Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 01 Jul 2011 (Friday) 16:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Camera Raw White Balance help please

 
Gil ­ Bean
Senior Member
515 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: San Angelo, TX
     
Jul 01, 2011 16:39 |  #1

In the book The Photoshop Elements 9 Book for Digital Photographers (Voices That Matter) byScott Kelby (external link) & Matt Kloskowski (external link) there is a card about 8 X 10 separated into 4 sections. 1 is a very light gray with "CAMERA RAW WHITE BALANCE", 1 is a darker gray with "MEDIUM" (darker than 18%), 1 looks black to me with "SHADOW", 1 looks white to me with "HIGHLIGHT". It is perforated to be removed from the book. It has a "glossy" finish. I have not read all the book but have searched for the card's use. I have yet to find its purpose. Does anyone have any idea of its purpose?

GilBean


G3, G6, G12, T2i + kit lens & accoutrements

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
S.Horton
worship my useful and insightful comments
Avatar
18,051 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 120
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Royersford, PA
     
Jul 01, 2011 16:53 |  #2

....keep reading. You take a picture of the card so that you can set your white balance perfectly, plus your contrast.


Sam - TF Says Ishmael
http://midnightblue.sm​ugmug.com (external link) 
Want your title changed?Dream On! (external link)

:cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
melanopsin
Senior Member
278 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jul 01, 2011 17:11 |  #3

Yeah, keep reading! :D

A photo of the card section CAMERA WHITE BALANCE is made -- the card is in the same light as the subject. That photo is used by the camera to set white balance on subsequent images. See camera manual how to do that.

The gray sections are used to set exposure values. The HIGHLIGHTS section is also used to set exposure values so subject highlights are not blown.

Images with the card included can be used in PP to easy set WB, black, white and gray points in Curves.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
leeport
Senior Member
Avatar
816 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2008
     
Jul 01, 2011 17:13 |  #4

Watch this..http://youtu.be/n19pJo​Hxy-Y (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jul 02, 2011 09:36 |  #5

S.Horton wrote in post #12690269 (external link)
....set your white balance perfectly...

And sometimes that's important. But don't be afraid to adjust the final result by eye which just makes more sense to me. If it looks good, I don't care if it's 'perfect' or not.


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
leeport
Senior Member
Avatar
816 posts
Likes: 3
Joined May 2008
     
Jul 03, 2011 10:00 |  #6

PhotosGuy wrote in post #12693011 (external link)
And sometimes that's important. But don't be afraid to adjust the final result by eye which just makes more sense to me. If it looks good, I don't care if it's 'perfect' or not.

This is great advice. I usually set AWB in camera and then adjust accordingly in CS5. I like the idea of the video and having the model first shoot with the gray/white card and then using that to determine WB in post. But I always use my eye in the end.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Jul 03, 2011 10:33 |  #7

Its junk and probably not worth the card stock its printed on. Its unlikely to be spectrally neutral and the glossy finish is a negative. A good White Balance card will at least have at least a matte finish to minimize glare.

Gil Bean wrote in post #12690212 (external link)
In the book The Photoshop Elements 9 Book for Digital Photographers (Voices That Matter) byScott Kelby (external link) & Matt Kloskowski (external link) there is a card about 8 X 10 separated into 4 sections. 1 is a very light gray with "CAMERA RAW WHITE BALANCE", 1 is a darker gray with "MEDIUM" (darker than 18%), 1 looks black to me with "SHADOW", 1 looks white to me with "HIGHLIGHT". It is perforated to be removed from the book. It has a "glossy" finish. I have not read all the book but have searched for the card's use. I have yet to find its purpose. Does anyone have any idea of its purpose?

GilBean


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gil ­ Bean
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
515 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: San Angelo, TX
     
Jul 03, 2011 23:04 as a reply to  @ PixelMagic's post |  #8

Thank each of you for your replies and time. I guess I simply have not found that part yet. I assumed it was to be used like a gray card but could not find when/where/how to use it. Read on Bean!!!:) I sincerely appreciate your time.
I use a gray card for WB. Did y'all know the G12 shoots a gray card at 14% so you have to add a +half exposure to get the correct WB? That may be in this book.
I thought it had a color checker card too but I cannot find it. Soooo, is there a relatively inexpensive Colorchecker card. I do not want to spend 80 to 100 USD for one.
Again, Thank you for your help.
Gil


G3, G6, G12, T2i + kit lens & accoutrements

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
melanopsin
Senior Member
278 posts
Joined Aug 2010
     
Jul 03, 2011 23:29 as a reply to  @ Gil Bean's post |  #9

Gray card for white balance is fine, gray is a 'shade' of white, gray is a white-balanced color.

