Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 28 Jun 2011 (Tuesday) 08:49
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Where did I goof?

 
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Jun 28, 2011 08:49 |  #1

Not long ago I had a family session that was a first for me 3 times over: first family group of such a large size, first family session of African American ( or black American, or People of Color,whichever you feel most PC :) ), first time using OCF for family session.

This image I am posting is SOOC and representative of the problem I saw in many of my shots-- the shadow on faces. I had two flashes, camera left & right. Did I have them too far to the sides and not enough to the front? Any other suggestions to improve very welcome!

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png' | Redirected to error image by ZENFOLIO PROTECTED

Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MDJAK
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
24,745 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 204
Joined Nov 2004
Location: New York
     
Jun 28, 2011 09:02 |  #2

It's really not that bad, but shooting black people wearing white shirts, or white people wearing black shirts is not easy. You kept good detail in their clothing, the skin looks properly exposed.

Looks as if you had the flashes too far to the side and thus created strong shadows from the frame they are holding. I think frames are best left to PP. This way you can size them, etc.

Also looks as if you are in direct sun which is usually a losing battle unless you can underexpose, either with an nd filter, or have more powerful lights.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Jun 28, 2011 09:11 |  #3

Group shots always present lighting challenges. Throw a picture frame between your flash and your subjects and it becomes a nightmare.

Group shots are a time to keep the lighting simple. One light above the camera works best. Make that a big umbrella if you can, or hotshoe flash if you must.

When you minimize the technical challenges, you can concentrate on the important stuff that Mom will actually notice, like getting a smile out of young teenagers who are just too cool to have their picture taken.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,761 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16865
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jun 28, 2011 09:18 |  #4

Exposure looks good and it is not that difficult this situation. Use your histogram for the whites shirts and the rest falls into place.

I noticed the frame is not parallel to your camera. Right side is closer by quite a bit so depending on the flash positions may have caused the shadow on the right. Also it looks like the flash on the right was more powerful but you may be trying to get some interesting light.

Next time find a tree branch and hang the fame from it with fishing line. Position your camera so it is parallel to it and then bring the people in. Easier than trying to control people. Don't have the flashes so far apart. Not sure if they were bare or you used and umbrella or something.

You may consider one flash with or without an umbrella/softbox centred up high and aiming down. You can try putting a reflector parallel to the ground between the flash and the people.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Jun 28, 2011 10:15 |  #5

Thanks, guys! Let me try to address some of the remarks:

No, we were in shade, not sunlight. I do think I had the flashes too far apart, not close enough to me/camera.

By "one light above camera" do you mean an OCF positioned pretty much even with me/camera and up? I was worried about the flashes being too high and casting shadows under eyes, but I probably over-compensated by having them too low.

Good catch on the frame not ebing parallel to the camera. I'll have to watch that next time. I don't think the flashes had different settings, I think I checked to make sure they were evenly set. I was using shoot through umbrellas.


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14912
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 28, 2011 10:21 |  #6

Michelle, what lights are you using? For groups like this where you arent really looking for creative side shadowing your best bet is one big light source reasonably close to the camera axis, or at most two soft lights close in pointing straight at the group. If you have a portable studio strobe of any sort take a look at the PLM's by the alien bee folks, you can fire them with speedlights as well, but I havent tested them for efficiency.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
digital ­ paradise
Awaiting the title ferry...
Avatar
19,761 posts
Gallery: 157 photos
Likes: 16865
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Canada
     
Jun 28, 2011 10:40 |  #7

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #12670821 (external link)
By "one light above camera" do you mean an OCF positioned pretty much even with me/camera and up? I was worried about the flashes being too high and casting shadows under eyes, but I probably over-compensated by having them too low.

That is what the reflector is for.


Image Editing OK

Website (external link) ~ Buy/Sell Feedback

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Loft ­ Studios
Goldmember
1,072 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
     
Jun 28, 2011 10:53 |  #8

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #12670406 (external link)
Not long ago I had a family session that was a first for me 3 times over: first family group of such a large size, first family session of African American ( or black American, or People of Color,whichever you feel most PC :) ), first time using OCF for family session.

This image I am posting is SOOC and representative of the problem I saw in many of my shots-- the shadow on faces. I had two flashes, camera left & right. Did I have them too far to the sides and not enough to the front? Any other suggestions to improve very welcome!

This is the problem that most (if not all amateurs) have problems with..... dual lighting. Common sense says to place one light to the left and one light to the right. Well, this is what you get when that happens, especially when you do not use modifiers that "soften" the light..... You get "Cross Shadowing". If you are going to use dual lighting and choose to use the "copy lighting" technique (this is a lighting technique that was used to do copy work as well as photographing paintings and other works of art to transfer them over to the photographic medium back in the ole' days) then make sure that you use medium to large size modifiers on the lights so as to "soften" the cross shadowing to whereby you really don't see it.


MARK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Jun 28, 2011 11:35 |  #9

Michelle Brooks Photography wrote in post #12670821 (external link)
By "one light above camera" do you mean an OCF positioned pretty much even with me/camera and up?

Yes. An umbrella or softbox right behind you (or right beside you), just above your head. This won't cause dark eye sockets but it could be problematic with the way that frame was positioned. If the frame was a bit higher it would work fine.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
23,883 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Huntington Station, NY
     
Jun 28, 2011 11:45 as a reply to  @ Curtis N's post |  #10

Another vote for a larger, diffused light source just above camera position. 99% of the time it's the best way to go.


Robert
RobertMitchellPhotogra​phy (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Jun 28, 2011 12:19 |  #11

The Loft Studios wrote in post #12671037 (external link)
This is the problem that most (if not all amateurs) have problems with..... dual lighting. Common sense says to place one light to the left and one light to the right. Well, this is what you get when that happens, especially when you do not use modifiers that "soften" the light..... You get "Cross Shadowing". If you are going to use dual lighting and choose to use the "copy lighting" technique (this is a lighting technique that was used to do copy work as well as photographing paintings and other works of art to transfer them over to the photographic medium back in the ole' days) then make sure that you use medium to large size modifiers on the lights so as to "soften" the cross shadowing to whereby you really don't see it.

Are the shoot through umbrellas I used not considered medium to large modifers? thanks for the info!


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Jun 28, 2011 12:20 |  #12

Oh, and I was using my 2 580EXIIs.


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Michelle ­ Brooks ­ Photography
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,192 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2009
Location: SC
     
Jun 28, 2011 12:21 |  #13

TMR Design wrote in post #12671333 (external link)
Another vote for a larger, diffused light source just above camera position. 99% of the time it's the best way to go.

Thank you!


Michelle Brooks Photography (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
umphotography
grabbing their Johnson
Avatar
12,321 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 4203
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idaho
     
Jun 28, 2011 12:52 |  #14

TMR Design wrote in post #12671333 (external link)
Another vote for a larger, diffused light source just above camera position. 99% of the time it's the best way to go.

x3

i like the KISS ( Keep it simple stupid) meathod. 64" paraboic would work awesome on her example. BTW stupid was no way directed at michelle. We like what michelle and her husband do. My wife and i are a husband wife team as well.


Mike
www.umphotography.com (external link)
GEAR LIST
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Seamus69
Senior Member
788 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 48
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Pensacola
     
Jun 28, 2011 12:57 |  #15

Wow. Thanks for the question and the answers. I learned a lot of useful stuff here.


Canon 60D, 5Diii, 24-105, 24-70ii, 70-200 f2.8 ii is, 580ex, (2)430ex

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,817 views & 0 likes for this thread, 11 members have posted to it.
Where did I goof?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur
972 guests, 175 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.