Quick question. I was first planning to get the sigma 85 1.4 as a wedding lens, but I heard so many good things about the canon 85 1.8. Do any of you guys use the 1.8 and can it be a very nice work horse during weddings? Thanks in advance.
DownsPhotography Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Jun 10, 2011 23:54 | #1 Quick question. I was first planning to get the sigma 85 1.4 as a wedding lens, but I heard so many good things about the canon 85 1.8. Do any of you guys use the 1.8 and can it be a very nice work horse during weddings? Thanks in advance. | 5D mark III | 5D mark II gripped | Canon 100L |Canon 24-105L | Canon 70-200L 2.8L IS II | Sigma 35 1.4 | Sigma 50 1.4 | Sigma 85 1.4 | 580ex II | 430ex II x 2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
form "inadequately equipped" 4,929 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Henderson, NV More info | Jun 11, 2011 01:49 | #2 Works good but massive purple fringing wide open and very bad with flare. Las Vegas Wedding Photographer: http://www.joeyallenphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PMCphotography Goldmember 1,775 posts Joined Sep 2009 Location: Tasmania, Australia. More info | Jun 11, 2011 06:08 | #3 I use it every wedding. Its a great little lens- very light and versatile as a short tele lens. I don't find flare to be all that bad, but there is purple fringing wide open- mostly outdoors in the sun, if you stop down to 2.8-3.2 ish it gets much better. Twitter
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Collin85 Cream of the Crop 8,164 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Sydney/Beijing More info | Jun 11, 2011 06:15 | #4 Great lens, I miss my 85/1.8 very much. Col | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
umphotography grabbing their Johnson More info | Great lens, i didnt have the purple stuff tha others have mentioned. sold it to get the Sigma 85mm. As far as im concerned sigma 85mm is the best one in its class. I tested it against the canon 85L. virtually no difference except the price. If you can afford the sigma, get it. Better than the canon 85mm 1.8 at every stop. Mike
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DownsPhotography THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Jun 11, 2011 08:59 | #6 umphotography wrote in post #12574429 Great lens, i didnt have the purple stuff tha others have mentioned. sold it to get the Sigma 85mm. As far as im concerned sigma 85mm is the best one in its class. I tested it against the canon 85L. virtually no difference except the price. If you can afford the sigma, get it. Better than the canon 85mm 1.8 at every stop. That being said, i used an 85mm 1.8 for 4 years before i could afford to upgrade. There is no way the canon 85L is worth the price point its at when you put the sigma 85 against it. Thanks! This was just want I wanted to hear. I plan on getting the 85 1.8 and get the 1.4 a few months down the road. | 5D mark III | 5D mark II gripped | Canon 100L |Canon 24-105L | Canon 70-200L 2.8L IS II | Sigma 35 1.4 | Sigma 50 1.4 | Sigma 85 1.4 | 580ex II | 430ex II x 2 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DownsPhotography THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Jun 11, 2011 08:59 | #7 |
amonline Goldmember 3,558 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jul 2006 More info | Jun 12, 2011 15:38 | #8 It fringes on crop, but hardly at all on FF. I'd go with the Canon on this one.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Jun 12, 2011 16:42 | #9 85 1.8 is half the price and it's a great lens. I recall having CA issues myself when I owned this lens before, however the Sigma also has some CA as does the 85L. Just the fact of life with these primes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DownsPhotography THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,967 posts Likes: 1 Joined Mar 2010 Location: New Orleans More info | Jun 12, 2011 17:18 | #10 |
npompei Senior Member 563 posts Joined Nov 2007 Location: Warrington, PA More info | Jun 14, 2011 07:45 | #11 Served me well a few months ago when my 70-200 2.8 wasn't fast enough inside the church. www.nickpompei.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Luz Member 198 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: Houston, TX More info | Jun 14, 2011 12:22 | #12 In another one of your threads you are talking about getting rid of your 70-200, so I would try a 135/2L instead of the 85/1.8 first to see if you really think you need wider. then get a 50/1.4 instead of your 50/1.8. Houston Wedding PhotographerBlog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
picturecrazy soft-hearted weenie-boy 8,565 posts Likes: 780 Joined Jan 2006 Location: Alberta, CANADA More info | Jun 14, 2011 15:55 | #13 Excellent lens. Yes, it has purple fringes wide open, but so does the 85L, except it's worse on the L. At least, mine was worse. It is fantastic on crop or FF, I use it a lot on both. -Lloyd
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Valjoy Senior Member 459 posts Joined Sep 2008 Location: Australia More info | Jun 15, 2011 00:05 | #14 Love my 85 1.8. Very fast auto focus. Sharp as a tack. Beautiful bokeh. These pluses far outway the purple fringe I sometimes encounter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1626 guests, 181 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||