Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 28 May 2011 (Saturday) 09:02
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

T3i portrait shots blurry.

 
stpix
Member
222 posts
Joined Mar 2013
     
Apr 05, 2014 11:13 |  #61

rmanncobb wrote in post #16806509 (external link)
excuse me??? Just who offered to help me????
and as for the bad grammar, please, do tell??? Be sure you re post for all to see. As I said I will re post and copy this for everyone and anyone who would like to see this.
AND my apologies for my misconception that anyone on here might have any influence at all with CANON!! for that I truly do apologize.
I can see its just a lot of old men that think their opinions matter anyway.
As for you. You need to make sure you know and understand what you are talking about before you jump in with your opinions! They were not accurate.

I WILL NOT RESPOND TO ANY MORE POSTS JUST SO YOU KNOW> TIRED OF WASTING MY TIME!!!

and no need to sign on this one lol

---

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/04/1/LQ_681792.jpg
Image hosted by forum (681792) © stpix [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

7d T3i EF-S 10-22 EF-S 17-55 EF-S 18-55 EF-S 60 Macro EF-S 55-250 EF 400 mm 5.6 L EX 430
http://stpix.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeamSpeed
01010100 01010011
Avatar
40,862 posts
Gallery: 116 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 8923
Joined May 2002
Location: Midwest
     
Apr 05, 2014 17:21 |  #62

rmanncobb wrote in post #16806509 (external link)
I can see its just a lot of old men that think their opinions matter anyway.
As for you. You need to make sure you know and understand what you are talking about before you jump in with your opinions! They were not accurate.

I WILL NOT RESPOND TO ANY MORE POSTS JUST SO YOU KNOW> TIRED OF WASTING MY TIME!!!

and no need to sign on this one lol

That explains the "old men" comment, as rmanncobb is a lady, her name is Rhonda. I thought the comment was interesting coming from a 48 year old, now I know why. :)


Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery (external link) My Business Gallery (external link)
"Man only has 5 senses, and sometimes not even that, so if they define the world, the universe, the dimensions of existence, and spirituality with just these limited senses, their view of what-is and what-can-be is very myopic indeed and they are doomed, now and forever."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
23,088 posts
Gallery: 84 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 2889
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Apr 05, 2014 22:02 |  #63

TeamSpeed wrote in post #16812195 (external link)
That explains the "old men" comment, as rmanncobb is a lady, her name is Rhonda. I thought the comment was interesting coming from a 48 year old, now I know why. :)

Very interesting.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Copper ­ NYC
Senior Member
Avatar
399 posts
Likes: 23
Joined Sep 2011
Location: Queens County, NYC NY
     
Apr 05, 2014 22:26 |  #64

Perhaps this is what she is.
Definition of IDIOT SAVANT,

1
: a person affected with a mental disability (as autism or mental retardation) who exhibits exceptional skill or brilliance in some limited field (as mathematics or music) —called also savant
2
: a person who is highly knowledgeable about one subject but knows little about anything else

IMHO I don't think she's wrapped to tight


40D Gripped, 50D, T2I Gripped, 5D Mark III Gripped, EF-S 18-55 IS, EF-S 55-250 IS
EF 28 f/2.8 IS, EF 40 2.8 STM, EF 50 f/1.4 USM,
EF 85 f/1.8 USM, EF 100 f/2.8 Macro USM, EF 24-105L f/4.0
EF 28-80 USM, the good one with metal mount and ring USM.
EF 28-80 USM V, EF 28-135 USM IS, EF 100-300 USM, EF 100-400L USM IS.
Rokinon 14 f/2.8

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Apr 05, 2014 22:39 as a reply to  @ Copper NYC's post |  #65

I'm surprised this thread hasn't been closed long before this.


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Brain ­ Mechanic
Goldmember
Avatar
3,526 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Apr 2010
     
Apr 05, 2014 23:27 |  #66
bannedPermanent ban

Copperny wrote in post #16812692 (external link)
Perhaps this is what she is.
Definition of IDIOT SAVANT,

1
: a person affected with a mental disability (as autism or mental retardation) who exhibits exceptional skill or brilliance in some limited field (as mathematics or music) —called also savant
2
: a person who is highly knowledgeable about one subject but knows little about anything else

IMHO I don't think she's wrapped to tight

...or don't wrapped at all.;)


Gear: a toothed wheel :p
"To be of good quality, you have to excuse yourself from the presence of shallow and callow minded individuals" Michael Bassey Johnson
--Oscar--
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
firefighter4u
Goldmember
Avatar
1,183 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 150
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Bradford, Pa
     
Apr 05, 2014 23:40 |  #67

DutchinCLE wrote in post #16806527 (external link)
I am glad he told us he is member in good standing with 2 different honor societies, otherwise I would have thought he was a complete .....

