MikeLuter Mostly Lurking  13 posts Joined Mar 2011 More info | Jun 24, 2011 20:20 | #1 Here's a image I did a couple weeks ago as part of a portfolio shoot update. All of the lighting on these  My New Blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 24, 2011 20:20 | #2 ** This should probably be in the glamour / fashion area, but it says I don't have permission to post there.What are the requirements? My New Blog
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OneEyedJack Senior Member 608 posts Joined May 2007 More info | Jun 24, 2011 21:06 | #3 Post number 2 of this thread explains everything you need to know
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 24, 2011 21:15 | #4 |
Mitch.A Goldmember  1,476 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2010 Location: Montreal More info | Jun 24, 2011 21:30 | #5 That's a beautiful shot , my only critique is that the right cheek doesn't look right / over processed , could be my monitor though NOTE: The process for early access may take FOUR WEEKS or longer to hear back from us, so please be patient. We grant this "early access" only to those with images to post. We do NOT grant early access to those looking to comment on images at this time. Again, to gain Early access you must be prepared with sample images or a gallery that meets the genre. Here's How. Contact tommykjensen via PM. This PM must include three things. 1."Quote" the Glamor Forum rules found in the first post in this thread, and state that you have read and understand, and are going to abide by those rules. 2. Re-read the Forums general rules,. (which you can find here; https://photography-on-the.net/forum/rules.php ) ..and again in the PM you send, state that you have read these rules and understand them and will abide by them. 2a. Item 2 includes the image posting rules which apply in all forums. Link. 3. Provide Links or attach some sample images of your work to show that you have images ready to post in the G&N Forum. Note: the photos must be on a public viewable website. I am not going to register on any sites in order to review photos. YOUR PM Must include all of the Above. If it does not meet the criteria it will be ignored (no reply) so get it right. Facebook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
OneEyedJack Senior Member 608 posts Joined May 2007 More info | Jun 24, 2011 21:39 | #6 |
BrickR Cream of the Crop 5,935 posts Likes: 115 Joined Mar 2011 Location: Dallas TX More info | Jun 24, 2011 23:30 | #7 Wow, really nice shot! My junk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 25, 2011 12:29 | #8 Nice job. http://gallerytx.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Byoung Member  90 posts Joined Feb 2008 Location: Cold Canadian North More info | Jun 25, 2011 12:43 | #9 Great shot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
domat Senior Member 485 posts Likes: 14 Joined Jun 2010 Location: New York More info | Jun 25, 2011 12:54 | #10 looks great
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1downfall Goldmember  4,059 posts Likes: 5 Joined Nov 2007 Location: virginia beach, va More info | Jun 25, 2011 20:02 | #11 I like everything about this shot...except the blue vase/decoration thing on the wall. It has much more contrast to me than she does, as pretty as she is, I am drawn back to the vase thing. I think that this shot here, fits. Glamor here is ok IMO as long as it does not show to much...and this one to me, does not. Bill
LOG IN TO REPLY |
windpig Chopped liver  More info | Jun 25, 2011 21:13 | #12 I like the shot except I find the blue vase distracting. I think the right check looks weird because it looks concave compared to the other because of how the hair is laying against it. Would you like to buy a vowel?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nickc84 Goldmember  2,064 posts Likes: 80 Joined Jul 2010 More info | Jun 26, 2011 12:07 | #13 Makes me mad that I had to sell my 85mm 1.8 to fund my 5d II. Its all good ...I have the plastic fantastic to mess around with until I re buy the 85mm. or 50mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
surgeonhawkeye Goldmember  More info | Jun 28, 2011 13:55 | #14 nICE PHOTO, WELL DONE I love this
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mrjames Junior Member 20 posts Joined Jun 2011 More info | Jun 28, 2011 14:02 | #15 too many distractions, the vase, the leaves in the foreground, the leaves growing out of her head, hands look a little blown out, and you might want to think about moving the light a little more off axis to give the form more modelling- looks a little flat IMO
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2825 guests, 165 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
