really not much crazier than a $1600 + prime but I would only consider it if the price drops a bit and if its crazy good. For now I am pretty much keeping what I have.
Aug 03, 2012 14:26 | #61 really not much crazier than a $1600 + prime but I would only consider it if the price drops a bit and if its crazy good. For now I am pretty much keeping what I have. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KOPop Member  159 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2010 Location: Mid-Atlantic More info | Aug 03, 2012 14:28 | #62 Tommydigi wrote in post #14810209  really not much crazier than a $1600 + prime but I would only consider it if the price drops a bit and if its crazy good. For now I am pretty much keeping what I have. true, but 1.2 bokeh and that sort of glass is a different story.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 03, 2012 14:36 | #63 We shall see, I like that its lighter and if its in the same league as the 70-300L, 70-200 2.8 IS II I am sure it will be awesome. I am sure that price will drop just like the 70-200 did. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2766 guests, 152 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