Tool....:rolleyes:


R6; 7D; 450D; Canon 85 1.4L; 50 1.4; 70-200 2.8L II; Tamron 17-50 2.8; Tamron 18-270 VC;

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
venom3300
Senior Member
610 posts
Likes: 145
Joined Jan 2014
     
Apr 06, 2014 00:20 |  #68

wow this more entertainment than I've had all week.

clearly the T3i is crap. Thats why Canon sold so many. People love blurry pictures...


Bodies: Nikon D800,Canon Rebel GII, Pentax K1000
Lenses: Nikon 20mm 1.8, Nikon 24 2.8 MF, Tamron SP 35mm 1.8, Tamron 90 2.8 Macro, Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR I, Nikon AI-P 500mm F4, Nikon TC-16A, SMC Pentax-A 50/1.7, SMC Pentax-M 100/4 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Frodge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,116 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 152
Joined Nov 2012
     
Apr 06, 2014 07:53 |  #69

People forget that 30 years ago some of us were using fully manual cameras with only a light meter. The T3i is hardly the problem unless you get a defective one.


_______________
“It's kind of fun to do the impossible.” - Walt Disney.
Equipment: Tokina 12-24mm, Canon 40mm 2.8, Tamron 17-50 2.8 XR Di, Canon 18-55mm, Canon 50mm 1.8, Tamron 70-300VC / T3I and 60D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
yogestee
"my posts can be a little colourful"
Avatar
13,845 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 41
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Australia
     
Apr 06, 2014 09:09 |  #70

Frodge wrote in post #16813171 (external link)
People forget that 30 years ago some of us were using fully manual cameras with only a light meter. The T3i is hardly the problem unless you get a defective one.

Thirty years ago I was using fully manual cameras WITHOUT a light metre ;)


Jurgen
50D~EOS M50 MkII~EOS M~G11~S95~GoPro Hero4 Silver
http://www.pbase.com/j​urgentreue (external link)
The Title Fairy,, off with her head!!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
khughes44
Member
200 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
     
Apr 06, 2014 09:46 as a reply to  @ yogestee's post |  #71

The Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scale indicates Rhonda wrote her first post at a grade 8 level. Her subsequent posts got worse. 2 honour societies?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
genesimmons
Goldmember
Avatar
1,984 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1181
Joined Aug 2013
Location: bc canada
     
Apr 06, 2014 09:47 |  #72

sandpiper wrote in post #16806755 (external link)
Wow.

Rmanncobb, I don't know if you are still reading this but this is intended as a helpful reply.

Firstly, the electronic sizzling sound is perfectly normal, it is simply the camera not having enough light to focus and so using a rapid burst of flashes (one flash does not last long enough) to add light to the scene whilst the camera focuses. This is not a fault. If you keep the shutter button pressed down it will do the "sizzling" bit as it focuses, then take the shot. If you hear the sizzle and take your finger off then it will just have to start again when you press it again. A quick glance in the manual where it describes the onboard flash function would have clarified that, and you could have used the camera just fine.

The blurriness could be down to many things, but it sounds like you were using one of the basic modes, which all default to "all AF points active". This means the camera uses all the autofocus points and focuses on whatever it thinks may be the subject. Very often this is not waht YOU think is the subject. There are also many other ways that blur can occur and they are normally due to user error in one form or another.

Yes, blurriness can be down to faulty equipment, but 98% of the time it is just down to user error. As your initial post (rant) showed little understanding of the camera you were using, it is natural for people to think user error is far more likely than a faulty camera. Nothing you described that camera doing is a fault, it is all normal behaviour which is explained in the manual, had you read it.

You complain that, when you used an external flash, the camera made you miss the "good" shots because it wouldn't shoot and said "busy". Again, that is normal, flashes need to recharge, the image buffer gets filled and needs to be emptied etc. When the camera says "busy" all the time you are simply shooting too fast, slow down and wait until the good shot comes along, THEN take a shot and wait until the next good opportunity. Blazing away at the poorer opportunities, then complaining because the camera is busy when the good ones occur, is (and I hate to say it) user error again.

