sags, and you'll get annoyed at it, and end up buying another one, then you'll have spent more money than you would have if you'd bought a good head in the first place.

I recommend you at least try to double your budget and get a decent head, because a tripod and head can literally be a lifetime investment, unlike other parts of photography such as the body, which you'll upgrade in a few years time.

For $140, I'd highly recommend this one:
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …nesit_MB4_1_Bal​lhead.html (external link)

HOWEVER, if you absolutely cannot increase your budget, and HAVE to get a $70 head, then you could take a look at the horusbennu stuff, they're cheap and get good reviews, and are rated to support quite heavy loads. The LX-2T is around $70.

Or if you want to stick with better known brands, you could try this one from cullmann (I like cullmann, a LOT, they have the best customer service I've ever come across, and their products are simply great, even though they are not so well known compared to others like manfrotto, gitzo, RSS etc...):
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …_CB7_3_Ballhead​_With.html (external link)

Or this manfrotto one:
http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …2_494_Mini_Ball​_Head.html (external link)

I really appreciate your time, to write this.. I will take a look on those ball heads then..

Saint728 wrote in post #12490675 (external link)
I hope your only 5 feet tall because those legs fully extended including the center column is only 58 inches which is 2 inches shy of 5 feet. Also when you extend the center column out as far as it can go it gets really unstable and wobbly. I would have spent a little more and got something like a Manfrotto 055 and 498 ball head for $215.26 from B&H. http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …5XDB_Tripod_Leg​s_Kit.html (external link)

Take Care,
Cheers, Patrick

Yup i'm 5'6" my 4 years old tripod sony vctr640, i use it at around 50-53" inches.. but I want something that can go down to the ground. My first choice was the manfrotto 190XBPROB + 496RC2 but that will leave me out of the fluid head for video. I really want to start doing some video when i go out for macro and landscape.. thats why I choose the cheapo legs, just to wet my feets on this.

So you guys think the 496RC2 will fit the voyager tripod ?? I have only 20 minutes to place the order so i can get it tomorrow..

Thanks.


Carlos
60D / 10-20 + 100L + 40/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
May 27, 2011 17:23 |  #5

I would have gone with the Manfrotto setup and saved for the fluid head.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberManiaK
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
673 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jan 2009
Location: So.Cal
     
May 27, 2011 17:31 |  #6

Well I just place the order for the 496RC2 head, So Voyager legs, Manfrotto ball head 496RC2 head, and the fluid head $188.73 shipped to receive everything tomorrow , guess later I just could add some new legs.. and have a nice setup

Just I hope the manfrotto fits the voyager haha


Carlos
60D / 10-20 + 100L + 40/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
May 28, 2011 04:36 |  #7

It should fit fine, and if not you can buy an adapter for it quite cheaply :)

One thing to be careful with is not to get too heavily invested in the RC2 system. It doesn't cut it for heavier setups, and you'll probably be wanting to upgrade to Arca-Swiss compatible stuff within the foreseeable future, so don't sink all your money into it.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,463 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4552
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
May 28, 2011 08:48 |  #8

Sirrith wrote:
A ball head will be much better because its so much faster to set up the way you want.

If you're seriously into landscape and macro... you don't want a cheap tripod/legs, people keep saying that, but its true, especially for landscape, where you'll be using long exposures and where the slightest wobble or vibration will ruin the picture. The tripod and head are as important as the lens. Don't skimp.

If you buy a $70 head, you'll likely find that it sags, and you'll get annoyed at it, and end up buying another one, then you'll have spent more money than you would have if you'd bought a good head in the first place.

I recommend you at least try to double your budget and get a decent head, because a tripod and head can literally be a lifetime investment, unlike other parts of photography such as the body, which you'll upgrade in a few years time.

One thing to be careful with is not to get too heavily invested in the RC2 system. It doesn't cut it for heavier setups, and you'll probably be wanting to upgrade to Arca-Swiss compatible stuff within the foreseeable future, so don't sink all your money into it.



Listen to Sirrith's pearls of trpiod and head wisdom, even if the heads that he suggested are not to your liking.


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,680 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
recommend me a tripod head..
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1469 guests, 131 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.