Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 15 Oct 2005 (Saturday) 06:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

580EX on camera Master with 420EX Slave

 
dmwierz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,376 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Chicago Area, IL
     
Oct 15, 2005 06:39 |  #1

Easy question: I'm going to use my 580 on camera as a master on-camera with a 420 as a slave set off to the side on a tripod (as a key light).

If I set the 580 to "A" and the 420 to "B" as the instructions say, and I set the ratio to 1:3, say, what is 1 and what is 3? Plus, if I use the on camera flash for fill, and it's 3 times further away than the 420, what should the ratio be? 1:3 or 3:1, and what does this mean?

For portraiture, is there any value to using Omnibounces and bouncing flash or should I jst fire straight on? How about for interior work?

Phew!

Thanks


http://www.denniswierz​bicki.com (external link)
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/dmwierz (external link)

Dennis "
Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Oct 15, 2005 07:13 |  #2

1:3 means that your B flash will be 1 1/2 stops brighter on the subject than the A flash.

Since ETTL will account for the distance of the flashes (within limits), it doesn't matter how far the flashes are from the subject. What matters is how much light falls on the subject and as long as the flashes are near enough so that the set amount of light falls on the subject, distance will not enter into the equation.

For portraits, diffused lighting is always preferrable to straight headon flashes, I think.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 15, 2005 17:56 |  #3

My portable setup is a 550EX on a light stand, with an umbrella, and a naked flash on the camera (which I might get around to diffusing one day). I usually use a 1:3 ratio, but I experiment between 1:2 and 1:8 depending what i'm doing.

The best thing to do is plan and see what happens.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beardo
Member
47 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Australia
     
Oct 16, 2005 02:58 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #4

PacAce wrote:
Since ETTL will account for the distance of the flashes (within limits), it doesn't matter how far the flashes are from the subject.
.

I was under the impression that flash to subject distance would affect ratios. The pre flash fires them all evenly and determines what total output is required, then tells each slave group what part of the required output to fire at. So a ratio of 1:3 (A:B) If B is further away you will (depending on distance) get a ratio more like 1:2 or 1:1.


Canon 10d, 15mm fishey, 24-85 usm, 100-300usm 50mm f 1.8 580ex, 550ex, 420ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 16, 2005 03:09 |  #5

I'm with pacace on this one, I don't think subject distance is relevant since ETTL takes that into account.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmwierz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,376 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Chicago Area, IL
     
Oct 16, 2005 07:00 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #6

tim wrote:
I'm with pacace on this one, I don't think subject distance is relevant since ETTL takes that into account.

Guys, thanks for the replies, however the confusion that exists even in this thread is why I am in such a quandary.

I'll stay tuned...

Dennis


http://www.denniswierz​bicki.com (external link)
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/dmwierz (external link)

Dennis "
Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 16, 2005 08:18 |  #7

Good explanation here


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Oct 16, 2005 08:37 as a reply to  @ dmwierz's post |  #8

dmwierz wrote:
Guys, thanks for the replies, however the confusion that exists even in this thread is why I am in such a quandary.

I'll stay tuned...

Dennis

With wireless remote, there are two ways you can do it. In full ETTL auto mode, in which case distance will not enter into the equation (within the lmits of the flash's working distance) because it has already been accounted for by ETTL. And then there's manaul wireless mode. Here, you control the flash ratios by setting the strength of each flash independently. And in this case, distance is an important factor because flash strength varies with distance. However, the 420EX can not be set to manual mode so it can't be used as a manual wireless slave.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmwierz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,376 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Chicago Area, IL
     
Oct 16, 2005 08:40 as a reply to  @ PacAce's post |  #9

PacAce wrote:
With wireless remote, there are two ways you can do it. In full ETTL auto mode, in which case distance will not enter into the equation (within the lmits of the flash's working distance) because it has already been accounted for by ETTL. And then there's manaul wireless mode. Here, you control the flash ratios by setting the strength of each flash independently. And in this case, distance is an important factor because flash strength varies with distance. However, the 420EX can not be set to manual mode so it can't be used as a manual wireless slave.

Ace, so in ETTL, do I NOT set the ratio? Or do I set it to 1:1?


http://www.denniswierz​bicki.com (external link)
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/dmwierz (external link)

Dennis "
Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PacAce
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
26,900 posts
Likes: 40
Joined Feb 2003
Location: Keystone State, USA
     
Oct 16, 2005 14:58 as a reply to  @ dmwierz's post |  #10

dmwierz wrote:
Ace, so in ETTL, do I NOT set the ratio? Or do I set it to 1:1?

Well, whether you want to use ratios or not depends on how you want the different flashes to interact with each other. For example, you might want to take a portrait shot with the key lighting about 1 to 2 stop brighter then the fill lighting. In this case, you will need to set the ratio to something other than 1:1, otherwise you are going to end up with flat lighting.

If you haven't already, take a look at the link that Rene provided above. You'll find more helpful info on ratios there.


...Leo

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
beardo
Member
47 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Australia
     
Oct 16, 2005 20:11 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #11

tim wrote:
I'm with pacace on this one, I don't think subject distance is relevant since ETTL takes that into account.

After reading up on it some more as well as doing some test shots of my own I've realised flash to subject distance is accounted for and wont affect raitios. My bad


Canon 10d, 15mm fishey, 24-85 usm, 100-300usm 50mm f 1.8 580ex, 550ex, 420ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 16, 2005 21:39 as a reply to  @ beardo's post |  #12

beardo wrote:
After reading up on it some more as well as doing some test shots of my own I've realised flash to subject distance is accounted for and wont affect raitios. My bad

We're all here to learn :)


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,447 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
580EX on camera Master with 420EX Slave
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1092 guests, 112 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.