Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 18 Jun 2011 (Saturday) 00:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Understanding B+W filter model differences?

 
Headshotzx
Goldmember
Avatar
4,488 posts
Likes: 141
Joined Dec 2007
Location: Singapore
     
Jun 18, 2011 00:25 |  #1

So I'm in the market to buy filters for my zoom lenses since I've gotten the habit of not using the bulky hoods indoors (I know, bad move, but the space savings are important to me).

But then I come across lots of different types of UV filters, and it boggles my mind.

From a test done not too long ago, I remember that the Hoya HMC UV came up top for % of visible light passing through, and that is still the cheapest. However, many people are still recommending the B+W's so I figured I should take a look.

They are to be put on my 24-70 and 70-200mm lenses, and so any usual thickness should work.

So to cut to the chase, assuming it's all UV HAZE 001 MRC, what's the practical difference between "F-Pro", "XS-Pro", "Nano"?

And, just because it's a B+W filter thread... anyone can really tell me the practical differences between their CPL and CPL KSM filters?

Cheers!
Zexun


Zexun | Flickr (external link) | YouTube (external link) |

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
monk3y
Totally Saturated
Avatar
46,207 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Cloud and Honey
     
Jun 18, 2011 00:34 |  #2

I just got myself a BW XS-PRO Clear 007M filter, I got it over the UV coz I need the filter for protection more than anything else... and as far as I know, XS-PRO is thinner than the F-Pro.. good for wide angle lenses

and looks like all XS-Pro specially the UV ones are already Nano coated


www.monk3y.com (external link) | My GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DarthSparky
Senior Member
Avatar
510 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Surrey, UK
     
Jun 18, 2011 02:34 |  #3

I have F-Pro's on all my lenses as protection (010 UV MRCs). I didn't want to spend a ton of money on L glass and then not put a top class filter on it, and my research pointed to B+W being right up there. The filters are excellent, and very easy to clean.

I also have a slim fit CPL KSM filter. It is outstanding, although I have not tried the normal B+W CPL so can't offer any comparisons. The slim fit does not have the depth to allow a lenses cap to be used, which would annoy me lots if i was using the filter primarily for protection.


Rich | 1DX | Gripped 5D2 | 17-40 4L | 24-105 4L IS | 70-200 2.8L IS II | 85 1.2L II | 100 2.8L Macro IS | 600EX-RT | Gear List | www.richbaileyphotogra​phy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sirrith
Cream of the Crop
10,545 posts
Gallery: 50 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 36
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Hong Kong
     
Jun 18, 2011 02:55 |  #4

I use F-Pro's as well. Don't see the point of getting the XS-Pro because they're more expensive (slimmer), I don't stack, and a single F-Pro doesn't cause any vignetting even on my 10-22.


-Tom
Flickr (external link)
F-Stop Guru review | RRS BH-40 review

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
peter_n
Goldmember
Avatar
2,483 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 124
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Boston, USA
     
Jun 18, 2011 09:04 |  #5

DarthSparky wrote in post #12614164 (external link)
I have F-Pro's on all my lenses as protection (010 UV MRCs).

+1.


~Peter

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tvphotog
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,094 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 37
Joined Aug 2007
Location: New York City
     
Jun 18, 2011 10:45 |  #6

DarthSparky wrote in post #12614164 (external link)
I have F-Pro's on all my lenses as protection (010 UV MRCs). I didn't want to spend a ton of money on L glass and then not put a top class filter on it, and my research pointed to B+W being right up there. The filters are excellent, and very easy to clean.

After having bought B+W UV filters for all my lenses, I've recently come to the conclusion that IQ is more important to me than protection from I don't know what. And there's vignetting to watch out for on wide lenses. I now shoot without protective filters.

I use a hood all the time on all the lenses, and am careful with cleaning, always having a clean microfiber cloth with me on shooting, and lens papers at home.

But I agree that if you use a filter, use a B+W.


Jay
Ireland in Word and Image (external link) Jay Ben Images (external link)5D IV | 5DS/R | Sony RX100 V | 24-105L | 100-400 IIL | 16-35 f/2.8 IIL | 24 T/S f /3.5L II | 17 T/S f/4L | 50mm f/1.2L | 35mm f/1.4L | 70-200 f/2.8L II | 580 EX II | 600 EX-RT | Feisol 3441T/Markins Q3T lever QR | Gitzo 3542L Markins Qi20 BV-22 | Gitzo 5561T RRS MH-02

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

7,974 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Understanding B+W filter model differences?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1339 guests, 132 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.