GregoryF Goldmember  2,336 posts Likes: 13 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Bella Vista, AR More info | Jun 15, 2011 14:01 | #16 [QUOTE=Forgottenalarm;12598681]Can you post a pic? i cant find any pics from this lens and from what i see on amazon its close to the same price of the 100-400 6D, 5D, 7Dii, Eos R and too many lenses, flashes and aux. gear to list!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xanavi Member  174 posts Joined Jun 2011 Location: Markham More info | Jun 15, 2011 14:02 | #17 with a crop camera and sensor, everything seems to be odd. I rather have this lens on a full frame camera to have a better picture. My 2 cents.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 15, 2011 14:17 | #18 xanavi wrote in post #12598747  with a crop camera and sensor, everything seems to be odd. I rather have this lens on a full frame camera to have a better picture. My 2 cents. I don't have the money for a full body and the t3i has potential to make excellent pics when you know how to use it. "Its All Fun And Games Until You Lose An Eye
LOG IN TO REPLY |
xanavi Member 174 posts Joined Jun 2011 Location: Markham More info | Jun 15, 2011 14:20 | #19 Forgottenalarm wrote in post #12598840 I don't have the money for a full body and the t3i has potential to make excellent pics when you know how to use it. Go for Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 non-VC if you are tight in budget or if you got some small cash, get a Sigma 17-50mm OS and if you really don't care about $$$, go for a Canon 17-55mm 2.8.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mco_970 Senior Member 350 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2009 Location: SW Colorado More info | Jun 15, 2011 15:29 | #20 Xavier, did you even read the original post? OP was asking for "thier opinions for a holdable/tripod wildlife/bird lens for my camera". Michelle - 7D, 40 STM, 400 f/5.6, 500 f/4.5, NEX, and going Nikon FF - eager to see what 7D2 brings!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 15, 2011 16:16 | #21 GregoryF wrote in post #12598739 Look in the lens archive sample images in this forum (the link is at the top of the page in the lens section. You can find many samples of all of the above mentioned lenses, plus dicussions on them. Never noticed it there, thanks. i like the sigmonster, but 8 grand wont find its way to me prolly ever. Ido really like the 100-400l more now that i have seen more pics. doing the math with my cropped sensor 400x1.6=640 640 with a 2x tube will get me 1280? hell yeah!!!!! "Its All Fun And Games Until You Lose An Eye
LOG IN TO REPLY |
philwillmedia Cream of the Crop 5,253 posts Gallery: 2 photos Likes: 25 Joined Nov 2008 Location: "...just south of the 23rd Paralell..." More info | Jun 15, 2011 16:31 | #22 The OP asks specifically about the 100-400L or something similar... Forgottenalarm wrote in post #12594407 I really like the 100-400mml but then stumbled into the is problem thread... ...Does sigma offer something else that would be better for me? How is suggesting xanavi wrote in post #12598858 Go for Tamron 17-50mm 2.8 non-VC if you are tight in budget or if you got some small cash, get a Sigma 17-50mm OS and if you really don't care about $$$, go for a Canon 17-55mm 2.8. even close to being similar? Regards, Phil
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 16, 2011 09:52 | #23 I have decided to stay with the 100-400MM L. thanks guys. "Its All Fun And Games Until You Lose An Eye
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1051 guests, 157 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
