I know this is probably a somewhat strange question.. but given my current list (not including the 28-135, it's receiving a new home tomorrow), if I were needing to do any macro photography, which of the lenses in my sig would be suitable?
Thanks!
Mistabernie 'Camera Unicorn McSparkles'.. More info | Jun 23, 2011 10:59 | #1 I know this is probably a somewhat strange question.. but given my current list (not including the 28-135, it's receiving a new home tomorrow), if I were needing to do any macro photography, which of the lenses in my sig would be suitable? Donate if you love POTN! | Smugmug
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Roljerj Member 203 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: Wisconsin More info | Jun 23, 2011 11:30 | #2 Your 50mm with extension tubes would probably make due, or your 70-200 with a close up filter. I haven't really used close up filters much so I can't vouch for them though. 5DII, 7D, EF 50 1.4, EF 85 1.8, 100L Macro, 135L[COLOR=black], 400L 5.6, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-300L, 15-85 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Saint728 Goldmember 2,892 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jun 2009 Location: Honolulu Hawaii More info | Jun 23, 2011 15:02 | #3 I would go with the Sigma 17-50 with a reverse ring adapter or the 70-200mm with an extension tube. Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III | 17-40mm f/4.0L | 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro | 300mm f/4.0L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TuanTime Senior Member 759 posts Likes: 1 Joined May 2009 More info | How much magnification do you want? And what kind of macro? Small insects? Large insects? Flowers? As mentioned your best bet is probably the 50mm with a set of extension tubes.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ben_r_ -POTN's Three legged Support- 15,894 posts Likes: 13 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Sacramento, CA More info | Jun 23, 2011 15:20 | #5 Depends on how much magnification you want, but right off the bat, Id suggest the 50mm with extension tubes. [Gear List | Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CountryBoy "Tired of Goldmember label" 5,168 posts Joined May 2006 Location: Okie More info | Jun 23, 2011 15:47 | #6 I think it's time for you to buy a new lens . Hi
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cc10d Senior Member 812 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2004 Location: Oregon, USA More info | Jun 23, 2011 19:54 | #7 Yeh! like the canon 100mm f 2.8 macro. Good macro with some working distance between the lens and the subject. This point is often overlooked until folks find that for 1:1 they are on top to the subject and if its alive, it gone. cc
LOG IN TO REPLY |
wombatHorror Goldmember 1,937 posts Joined Sep 2010 Location: NJ More info | Jun 23, 2011 19:56 | #8 Mistabernie wrote in post #12644781 I know this is probably a somewhat strange question.. but given my current list (not including the 28-135, it's receiving a new home tomorrow), if I were needing to do any macro photography, which of the lenses in my sig would be suitable? Thanks! maybe the 70-200 with extension tubes or the 50 likewise
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Winwin Senior Member 702 posts Likes: 3 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada More info | Jun 23, 2011 20:21 | #9 17-50 or 50mm with extension tubes. Win.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
troypiggo Goldmember 4,743 posts Likes: 172 Joined Jun 2007 Location: Brisbane, AUSTRALIA More info | Jun 23, 2011 20:28 | #10 What's your definition of macro photography? 1:1 lifesize? Something like the dragonfly shot above, which is not 1:1? Insects, flowers, or jewellery? The answer will depend on the above to at least some extent. "Interesting. You're afraid of insects and women. Ladybugs must render you catatonic." - Sheldon
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1599 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||