Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 29 Jun 2011 (Wednesday) 06:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Focus area, DOF?

 
aussiedee
Member
Avatar
143 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Queensland, Australia
     
Jun 29, 2011 06:30 |  #1

Not sure where to post this. So feel free to move it to the right area.

I just bought an external flash.. the 430EX II. Was told it was a mid-range flash.

Hooked it up and decided to try it out in the bedroom with the pets. They always make good subjects.

Ok... I took some shots of our chihuahua. She's good practice because she's always moving but tonight she just layed on the bed and let me take pictures.

When I brought the photo into lightroom I noticed that the tip of her nose is as clear as but her eyes are not.... This is a close up shot too... I just zoomed in. In order to for her entire head to be in focus, what should I have done to get a full frame focus?

Posting the image and the exif....

Exposure 1/200 at f/5.6
Focal length 200mm
ISO 100
Flash: Fired

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

My Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rdompor
Senior Member
Avatar
671 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
     
Jun 29, 2011 06:38 |  #2

Depth of field is a function of focusing distance, focal length, and aperture size. At closer distances, longer lengths and larger apertures the dof becomes thinner. At longer distances, shorter lengths and smaller apertures the dof becomes larger. To compensate for your longer focal length here you could have either backed up or stopped down your lens. I imagine that you couldn't back up enough to compensate since the dof is extremely thin here. Stopping down the lens might also not be enough and usually makes proper exposure more difficult to acheive - something that could be remedied by your flash.

My suggestion would be to shoot with a combination of short focal length and smaller apertures. Although you would have to move closer to the subject to achieve your close up, it would be easier to get your photo in focus.


Ramon
ULTRAMONTAGNE (external link)
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aussiedee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
143 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Queensland, Australia
     
Jun 29, 2011 06:44 |  #3

Can you explain "stopping down the lens"? I haven't heard that expression yet.

Scratch that... looked it up... just never heard it said like that before.....

Ok... Still need to get my head around the bigger/wider/smaller/ thing with aperture.
I've read up on it so many times and I still get buggered by it.

Bigger the fstop number then more of the image is in focus? (Bigger the number, smaller the hole) correct?

So if I shot my dog f/5.6.... and she's not all clear, I should have upped the f-stop to like 8?


My Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBigDog
Goldmember
2,068 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 681
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sicklerville, NJ, USA
     
Jun 29, 2011 06:48 |  #4

Which AF mode were you using?
It just looks like missed focus to me, there is more to contrast around the nose since the fur is white, so the camera probably picked that up and said ok I'll focus on this.

Stopping down means increasing the aperture number (but it's really inverse because the higher the aperture number the smaller the aperture itself). So while this shot was taken at 5.6, stopping it down would be taking it to f/8 - and the result of this would be the increased depth of field, so in this example the nose and more of the snout would be in focus.

Hope this helps


Christian
http://www.cegphotogra​phy.com/ (external link)
Member, Full Disc Aviation (external link)
Flickr (external link) * Facebook (external link)
Instagram (external link)Aviation Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBigDog
Goldmember
2,068 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 681
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sicklerville, NJ, USA
     
Jun 29, 2011 06:51 |  #5

Also, check out this website here:

Depth of Field Calculator (external link)

This will ultimately answer your question on how to get the whole head in focus


Christian
http://www.cegphotogra​phy.com/ (external link)
Member, Full Disc Aviation (external link)
Flickr (external link) * Facebook (external link)
Instagram (external link)Aviation Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
3,515 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Australia
     
Jun 29, 2011 06:54 |  #6

aussiedee wrote in post #12676045 (external link)
Bigger the fstop number then more of the image is in focus? (Bigger the number, smaller the hole) correct?

Correct. Bigger number = smaller hole = more in focus but less light gets in.

With a flash you probably could have stopped down more to get more in focus. But regardless make sure you focus on the eyes still. Keep in mind that the DoF we see in our images is a range, so if you focus on th eyes then a bit behind and a bit in front will be in focus, whereas if you focus on the nose then the bit in front is effectively wasted.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aussiedee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
143 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Queensland, Australia
     
Jun 29, 2011 06:55 |  #7

TheBigDog wrote in post #12676051 (external link)
Which AF mode were you using?...... So while this shot was taken at 5.6, stopping it down would be taking it to f/8 - .......

Hope this helps

Ha ha.... cool! So I pretty much answered my own question, ... I edited my post and then yours appeared below it.

I was trying a couple different ones.... M mode and AV... I usually use Av


My Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TheBigDog
Goldmember
2,068 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Likes: 681
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sicklerville, NJ, USA
     
Jun 29, 2011 06:57 |  #8

aussiedee wrote in post #12676064 (external link)
I was trying a couple different ones.... M mode and AV... I usually use Av

That's the drive mode, the autofocus mode would be center point, expansion, etc. I guess the simplest way to ask is do you choose the autofocus point or do you let the camera choose it for you?


