Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 18 Jun 2011 (Saturday) 23:25
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Knowing that UV filters do degrade IQ, do you still use one?

 
j-dogg
Goldmember
1,292 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Apr 2011
     
Jun 19, 2011 09:05 as a reply to  @ post 12619517 |  #16

Some of the best photographs in the world were taken 100 years ago on glass plates with Charmin ultra-soft optics. Practice composition and lighting, then worry about sharp pictures.

I shoot without my filters on and hoods attached unless the situation requires them.


5D / 400d / 70-200-4LIS / 50 Mk.I / 28-70
RB67 Pro-S / 50-90-180 Holy Trinity, 120/polaroid back
Graphic View I 4x5 / Schneider 180 / Meyer 135 / Ektar 127

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tommydigi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,916 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 844
Joined May 2010
Location: Chicago
     
Jun 19, 2011 09:15 |  #17

nikesupremedunk wrote in post #12618788 (external link)
my hoya pro 1 digital mrc and b+w f-pro mrc do not "degrade" IQ. at least as far as i can tell. and i like having that added protection against dust and whatever filth it's exposed to even w/ the hoods on.

I use the same filters and I cannot see any difference in image quality. I generally do not use hoods so I feel more comfortable with the uv on. There is no right or wrong here but considering I have probably spent about $500 to $700 on good uvs I can see how it makes sense not to use them. It's like insurance, it's money wasted til you make a claim


Website (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Instagram (external link)
Fuji X100F • Canon EOS R6 Mark 2 • G7XII • RF 16 2.8 • RF 14-35 F4 L • RF 35 1.8 • RF 800 F11 • EF 24LII L • EF 50 L • EF 100 L • EF 135 L • EF 100-400 L II • 600EX II RT • 270 EX II

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwicaksana
Senior Member
Avatar
456 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
     
Jun 19, 2011 11:17 |  #18

Tommydigi wrote in post #12619560 (external link)
It's like insurance, it's money wasted til you make a claim

Well said, Tommy! bw!


Cheers! :D
Jonathan's Gear List and flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
howzitboy
Goldmember
2,948 posts
Joined May 2007
Location: Hawaii
     
Jun 19, 2011 12:35 |  #19

mine stay on all the time, im wedding photographer who has to shoot rain or shine in all kinds of locations (mostly beaches). id rather wipe my lens filter off then the front element of my expensive lens any day.


http://onehourwedding.​blogspot.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hbomb69
Senior Member
Avatar
255 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 3
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Lancashire, UK
     
Jun 19, 2011 15:03 as a reply to  @ j-dogg's post |  #20

nope, no filters for me, bought them and then removed them.. as long as your using a hood and are sensible with the exposure of the front glass to the elements, i dont see the need for UV filters.:(


CANON 5D MKIII x 2 / CANON 50D / CANON 550D
http://www.michaelhard​castle.co.uk (external link)
Facebook.com/michaelha​rdcastlephotography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
muusers
Goldmember
Avatar
1,024 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: Haarlem, Netherlands
     
Jun 19, 2011 15:21 |  #21

Yes. Hoya HD on all of my lenses. I'll take on anyone who clames to see any difference. :P

all joking aside, it makes me feel more ensured. And it keeps the dust out of my 17-55. Pictures are still sharp, and I havent encountered any problems with flares.


50D + 17-55 | s100 | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ckramos
Member
Avatar
179 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Mill Creek, WA
     
Jun 19, 2011 15:25 |  #22

In real life i use filters, peer pressure sucks for the lonely


5d2 | 580ex ii | 35-70mm f3.5-4.5 | 50mm f1.4 | 17-40mm f4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeeRatters
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,903 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9562
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Bristol, UK
     
Jun 19, 2011 15:40 |  #23

i'm sure i've replied to this before saying no i don't use them...... :)

edit - saying that, the 50mm/2.0 i bought for my film SLR used came with one!!! so maybe i do use one from time to time :D


>> Flickr << (external link)


>> Instagram<< (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chrisandaivi
Senior Member
718 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Virginia Beach
     
Jun 19, 2011 16:14 |  #24

Oh crap! I just banged my lens against a wall! And I heard a loud shatter!!! ...... Whew good thing it's only the filter.


Gear: 5D Mark II, Canon 85mm 1.2 L ,Canon 17-40mm F4L
Canon 24-70mm F2.8L, Canon 70-200mm F4L
580 exII x2
Rf602 triggers
Etc, Etc, ETC

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Invertalon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,495 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Cleveland, OH
     
Jun 19, 2011 16:22 |  #25

I use Hoya HD's on all my lenses, full time. I remove them only when I use a CPL or at night, although, I don't think the filter does much anything to increase the flare that I have seen.


-Steve
Facebook (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GregoryF
Goldmember
Avatar
2,336 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Bella Vista, AR
     
Jun 19, 2011 16:23 |  #26

chrisandaivi wrote in post #12621212 (external link)
Oh crap! I just banged my lens against a wall! And I heard a loud shatter!!! ...... Whew good thing it's only the filter.

Well......if you had a hood on you would not have heard the sound of glass!:lol:


6D, 5D, 7Dii, Eos R and too many lenses, flashes and aux. gear to list!:cool:
A simple hobby gone horribily wrong

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JonnyCache
Mostly Lurking
11 posts
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jun 19, 2011 17:51 as a reply to  @ GregoryF's post |  #27

If you buy a good filter it should not be much of a problem. I prefer to have my uv filter scratched then my lens.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
alpha_1976
Goldmember
Avatar
3,961 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2009
Location: USA
     
Jun 19, 2011 17:58 |  #28

Good filters don't necessarily degrade IQ.


I know more about gear than I know about photography :p
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RobDickinson
Goldmember
4,003 posts
Gallery: 14 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 1053
Joined Apr 2010
Location: New Zealand
     
Jun 19, 2011 19:28 |  #29

alpha_1976 wrote in post #12621657 (external link)
Good filters don't necessarily degrade IQ.

Ofcourse they do, by a noticable amount though? Under some conditions?

Theres a trade off between a UV filter and IQ and its down to you to make that choice.

Checkout lensrental.com article on UV filters.


www.HeroWorkshops.com (external link) - www.rjd.co.nz (external link) - www.zarphag.com (external link)
Gear: A7r, 6D, Irix 15mmf2.4 , canon 16-35f4L, Canon 24mm TS-E f3.5 mk2, Sigma 50mm art, 70-200f2.8L, 400L. Lee filters, iOptron IPano, Emotimo TB3, Markins, Feisol, Novoflex, Sirui. etc.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Out buying Wheaties
Avatar
7,481 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Likes: 1081
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Jun 19, 2011 20:01 |  #30

Marloon wrote in post #12618145 (external link)
Hello Everyone,

Knowing that UV Filters do degrade IQ, do you still use one? We have all spent a lot of money on filters, and now, I am starting to decide to take off all of my filters off all of my lenses...

thoughts?

Cheap UV, CPL, NG and so on filters degrade IQ - do not buy them.


M-E and ME blog (external link). Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,075 views & 0 likes for this thread, 32 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
Knowing that UV filters do degrade IQ, do you still use one?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ahmed0essam
1516 guests, 173 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.