too bad 25mm f0.95 on 2x crop is about like 50mm f2 on FF or 30mm f1.4 on APS-C. Kinda kills a lot of the magic.
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jun 15, 2011 16:02 | #16 too bad 25mm f0.95 on 2x crop is about like 50mm f2 on FF or 30mm f1.4 on APS-C. Kinda kills a lot of the magic. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JasonC do I need to submit a resume...? More info | Jun 15, 2011 16:22 | #17 tkbslc wrote in post #12599504 too bad 25mm f0.95 on 2x crop is about like 50mm f2 on FF or 30mm f1.4 on APS-C. Kinda kills a lot of the magic. True. Equipment & Feedback
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 16, 2011 01:19 | #18 randomlinh wrote in post #12591029 adorma is doing pre-orders. $599. Samples seem to make it look really nice: google translated from omuser Impressive, The Bokeh is really good on it, nice and silky, And it appears quite sharp, Which is equally impressive Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimmyDude911 Senior Member 774 posts Likes: 4 Joined May 2011 Location: Texas More info | Jun 16, 2011 22:45 | #19 a bit off topic but is there a way to get that Voigtlander 25mm on my 50D? haha Canon EOS 5D Mark ii | Canon 50/1.4 |Rokinon 85/1.4 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 16, 2011 22:47 | #20 JimmyDude911 wrote in post #12607520 a bit off topic but is there a way to get that Voigtlander 25mm on my 50D? haha haven't seen an adapter anywhere No, micro 4/3 has a VERY short flange to sensor distance, there is no way to mount a micro 4/3 lens like that on any SLR camera because of the mirror.... Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimmyDude911 Senior Member 774 posts Likes: 4 Joined May 2011 Location: Texas More info | Jun 16, 2011 22:52 | #21 what a shame :/ Canon EOS 5D Mark ii | Canon 50/1.4 |Rokinon 85/1.4 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 16, 2011 22:53 | #22 JimmyDude911 wrote in post #12607560 what a shame :/ Dont be so upset, as mentioned above, the DoF characteristic of a 25mm f/0.95 on micro 4/3 is equal to a 30mm f/1.4 on your 50D Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimmyDude911 Senior Member 774 posts Likes: 4 Joined May 2011 Location: Texas More info | Jun 16, 2011 22:55 | #23 that's true. Canon EOS 5D Mark ii | Canon 50/1.4 |Rokinon 85/1.4 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 16, 2011 23:17 | #24 It gets into a long and complicated discussion, But basically, smaller the sensor, the larger the aperture needed to achieve isolation Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JimmyDude911 Senior Member 774 posts Likes: 4 Joined May 2011 Location: Texas More info | Jun 16, 2011 23:23 | #25 interesting stuff. most things in photography get into a long and complicated discussion haha Canon EOS 5D Mark ii | Canon 50/1.4 |Rokinon 85/1.4 |
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shoturtle Goldmember 1,187 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: NYC/Frankfurt A.M. More info | Jun 16, 2011 23:25 | #26 With the m4/3 correction, the current 20 1.7 pancake is very close in performance. Is that 1/3 of a stop really worth it for a lens that is so close in FL. Traveling is my passion, so I am a major Frequent Flyer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 17, 2011 00:03 | #27 shoturtle wrote in post #12607781 With the m4/3 correction, the current 20 1.7 pancake is very close in performance. Is that 1/3 of a stop really worth it for a lens that is so close in FL. But there are others coming form oly a 45 1.8 for 299 and a 12 f2, more primes for m4/3. There are more interesting for someone that has the 20 1.7 already. ^- indeed.... Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
randomlinh Senior Member 992 posts Joined Jul 2006 Location: Maryland More info | Jun 17, 2011 10:40 | #28 shoturtle wrote in post #12607781 With the m4/3 correction, the current 20 1.7 pancake is very close in performance. Is that 1/3 of a stop really worth it for a lens that is so close in FL. But there are others coming form oly a 45 1.8 for 299 and a 12 f2, more primes for m4/3. There are more interesting for someone that has the 20 1.7 already. where'd you hear about a 45/1.8 for 299? That makes me a little wary.. I want to see something like the new PL25, but in the form of a fast 45-50 (that's not the current PL45 macro). At $300, I feel they may have skimped on the build (hopefully not the IQ, olympus really should be able to pump out some awesome glass)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 17, 2011 12:01 | #29 randomlinh wrote in post #12609782 where'd you hear about a 45/1.8 for 299? That makes me a little wary.. I want to see something like the new PL25, but in the form of a fast 45-50 (that's not the current PL45 macro). At $300, I feel they may have skimped on the build (hopefully not the IQ, olympus really should be able to pump out some awesome glass) i might be wrong but isnt the 45 f/1.8 that Retro-ish lens they showed off? Gear, New and Old! RAW Club Member
LOG IN TO REPLY |
shoturtle Goldmember 1,187 posts Joined Oct 2010 Location: NYC/Frankfurt A.M. More info | Jun 17, 2011 13:18 | #30 4 3 rumors had it, it is not a pancake. So it will be a bit simpler to make, allowing oly to keep the cost down. randomlinh wrote in post #12609782 where'd you hear about a 45/1.8 for 299? That makes me a little wary.. I want to see something like the new PL25, but in the form of a fast 45-50 (that's not the current PL45 macro). At $300, I feel they may have skimped on the build (hopefully not the IQ, olympus really should be able to pump out some awesome glass) Traveling is my passion, so I am a major Frequent Flyer.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1871 guests, 106 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||