Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 29 May 2011 (Sunday) 19:20
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Reflector hurts clients' eyes.

 
mariettaphotog
Member
Avatar
155 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Georgia
     
May 30, 2011 20:36 |  #16

try the white side..not quite as "shiny"


Allen
Canon 50D - Gripped
Canon 55-250mm f/3.5-5.6, 18-55 EF-s, 75-300 EF III
(Yes, I KNOW...TWO of my lenses SUCK!)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14915
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 30, 2011 20:39 |  #17

This is one of the reasons I use a flash for fill instead of a reflector. The flash is so brief that it doesnt hurt the subjects eyes, and its infinitely more controllable than a reflector.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
May 30, 2011 21:43 |  #18

gonzogolf wrote in post #12506321 (external link)
This is one of the reasons I use a flash for fill instead of a reflector. The flash is so brief that it doesnt hurt the subjects eyes, and its infinitely more controllable than a reflector.

Not necessarily.

There's no way that using a flash for fill can get in under the eyes or under the chin in the same way that a reflector can when held and positioned by an assistant. The fill that comes from camera position creates a different look than a well positioned reflector.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,092 posts
Likes: 48
Joined Dec 2005
     
May 30, 2011 21:53 |  #19

TMR Design wrote in post #12506615 (external link)
Not necessarily.

There's no way that using a flash for fill can get in under the eyes or under the chin in the same way that a reflector can when held and positioned by an assistant. The fill that comes from camera position creates a different look than a well positioned reflector.

I didn't see the words "camera mounted" in front of the word "flash" in his post...


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
May 30, 2011 21:58 as a reply to  @ cdifoto's post |  #20

Very true.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14915
Joined Dec 2006
     
May 30, 2011 22:20 |  #21

Nope, didnt mean to imply camera mounted flash, but rather off camera flash.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
george ­ m ­ w
Goldmember
Avatar
4,022 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Oct 2007
     
May 30, 2011 23:48 |  #22

When you are reflecting this light into their face, you are essentially trying to even out the bright areas from the shadows. Instead of adding light with the reflector, try subtracting light by having your assistant hold the panel between the sun and your subject, literally putting them in the shade of your panel. This shot from a few weeks ago is an example. We were quite a distance from the shade of the trees in the BG, the sun was full on this girl, and I literally had just a few seconds to get the shot. I had a small cali sunbounce with me, so I handed it to her mom and asked her to put some shade on her. The result was one of their favorite shots of this season.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

regards, george w

"It's also obvious that people determined to solve user error with more expensive equipment will graduate to expensive user error."
Dave N.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Savas ­ K
Goldmember
1,425 posts
Joined May 2007
     
May 31, 2011 01:23 |  #23

Nice. Dynamic range is brought within values that the camera can capture.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
toffiloff
Member
Avatar
211 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Eindhoven, The Netherlands / Oslo, Norway
     
May 31, 2011 07:02 |  #24

george m w wrote in post #12507277 (external link)
When you are reflecting this light into their face, you are essentially trying to even out the bright areas from the shadows. Instead of adding light with the reflector, try subtracting light by having your assistant hold the panel between the sun and your subject, literally putting them in the shade of your panel. This shot from a few weeks ago is an example. We were quite a distance from the shade of the trees in the BG, the sun was full on this girl, and I literally had just a few seconds to get the shot. I had a small cali sunbounce with me, so I handed it to her mom and asked her to put some shade on her. The result was one of their favorite shots of this season.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Great idea! Thanks for sharing. Just started to use a reflector myself a few days ago


1D3 / 5D2-BG / 350D * 16-35 II f/2.8L * 24-70 f/2.8L * 70-200 f/2.8L * 135 f/2.0L * Σ85 f/1.4 * Σ50 f/1.4 * Σ15 f/2.8 FE * 580-II EX -- flickr (external link) -- twitter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,032 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
Reflector hurts clients' eyes.
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2769 guests, 157 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.