^^ nice shot!
Sorry if I'm too frank but you Dazzle with your looks
:o
Candersson Goldmember 1,143 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Sweden More info | ^^ nice shot! - Thomas -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Christina.DazzleByDesign Goldmember 1,973 posts Likes: 6 Joined Mar 2012 More info | May 08, 2012 15:21 | #2702 Candersson wrote in post #14400226 ^^ nice shot! Sorry if I'm too frank but you Dazzle with your looks :ohaha, is that supposed to be a play on my username? The company would be so proud, lol! :3 5D3 | 7D | 85L II | 70-300L | 24-105L | Nifty Fifty | 600EX-RT_______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Candersson Goldmember 1,143 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2008 Location: Sweden More info |
- Thomas -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | May 08, 2012 20:28 | #2704
LOG IN TO REPLY |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop 12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | May 08, 2012 21:10 | #2705 Candersson wrote in post #14400303 ![]() Yes... I think you should consider doing some work in front of the camera as well. Don't hide behind that 85 ![]() x2! I would love to see some more self-portraits, especially insane creative ones!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
charrocallado Goldmember 1,144 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2008 Location: PA More info | May 08, 2012 21:16 | #2706 I'm speechless.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tonyz Member 223 posts Joined Oct 2011 More info | Permanent ban^ Agreed!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop 12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | May 08, 2012 21:24 | #2708 Tonyz wrote in post #14401998 ^ Agreed! I always thought that the 85L and the 70-200 2.8 II were equal in terms of great bokeh, but it looks like I was wrong! Great shot. ![]() Oh definitely not! The 70-200 has some insane bokeh, but the 85L (imo) beats it out of the water with it's creaminess. That being said zoomed in 150mm+ at a near min. focusing distance and you will have some insane creamy bokeh!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airfrogusmc I'm a chimper. There I said it... More info | May 08, 2012 21:25 | #2709 laxlife1234 wrote in post #14402032 Oh definitely not! The 70-200 has some insane bokeh, but the 85L (imo) beats it out of the water with it's creaminess. That being said zoomed in 150mm+ at a near min. focusing distance and you will have some insane creamy bokeh! ![]() You should try the 200 2L
LOG IN TO REPLY |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop 12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | May 08, 2012 21:33 | #2710 I should!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Christina.DazzleByDesign Goldmember 1,973 posts Likes: 6 Joined Mar 2012 More info | May 08, 2012 22:00 | #2711 Candersson wrote in post #14400303 ![]() Yes... I think you should consider doing some work in front of the camera as well. Don't hide behind that 85 ![]() :p hehe, Thanks, but I think I would make a terrible model at this point. I know enough about photography now that I would be insanely picky! haha! And yeah, the 85L is pretty massive. It hides the entire camera body! x2! I would love to see some more self-portraits, especially insane creative ones! I have to admit as well that the bokeh on this is much better than the 70-200 (having been able to use one today), but I'm really going to miss this lens Nooo you are selling it then? 5D3 | 7D | 85L II | 70-300L | 24-105L | Nifty Fifty | 600EX-RT_______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop 12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | May 08, 2012 22:16 | #2712 Christina.DazzleByDesign wrote in post #14402231 :p hehe, Thanks, but I think I would make a terrible model at this point. I know enough about photography now that I would be insanely picky! haha! And yeah, the 85L is pretty massive. It hides the entire camera body! ![]() Nooo you are selling it then? ![]() But the bokeh on the 70-200 is really nice - the 85 is special though. I hope it finds its way back into your hands again!Yeah, sadly
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Christina.DazzleByDesign Goldmember 1,973 posts Likes: 6 Joined Mar 2012 More info | May 08, 2012 22:24 | #2713 laxlife1234 wrote in post #14402293 Yeah, sadly I'm going to be shooting sports next fall (I'm pretty sure I'll be paid!), so I figured a 70-200 would be worth it, plus I get 85mm + everything else from 70-200. If all goes according to plan by the end of the summer I should have a 17-40 (or 16-35), 50 1.4, 70-200 and possibly another 85L ![]() Sounds like it will be a better deal in the end then with those additional lenses. 5D3 | 7D | 85L II | 70-300L | 24-105L | Nifty Fifty | 600EX-RT_______________
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pilotsleep Member 81 posts Joined Mar 2012 More info | May 08, 2012 23:00 | #2714 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pilotsleep/7162566636/ IMG_2604 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pilotsleep/7162616472/ ATH-M50 Canon 5D Mark II|35mm /1.4L|85mm f/1.2L|24-105mm f/4L| 580EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
laxlife1234 Cream of the Crop 12,432 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2011 Location: NY More info | May 08, 2012 23:03 | #2715 Christina.DazzleByDesign wrote in post #14402340 Sounds like it will be a better deal in the end then with those additional lenses. I still keep my 85L in its lens pouch while its in my camera bag...am I weird?! I swear my 24-105 must be feeling a tad rejected at this point. It stands in a relatively fat shadow of the 70-200 and the 85 combined I'll show it some more love soon.Well, just debating on whether or not to use the 85 or 70-200 is a whole different story!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1223 guests, 124 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||