You need to be aware that a DSLR is a much more complex beast than a cheap point and shoot, but that does not mean that it will give better results automatically. In fact, the opposite usually applies as P&S cameras have much greater depth of field, which makes focus issues far less significant and so reduces blurriness from missed focus, especially at wide apertures. P&S cameras are usually aimed at doing everything for the user, where DSLR cameras tend to need much more user input to get good results. If you just stick a DSLR on full auto, or in a basic mode, then it will quite possibly not do as well as a P&S in the same situation. Take control of the DSLR yourself though and, with a little practice, it will blow the P&S out of the water. You do need to learn how to use it though.

This forum is a great resource and many people find "issues" like yours when they first get a DSLR. They come on here and ask for help and quickly get taught what they are doing wrong and how to correct the problems they are having. Many go on to become very accomplished photographers who then help out the next generation of newbies.

I know it isn't what you want to hear, but the problems you had are typical for a new DSLR user, had you come on here a year ago and asked for help, and not insisted that the camera is faulty and it can't possibly be user error, then you would have been able to take good pictures and not lost all that time taking bad ones. If it WAS the camera at fault, then people would have looked at the issue and your pictures and figured out what you needed to do.

The professors who taught you how to use the camera should have said straight away that the sizzling flash is just normal AF assist working, and how to get out of the basic zones and into the creative modes and take control over what your camera is trying to do. The fact that they did not is astounding if they actually teach photography. Surely, they can't teach photography and let you leave it on auto.

Coming along and ranting about faulty equipment, then slagging off those who try and help you by pointing out your errors will get you nowhere in life. It was pointed out that, if you thought the camera was faulty you should have got it exchanged or asked for help at the start. You chose to carry on with something that either wasn't working, or you needed some help in using, without dealing with it. Now you blame your grades on the bad camera. At some point in your life you will need to accept responsibility for your own actions / decisions and accept that you aren't so smart that you cannot be doing things wrong. You blame your bad photography on a "bad camera", then your bad grades on the "bad camera", then you come here and say that everybody is working for Canon because they say the "bad camera" sounds normal and maybe you were just doing something wrong.

People on here are normally very polite and he;lpful and go out of their way to diagnose problems and whether they are due to faulty equipment or user error. People helped then go on and change the faulty gear or learn how to use the perfcetly good gear that they had all along. Sure, some people were less than their normal polite selves to you. Once again, you cannot see that this was caused by your attitude, because you cannot be at fault it must be a faulty forum and so you leave.

If you stick around, and take a more humble attitude and show a willingness to learn how to use your camera then sure, post up some pictures with the exif intact and I am sure that people will be willing to help you out. Continue with the same attitude though and it will just be bounced back at you again.


very good reply,the best i have read in a long time,very positive


OLYMPUS EM1 M2. 12-100 F4 PRO.75mm f1.8,fisheye f1.8 pro. SONY A7 various manual lenses. FUJI X100
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/100085318@N08/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
genesimmons
Goldmember
Avatar
1,984 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1181
Joined Aug 2013
Location: bc canada
     
Apr 06, 2014 09:48 |  #73

also if the op is still reading,ill buy your canon and equipment if u are not happy with it so u can concentrate on skool and try a different route


OLYMPUS EM1 M2. 12-100 F4 PRO.75mm f1.8,fisheye f1.8 pro. SONY A7 various manual lenses. FUJI X100
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/100085318@N08/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
venom3300
Senior Member
610 posts
Likes: 145
Joined Jan 2014
     
Apr 06, 2014 13:43 |  #74

Frodge wrote in post #16813171 (external link)
People forget that 30 years ago some of us were using fully manual cameras with only a light meter. The T3i is hardly the problem unless you get a defective one.

which is exactly what I bought my girlfriend to learn on to prevent the confusion like the person here...


Bodies: Nikon D800,Canon Rebel GII, Pentax K1000
Lenses: Nikon 20mm 1.8, Nikon 24 2.8 MF, Tamron SP 35mm 1.8, Tamron 90 2.8 Macro, Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR I, Nikon AI-P 500mm F4, Nikon TC-16A, SMC Pentax-A 50/1.7, SMC Pentax-M 100/4 Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

16,650 views & 0 likes for this thread, 35 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
T3i portrait shots blurry.
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is johntmyers418
1185 guests, 186 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.