Critique four of my photos please

I will try again

Thanks, how do I post the other 3?

maybe this will work.

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Yes ,that works

I have a thing for bokeh. The background is distracting for me.

There is a critique board on this forum where you may get more responses.

1) You blew out the details on her dress and they look really awkward. Also, you have her butt facing the camera which isn't the most appealing angle for anyone. If you'd stopped down a bit, rotated her slightly, and had them put their heads together it would have made it a stronger photo.

2) OK shot. Would have been better if you'd blurred the background a bit. Also her skin tone is different in this shot then it was in the first shot. But her dress isn't blown out.

3) Again, her skin tone is different in this shot as well. And it looks like his hand is grabbing her butt. And you blew out the dress again.

4) Cute shot. I like their heads being together like that. I wish his left hand was holder hers or something. And, again, she has a different skin tone and her dress is blown out. Also, cropping at the ankles is a pet peeve of mine. Feet are OK to include in full body shots! But a cute pic none the less.

In general, they aren't bad! There are a few things that can be improved and you can easily do it in PP if you shot in RAW (and maybe even if you didn't but not as likely). Try to keep skin tones looking the same. That can be a struggle with changing lighting conditions, but in this case the light conditions should have been the same throughout.

Not bad. This might improve results in the future if you continue to shoot natty light. Just watch your comp and choice of backgrounds.

amonline wrote in post #12576248
Not bad. This might improve results in the future if you continue to shoot natty light. Just watch your comp and choice of backgrounds.

Did you really just call it natty light? lol.

Bentapp2 wrote in post #12586740
Did you really just call it natty light? lol.

Yes, I did.