Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
Thread started 25 Jun 2011 (Saturday) 16:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

S95 and chromatic aberration - anyone else?

 
imhotep
Senior Member
Avatar
336 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
     
Jun 25, 2011 16:17 |  #1

I've been shooting with an S95 for about a month and I'm curious if other S95 owners have noticed a problem with CA. Here are some examples:

This is Cable's Mill in Cades Cove, Great Smoky Mountains NP, Tennessee.

100% crop, RAW processed straight to JPEG:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


100% crop after desaturating blue and magenta:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Final processed image:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


There's still loads of yellow fringing but the worst is dealt with. That might seem like an unusual case but it's actually very typical of what I'm seeing in the daytime photos I took during a week in Smokies. It shows up on just about any back-lit subject and reeked havoc on landscapes with even the smallest amount of filtered daylight, such as around leaves and branches. Another example...

This is near the summit of Mt Cammerer, Great Smoky Mountains NP, Tennesse.

100% crop, RAW processed straight to JPEG:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


100% crop after desaturating blue and magenta:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


Final processed image:

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


In this case desaturating only replaced the problem with a less annoying one....sort of. Instead of bright blue branches I get solid gray ones....

Maybe I'm asking too much of a tiny point-n-shoot lens, but I consider this a fairly obnoxious amount of CA. I bought an S95 after deciding to take a break from lugging my DSLR + lenses all over the place. Having a lightweight camera on my hip has been great for hikes and sight-seeing but I'm afraid this is the price you pay with the S95 and possibly others in the same 'league'.

Feel free to tell me "what did you expect, go back to bigger glass if you don't like it". I was just a bit surprised given the S95 is a more serious PNS. Desaturating has proven effective on this images which are loaded with greens and browns, but what if I'm shooting a red barn or a scene with more blues? That subject matter would be neutered along with the CA using this technique.

Curthttp://www.opticalsupp​orts.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elogical
Goldmember
Avatar
1,217 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: St Paul, Minnesota
     
Jun 25, 2011 16:58 |  #2

I compared your shots to some of mine and that looks to be a typical amount of CA for that kinda strongly backlit shot.

I don't mess around with a whole lot of manual adjusting on it most of the time, I just use the automatic lens correction from lightroom with the CA adjustment on the default level. I have it set to do lens correction automatic on all my imports so on a lot of the shots, I never realized how bad the original was until going to look.

It doesn't get rid of all of it by any means but it gets it down to a manageable level that I hardly notice on the full shot. It'd take a lot of adjusting to get some of the back-lot shots to a level where they are usable at 100% though.


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkbslc
Cream of the Crop
24,604 posts
Likes: 45
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Utah, USA
     
Jun 25, 2011 21:07 |  #3

I had some on the S90, but if you use the free DPP program that comes with the camera to process the RAW files, there is a quick couple click fix in there.


Taylor
Galleries: Flickr (external link)
EOS Rp | iPhone 11 Pro Max

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
imhotep
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
336 posts
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
     
Jun 26, 2011 18:26 as a reply to  @ tkbslc's post |  #4

Thanks for the feedback. I'll look into the DPP program it comes with. Right now I'm processing all of my RAW files with UFRaw and post-processing in GIMP 2.


Curthttp://www.opticalsupp​orts.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
elogical
Goldmember
Avatar
1,217 posts
Joined Aug 2010
Location: St Paul, Minnesota
     
Jun 26, 2011 21:03 |  #5

It's been a while since I've used gimp, I wonder if you can find or make a profile for the CA correction and save it as an action to apply


Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PaulRivers
Member
193 posts
Joined Sep 2010
     
Jun 28, 2011 12:38 |  #6

What's the exif info on those photos?

I've found that I am seemingly randomly getting some photos like that with noticeable chromatic aberration - but then in other photos I'll take nearly the exact same kind of shot and get very very little. There's a specific photo I have in mind that's several tree branches against a blue sky that has almost none...but then I have another that's also tree branches and leaves against the sky that's absolutely terrible, even at screen size.

My current theory (that I haven't gotten around to testing yet) is that maybe you get more chromatic aberration at f2.0 than you do at f4.0...just the theory I've been mulling around in my head...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edofloat
Senior Member
Avatar
848 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 34
Joined Oct 2010
Location: Up North.
     
Jun 28, 2011 12:40 |  #7

PaulRivers wrote in post #12671661 (external link)
My current theory (that I haven't gotten around to testing yet) is that maybe you get more chromatic aberration at f2.0 than you do at f4.0...just the theory I've been mulling around in my head...

Yeah, it seems like there is more CA at f/2.0 for sure.


|Gear | Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeFairbanks
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jun 28, 2011 13:08 |  #8

I grew up in CA, so I like it.

;)


Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,578 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
S95 and chromatic aberration - anyone else?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Small Compact Digitals by Canon 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
1163 guests, 154 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.