Christian
http://www.cegphotogra​phy.com/ (external link)
Member, Full Disc Aviation (external link)
Flickr (external link) * Facebook (external link)
Instagram (external link)Aviation Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aussiedee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
143 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Queensland, Australia
     
Jun 29, 2011 07:01 |  #9

Correct. Bigger number = smaller hole = more in focus but less light gets in.

Which is where the shutter speed comes in (longer shutter, more light)... right? or use of a flash.

@TheBigDog Thanks for the website... bookmarked!
Also trying to score a book someone recommended but hard to find in Oz.


My Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aussiedee
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Avatar
143 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Queensland, Australia
     
Jun 29, 2011 07:05 |  #10

TheBigDog wrote in post #12676074 (external link)
That's the drive mode, the autofocus mode would be center point, expansion, etc. I guess the simplest way to ask is do you choose the autofocus point or do you let the camera choose it for you?

I have it on auto-focus one shot.


My Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phreeky
Goldmember
3,515 posts
Likes: 15
Joined Oct 2007
Location: Australia
     
Jun 29, 2011 07:30 |  #11

aussiedee wrote in post #12676082 (external link)
Which is where the shutter speed comes in (longer shutter, more light)... right? or use of a flash.

The exposure of your image is basically determined by three factors (ignoring additional light) which is what makes things a little tricky. Aperture, shutter speed, and ISO (sensitivity). Change one and you have to alter at least one other to correct for it and maintain your exposure. ISO is the one that has little control over the "look" of your photo, but increase it too much and you get noise.

You used ISO100 in your photo. You could've pushed the ISO to 400 without much negative impact and therefore set your aperture to F/11. Though believe it or not there is even a negative to the aperture being too small (diffraction, yay for optical limitations), but in reality F/11 would be fine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LeeRatters
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,903 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9567
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Bristol, UK
     
Jun 29, 2011 07:46 |  #12

i think this is more a case of missed focus than anything else.
selecting the focus point yourself is the way to go!!


>> Flickr << (external link)


>> Instagram<< (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Uopi
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Feb 2008
     
Jun 29, 2011 07:51 as a reply to  @ phreeky's post |  #13

Some top tips to help you:

Focus on the eye, normally the one nearest to you if not head on

This may help with you DOF as the eye is the critical, must be in focus, if the nose is slightly out you can still keep hopefully use the shot.

Use the central focus point

If the pet is moving fast then servo auto focus (but you then can't focus and reframe the shot, so just zoom out/step back to get what you need in the fram - refocus)

Exposure on evaluative and check the whites are not washed out (smallest of gap on the right of the histogram).


EOS 5D Mk II, EOS 50D, EOS 1 film, all with grips. EFS 10-20, EF 16-35 F2.8L MkII, Zeiss Distagon T* 2,8/21, EF 24-105[COLOR=red] [COLOR=black]F4L IS, EF 28-80 F3.5-4L, EF 50 F1.8 MkI, [COLOR=red]EF 70-200 F2.8L [COLOR=black]IS, EF 100 F2.8 Macro, EF MP-E 65, EF 40 STM, EF 85 F1.2L MkII, Diana+ 20 fisheye plastic fantastic, Hartblie 35 F2.8 Super-Rotator, Rokkor 58 F1.2 + Leitax mount, Kenko 1.4x PRO 300, Kenko Auto Extension tubes DG, Skink Pinhole Lens Pro. MR-14EX, 580EX. Storage by SanDisk

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_311
Checking squirrels nuts
3,761 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 570
Joined Mar 2011
     
Jun 29, 2011 08:37 |  #14

phreeky wrote in post #12676063 (external link)
Correct. Bigger number = smaller hole = more in focus but less light gets in.

to clarify the bigger number is actually smaller. they are fractions.

f2 is actually 1/2 and f8 is actually 1/8 so f8 actually is smaller than f2. yes its confusing, but if you think it about like the fractions that they truly are it makes more sense.


Canon 5d mkii | Canon 17-40/4L | Tamron 24-70/2.8 | Canon 85/1.8 | Canon 135/2L
www.michaelalestraphot​ography.com (external link)
Flickr (external link) | 500px (external link) | About me

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rdompor
Senior Member
Avatar
671 posts
Joined Nov 2008
Location: New Jersey
     
Jun 29, 2011 11:01 |  #15

mike_311 wrote in post #12676401 (external link)
to clarify the bigger number is actually smaller. they are fractions.

f2 is actually 1/2 and f8 is actually 1/8 so f8 actually is smaller than f2. yes its confusing, but if you think it about like the fractions that they truly are it makes more sense.

I always tell others to think of it as it is: it's not f2, but f/2. not f8 but f/8 (focal length/value). This usually clears things up.


Ramon
ULTRAMONTAGNE (external link)
Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,549 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
Focus area, DOF?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is NekoZ8
1046 guests, 107 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.