Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 28 Jun 2011 (Tuesday) 11:13
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How Wide Without Distortion?

 
Higgs ­ Boson
Goldmember
1,958 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Jun 28, 2011 11:13 |  #1

On a FF camera and EF Lens, what is the widest recommended length that does not distort (in an obvious way) the scene?

How about on an APS-C with an EF-S lens?

What lens is recommended to get wide and straight?


A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bishop13
Senior Member
Avatar
559 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Aug 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
     
Jun 28, 2011 11:18 |  #2

My Sigma 10-20 distorts noticeably at it's widest on my XTi & 40D, but goes away around 14-15mm.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thestone11
Goldmember
Avatar
1,203 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
     
Jun 28, 2011 11:18 |  #3

It varies between lens for this matter! Some of them has better control on distortion! Bare in mind, almost all the ultra wide angle lens will carry distortion! You can always crop it out too! There are tons of review online to show u sample pics and details spec on specific lens, great way to compare!


Canon 5D MK II | Fuji X100 | Canon T2i | Canon 100mm macro f/2.8 | Canon 135L f/2 | Canon 50mm f/1.2 L | 17-40mm f/4 L | 24-70mm f/2.8 L | 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM |Canon 430EX II Flash X2 | Pocketwizard TT5 & TT1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
davidc502
Goldmember
Avatar
3,459 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 38
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Tennessee
     
Jun 28, 2011 11:19 |  #4

A wide fixed focal length lens or software which has the ability to fix distortion.

Cheers,

David


_
My Gear is ---> Here

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pulsar123
Goldmember
2,235 posts
Gallery: 82 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 871
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Canada
     
Jun 28, 2011 11:22 |  #5

The only FL which doesn't "distort" the photo (or, in other words, when what you see looking at the photo is comparable to what you saw with your eyes) is the so-called "standard" FL: 50mm on FF, or 31mm on a 1.6x crop. For much longer FL, the background looks "compressed"; for much shorter FL, the background is "stretched", and the objects near photo edges look stretched. As long as you are staying close to the standard FL (say, 35-70mm on FF), none of the above should be very obvious.


6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 28, 2011 11:28 |  #6

What are your concerns about distortion? What sorts of distortion? As mentioned above any focal length lens will induce some sort of perspective shift to a scene, is the nature of lenses. If you just mean fisheye and or barrel or pincushion distortion thats different than the sorts of perspective distortion you get in a portrait or still life of an object with known lines.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jun 28, 2011 13:47 |  #7

Higgs Boson wrote in post #12671157 (external link)
On a FF camera and EF Lens, what is the widest recommended length that does not distort (in an obvious way) the scene?

How about on an APS-C with an EF-S lens?

What lens is recommended to get wide and straight?

The real fact that you must understand if you're going to make well-composed photographs is that the perspective that folks have been referring to has NOTHING to do with focal lengths per se. Perspective is controlled purely by the position of the camera relative to the elements of the scene in front of it.

While it's true that many old-time photographers (including me a couple of decades ago) believe that the chosen focal length controls perspective, that's a very old myth. Several of us here decided to prove the truth and write an article that's been viewed almost 58,000 times so far and received lots of kudos.

For more information on perspective and how to control it, please read our "sticky" (now found in the General Photography Talk forum) tutorial titled Perspective Control in Images - Focal Length or Distance?.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
arentol
Goldmember
1,305 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Seattle WA
     
Jun 28, 2011 13:53 |  #8

Are you concerned with lens distortion or perspective distortion, because they are two entirely different things... And the first is usually easily fixed in post, and the other is based entirely on your decisions and only indirectly has to do with the lens and its focal length.


5D3 | Rokinon 14 f/2.8 | 16-35L II | TS-E 24L | Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 | Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 | Voigtlander 40 f/2.0 | Σ 50 f/1.4 | MP-E 65 | 70-200 2.8L IS II | Σ 85 f/1.4 | Zeiss 100 f/2 | Σ 120-300 f/2.8 OS | 580 EX II | 430 EX II | Fuji X10 | OM-D E-M5 | http://www.mikehjphoto​.com/ (external link)
*****Lenses For Sale (external link)*****

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,958 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Jun 28, 2011 14:01 |  #9

Perspective distortion. I have CS5 and LR3. I took a photo of a guy standing in front of his business with a wide lens and his left arm is twice the size of his right arm. I could not correct this in post. I am trying to figure out how wide I can go and avoid this type of problem. Yes, he was standing a lot closer than the rest of the subject matter but that's how I want it.


A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 28, 2011 14:03 |  #10

Higgs Boson wrote in post #12672138 (external link)
Perspective distortion. I have CS5 and LR3. I took a photo of a guy standing in front of his business with a wide lens and his left arm is twice the size of his right arm. I could not correct this in post. I am trying to figure out how wide I can go and avoid this type of problem. Yes, he was standing a lot closer than the rest of the subject matter but that's how I want it.

Read Skip's link.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,958 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Jun 28, 2011 14:05 |  #11

pulsar123 wrote in post #12671214 (external link)
The only FL which doesn't "distort" the photo (or, in other words, when what you see looking at the photo is comparable to what you saw with your eyes) is the so-called "standard" FL: 50mm on FF, or 31mm on a 1.6x crop. For much longer FL, the background looks "compressed"; for much shorter FL, the background is "stretched", and the objects near photo edges look stretched. As long as you are staying close to the standard FL (say, 35-70mm on FF), none of the above should be very obvious.

Ah, this is what I'm after.....

And I will read the link, for sure.


A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
banpreso
Goldmember
2,176 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Socal
     
Jun 28, 2011 14:08 |  #12

both crop and ff have the same perspective (or perspective distortion) given the same focal length. crop sensor just gives a cropped image of a full frame sensor, it does nothing to change the perspective. 50mm on full frame and 30mm on crop gives the same angle of view (field of view), but different perspective.

to make the perspective distortion not so obvious i wouldn't go wider than 35mm, but you might want to stick with 50mm to be safe. the deal with left arm longer than right arm is because the left arm is closer to the camera. if your subject is standing flat to the camera you won't have this problem, even with a 14mm.


Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jun 28, 2011 14:12 |  #13

Higgs Boson wrote in post #12672162 (external link)
Ah, this is what I'm after.....

And I will read the link, for sure.

The link will tell you why that is not necessarily true. It may be functionally accurate, but it might not be as well.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,958 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Jun 28, 2011 14:19 |  #14

The arms were equidistant from the camera. One was closer to the side of the frame though....

So the question becomes then not what FL, but HOW do most of you successfully acheive a wide environmental portrait? I want the owner to be close enough to the camera to be recognizable but still show his business (which is consumes a fairly wide space).....I'd like to get his whole body, not just a headshot....

I'm going to assume I should move myself (camera) and the subject both farther from the background subject and use a longer lens to contain the background rather than a short lens to try and capture it from a closer distance. Fortunately, we have more room to move....


A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pulsar123
Goldmember
2,235 posts
Gallery: 82 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 871
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Canada
     
Jun 28, 2011 14:24 |  #15

banpreso wrote in post #12672185 (external link)
50mm on full frame and 30mm on crop gives the same angle of view (field of view), but different perspective.

??? This doesn't make sense. Take two cameras: one FF with 50mm, the other one crop with 30mm, and make one shot with each from the same location, of the same subject. Once you print both on the same size photo paper, will they look different (in terms of perspective and angle of view)? No.


6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,684 views & 0 likes for this thread, 24 members have posted to it and it is followed by 3 members.
How Wide Without Distortion?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
767 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.