On a FF camera and EF Lens, what is the widest recommended length that does not distort (in an obvious way) the scene?
How about on an APS-C with an EF-S lens?
What lens is recommended to get wide and straight?
HiggsBoson Goldmember 1,958 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Texas Hill Country More info | Jun 28, 2011 11:13 | #1 On a FF camera and EF Lens, what is the widest recommended length that does not distort (in an obvious way) the scene? A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bishop13 Senior Member 559 posts Likes: 7 Joined Aug 2006 Location: San Diego, CA More info | Jun 28, 2011 11:18 | #2 My Sigma 10-20 distorts noticeably at it's widest on my XTi & 40D, but goes away around 14-15mm.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thestone11 Goldmember 1,203 posts Joined May 2011 Location: Edmonton, Alberta More info | Jun 28, 2011 11:18 | #3 It varies between lens for this matter! Some of them has better control on distortion! Bare in mind, almost all the ultra wide angle lens will carry distortion! You can always crop it out too! There are tons of review online to show u sample pics and details spec on specific lens, great way to compare! Canon 5D MK II | Fuji X100 | Canon T2i | Canon 100mm macro f/2.8 | Canon 135L f/2 | Canon 50mm f/1.2 L | 17-40mm f/4 L | 24-70mm f/2.8 L | 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM |Canon 430EX II Flash X2 | Pocketwizard TT5 & TT1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jun 28, 2011 11:19 | #4 A wide fixed focal length lens or software which has the ability to fix distortion. _
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pulsar123 Goldmember More info | Jun 28, 2011 11:22 | #5 The only FL which doesn't "distort" the photo (or, in other words, when what you see looking at the photo is comparable to what you saw with your eyes) is the so-called "standard" FL: 50mm on FF, or 31mm on a 1.6x crop. For much longer FL, the background looks "compressed"; for much shorter FL, the background is "stretched", and the objects near photo edges look stretched. As long as you are staying close to the standard FL (say, 35-70mm on FF), none of the above should be very obvious. 6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Jun 28, 2011 11:28 | #6 What are your concerns about distortion? What sorts of distortion? As mentioned above any focal length lens will induce some sort of perspective shift to a scene, is the nature of lenses. If you just mean fisheye and or barrel or pincushion distortion thats different than the sorts of perspective distortion you get in a portrait or still life of an object with known lines.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop 20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Jun 28, 2011 13:47 | #7 Higgs Boson wrote in post #12671157 On a FF camera and EF Lens, what is the widest recommended length that does not distort (in an obvious way) the scene? How about on an APS-C with an EF-S lens? What lens is recommended to get wide and straight? The real fact that you must understand if you're going to make well-composed photographs is that the perspective that folks have been referring to has NOTHING to do with focal lengths per se. Perspective is controlled purely by the position of the camera relative to the elements of the scene in front of it. Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
arentol Goldmember 1,305 posts Joined Jun 2009 Location: Seattle WA More info | Jun 28, 2011 13:53 | #8 Are you concerned with lens distortion or perspective distortion, because they are two entirely different things... And the first is usually easily fixed in post, and the other is based entirely on your decisions and only indirectly has to do with the lens and its focal length. 5D3 | Rokinon 14 f/2.8 | 16-35L II | TS-E 24L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Voigtlander 40 f/2.0 | Σ 50 f/1.4 | MP-E 65 | 70-200 2.8L IS II | Σ 85 f/1.4 | Zeiss 100 f/2 | Σ 120-300 f/2.8 OS | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Fuji X10 | OM-D E-M5 | http://www.mikehjphoto.com/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HiggsBoson THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,958 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Texas Hill Country More info | Jun 28, 2011 14:01 | #9 Perspective distortion. I have CS5 and LR3. I took a photo of a guy standing in front of his business with a wide lens and his left arm is twice the size of his right arm. I could not correct this in post. I am trying to figure out how wide I can go and avoid this type of problem. Yes, he was standing a lot closer than the rest of the subject matter but that's how I want it. A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Jun 28, 2011 14:03 | #10 Higgs Boson wrote in post #12672138 Perspective distortion. I have CS5 and LR3. I took a photo of a guy standing in front of his business with a wide lens and his left arm is twice the size of his right arm. I could not correct this in post. I am trying to figure out how wide I can go and avoid this type of problem. Yes, he was standing a lot closer than the rest of the subject matter but that's how I want it. Read Skip's link.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HiggsBoson THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,958 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Texas Hill Country More info | Jun 28, 2011 14:05 | #11 pulsar123 wrote in post #12671214 The only FL which doesn't "distort" the photo (or, in other words, when what you see looking at the photo is comparable to what you saw with your eyes) is the so-called "standard" FL: 50mm on FF, or 31mm on a 1.6x crop. For much longer FL, the background looks "compressed"; for much shorter FL, the background is "stretched", and the objects near photo edges look stretched. As long as you are staying close to the standard FL (say, 35-70mm on FF), none of the above should be very obvious. Ah, this is what I'm after..... A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135
LOG IN TO REPLY |
banpreso Goldmember 2,176 posts Likes: 4 Joined Feb 2009 Location: Socal More info | Jun 28, 2011 14:08 | #12 both crop and ff have the same perspective (or perspective distortion) given the same focal length. crop sensor just gives a cropped image of a full frame sensor, it does nothing to change the perspective. 50mm on full frame and 30mm on crop gives the same angle of view (field of view), but different perspective.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Jun 28, 2011 14:12 | #13 Higgs Boson wrote in post #12672162 Ah, this is what I'm after..... And I will read the link, for sure. The link will tell you why that is not necessarily true. It may be functionally accurate, but it might not be as well.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
HiggsBoson THREAD STARTER Goldmember 1,958 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Texas Hill Country More info | Jun 28, 2011 14:19 | #14 The arms were equidistant from the camera. One was closer to the side of the frame though.... A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pulsar123 Goldmember More info | Jun 28, 2011 14:24 | #15 banpreso wrote in post #12672185 50mm on full frame and 30mm on crop gives the same angle of view (field of view), but different perspective. ??? This doesn't make sense. Take two cameras: one FF with 50mm, the other one crop with 30mm, and make one shot with each from the same location, of the same subject. Once you print both on the same size photo paper, will they look different (in terms of perspective and angle of view)? No. 6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 767 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||