50mm f/2.8 1:1 macro, 90mm T/S and..... a 35mm f/2.8 macro??? is that not a little short for macro work? or...a 35mm f/2.8 prime with the added bonus of macro?
Jun 23, 2011 08:22 | #1 50mm f/2.8 1:1 macro, 90mm T/S and..... a 35mm f/2.8 macro??? is that not a little short for macro work? or...a 35mm f/2.8 prime with the added bonus of macro? Gary Eaton www.garyeatonstudios.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nureality Goldmember 3,611 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2008 More info | Jun 23, 2011 08:45 | #2 Tokina has been making one for a while now. Alan "NuReality" Fronshtein
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KVNPhoto Goldmember 1,940 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia More info | Jun 23, 2011 10:49 | #3 The next TS 90 should be an L.... X-Pro1 + 18-55 f/2.8-4 OIS + 55-200 f/3.8-4.5 OIS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tgara Goldmember 2,336 posts Likes: 8 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Connecticut, USA More info | Jun 23, 2011 12:11 | #4 garyeaton wrote in post #12644081 50mm f/2.8 1:1 macro, 90mm T/S and..... a 35mm f/2.8 macro??? is that not a little short for macro work? or...a 35mm f/2.8 prime with the added bonus of macro? Where did you find this information? CanonRumors.com? Sorry, but the fellow that runs that site really knows nothing about patents, what they mean, or how they are used in commerce. EOS 5D Mark III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Jun 23, 2011 12:29 | #6 Yea where does this info come from? [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
artemisn Senior Member 426 posts Likes: 1 Joined Dec 2010 More info | Jun 23, 2011 12:31 | #7 CanonRumors indeed! Richard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
banpreso Goldmember 2,176 posts Likes: 4 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Socal More info | Jun 23, 2011 13:59 | #8 35 f2.8 macro is not exciting at all. i cannot possibly take it seriously
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jun 23, 2011 14:01 | #9 For all we know they are for a different camera system. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Invertalon Cream of the Crop 6,495 posts Likes: 24 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Cleveland, OH More info | Jun 23, 2011 14:02 | #10 Patents do not mean a lens is being produced... Companies make TONS of patents each year only to do nothing with them.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Jun 23, 2011 15:05 | #11 Invertalon wrote in post #12645708 Patents do not mean a lens is being produced... Companies make TONS of patents each year only to do nothing with them. Canon rumors is a RUMOR site. Lay off people, it's like those complaining Mcdonald's is not healthy for you. You should expect it take a few years off your life. If anything, it should be for entertainment purposes only. Geeze. Yup, yup and yup. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KVNPhoto Goldmember 1,940 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia More info | Jun 23, 2011 21:18 | #12 DreDaze wrote in post #12645196 It's funny to look at canonrumors.com and look at the previous patent announcements. Only the 70-200f2.8 II exists... And 55-250 X-Pro1 + 18-55 f/2.8-4 OIS + 55-200 f/3.8-4.5 OIS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 23, 2011 21:35 | #13 banpreso wrote in post #12645693 35 f2.8 macro is not exciting at all. i cannot possibly take it seriously Hey! Tokina 35mm f2.8 macro is too a serious lens! and oneday I might actually get out and give the lens the fielday it deserves Certainly an optically good performer, not bad at focusing either. Though yeah working distances are, tricky ![]() Tools of the trade: Canon 400D, Canon 7D, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS L M2, Sigma 120-300mm f2.8 OS, Canon MPE 65mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 150mm f2.8 macro, Tamron 24-70mm f2.4, Sigma 70mm f2.8 macro, Sigma 8-16mm f4.5-5.6, Raynox DCR 250, loads of teleconverters and a flashy thingy too
LOG IN TO REPLY |
phreeky Goldmember 3,515 posts Likes: 15 Joined Oct 2007 Location: Australia More info | Jun 23, 2011 21:48 | #14 Overread wrote in post #12648000 and oneday I might actually get out and give the lens the fielday it deserves Certainly an optically good performer, not bad at focusing either. Though yeah working distances are, tricky ![]() I want one just to play around for shots of flower fields etc. Hard to justify though, where I live it's mostly dry shrub land, rainforest, or sandy beaches.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tkbslc Cream of the Crop 24,604 posts Likes: 45 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Utah, USA More info | Jun 23, 2011 22:41 | #15 The Pentax 35mm limited is a 35mm f2.8 macro and well loved by the Pentax crowd. Taylor
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1059 guests, 115 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||