The couple shot in B&W. CC are appreciated.
ohtography Senior Member 278 posts Joined Mar 2011 More info | Jun 27, 2011 04:05 | #1 |
Jun 27, 2011 22:02 | #2 Nobody? mmm i can take a strong critiques
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SUB1IM388 Cream of the Crop 8,553 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Rapid City, SD More info | I like them you lighting is spot on
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2011 20:32 | #4 Thanks Danny!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MichaelBottoms Cream of the Crop 6,297 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Whitby Ontario... just outside of Toronto More info | Jun 28, 2011 20:46 | #5 Ok... I'll try and make a constructive comment. I love your lighting, but I'm not 100% happy with the pose in the first shot. She's great, but you show too much of his back--which isn't a strong feature for him. I think if you had moved so she was more of the focus and he was a little more hidden D(i.e. you moved to the left or you had him turn a little more to the right) that the shot would have been better. I like the second shot, but I think the first could have been even better with those small changes. Still, take my thoughts with a large grain of sand... lol All the best! Former Pentax & 20D owner... now the pleased owner of the new 50D, 580EX, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, Canon EF-S 60mm Macro, Canon EFS 17-85mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Kenko 1.4X Teleplus Pro 300, Sekonic L-508 Zoom Master Meter, Manfrotto and slik tripods, trekpod and other assorted accessories...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 29, 2011 02:01 | #6 Michael: Thanks sooo much!! yes, i agree with you. I should have hidden his back a bit more on the first pose. Posing like this is quite new to me, really need to work harder next time. Your thoughts are precious! Really appreciate it!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 29, 2011 02:28 | #7 Here is the one with his back slip a bit to the side. Maybe better?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 29, 2011 02:30 | #8 Quite a hard pose since he is too tall and she was on her high heels already.. i need to learn this stuff better! Any tips are welcome for more knowledge here.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
MichaelBottoms Cream of the Crop 6,297 posts Joined Jan 2007 Location: Whitby Ontario... just outside of Toronto More info | Jun 29, 2011 14:49 | #9 ohtography wrote in post #12675533 Here is the one with his back slip a bit to the side. Maybe better? ![]() ohtography wrote in post #12675540 Quite a hard pose since he is too tall and she was on her high heels already.. i need to learn this stuff better! Any tips are welcome for more knowledge here. I think this one is better though I'd be inclined to move his back even more... For the height discrepancy, a small stool that she might stand on or a phone book--might make it easier to match their heights. Neither would show in the photo. You do very nice work you know! Former Pentax & 20D owner... now the pleased owner of the new 50D, 580EX, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, Canon EF-S 60mm Macro, Canon EFS 17-85mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Canon EF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 IS USM, Kenko 1.4X Teleplus Pro 300, Sekonic L-508 Zoom Master Meter, Manfrotto and slik tripods, trekpod and other assorted accessories...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 29, 2011 19:41 | #10 she has a gorgeous belly, I personally would have kept a black tee shirt on him though, the second shot would have been better with her hands low on the belly, one of his arms across her breast and the other one spread on the belly the way it is. "You know an odd feeling? Sitting on the toilet eating a chocolate candy bar."
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 30, 2011 10:34 | #11 Michael and K-Style: Thankssss so much! This really helps me a lot!! Really appreacite it!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2473 guests, 121 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||