The thing about the real color checker card is the ink pigments are specially formulated to reflect color light that is not spectral, i.e. made from other colors like the colors seen on your monitor. Monitor colors are made by combining red, green, and blue colors, whereas the pigment on the card reflect a specific color. Okay my explanation isn't very good imho, the color checker web site explains better than me. :o




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Jul 03, 2011 23:40 |  #10

Gil Bean wrote in post #12700362 (external link)
Thank each of you for your replies and time. I guess I simply have not found that part yet. I assumed it was to be used like a gray card but could not find when/where/how to use it. Read on Bean!!!:) I sincerely appreciate your time.
I use a gray card for WB. Did y'all know the G12 shoots a gray card at 14% so you have to add a +half exposure to get the correct WB? That may be in this book.
I thought it had a color checker card too but I cannot find it. Soooo, is there a relatively inexpensive Colorchecker card. I do not want to spend 80 to 100 USD for one.
Again, Thank you for your help.
Gil

Actually you are mixing up a White Balance target and an Exposure target. A White Balance target only needs to be "color-neutral" -- whether it is "medium gray" or not doesn't matter as long as it is balanced/neutral between R, G and B. Even then, there is, as has been mentioned above, a matter of personal taste -- you can click a nice neutral white piece of paper without a hint of color and then decide that you prefer something a bit different.

Gray cards are a different category. Many years ago Ansel Adams decided that "18% Gray" was a proper tone falling in the middle of his 7-zone system and he convinced Kodak to adopt it as a "standard" for metering.

The problem is that there are some inconsitencies in that approach, both in the cards produced, in the meters used, and in how digital sensors deal with Raw data. And, as you've seen, the result is that a "good" exposure of an 18% gray card will come out with the spike somewhat above the "medium" that the "standard" suggests.

In fact, in the digital realm, 18% gray is not in the "middle" of digital tones at all, but this can get rather, well, complicated...

But, yes, it is typical for one to set, say, a +1/3 stop Ev when you use a gray card. But, there are various ways to set a good exposure without getting real complicated!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Rimmer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,416 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Nov 2010
     
Jul 05, 2011 09:28 |  #11

Gil Bean wrote in post #12690212 (external link)
In the book [SIZE=2][I]The Photoshop Elements 9 Book for Digital Photographers (Voices That Matter).... I have not read all the book but have searched for the card's use. I have yet to find its purpose. Does anyone have any idea of its purpose?

GilBean

I have the Kindle edition of the book so can't refer you to a specific page number for the print version, but go to Chapter 4 and search for a heading entitled "Studio Photo Correction Made Simple." You will find text as well as several pictures showing the card in use. You will also find a brief mention in Chapter 2 under the heading "TIP: Using a Swatch Card."

Oh, but wait -- I was looking to see if there were any more references in the book and just found the answer: go to the index and look for "Color Swatch Card." There you will see that the above two references are found on pages 63 and 158-159.


Ace Rimmer -- "What a guy!"
"Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast." ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gil ­ Bean
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
515 posts
Joined Jan 2009
Location: San Angelo, TX
     
Jul 08, 2011 22:14 |  #12

PhotosGuy wrote in post #12693011 (external link)
And sometimes that's important. But don't be afraid to adjust the final result by eye which just makes more sense to me. If it looks good, I don't care if it's 'perfect' or not.

Agree 100%. The gray card may say WB is perfect, the monitor may agree, but is what I see on the printed photograph pleasing to the eye. Of course, what is pleasant to my eye may turn yours away. Monet, Renoir, (impressionistic artists) or the abstract artists (Picasso, Rembrandt) leave me cold.

leeport wrote in post #12697334 (external link)
This is great advice. I usually set AWB in camera and then adjust accordingly in CS5. I like the idea of the video and having the model first shoot with the gray/white card and then using that to determine WB in post. But I always use my eye in the end.

I am not "into" PP enough to justify CS5 but use DPP & PSE9 to adjust WB, usually trying several different WBes before finding one I like.

PixelMagic wrote in post #12697467 (external link)
Its junk and probably not worth the card stock its printed on. Its unlikely to be spectrally neutral and the glossy finish is a negative. A good White Balance card will at least have at least a matte finish to minimize glare.

Perhaps, but it gives me a starting point on my non-calibrated monitor. Also, on something I think important,
I cheat, post photos, & ask y'all.:):o

melanopsin wrote in post #12700458 (external link)
Gray card for white balance is fine, gray is a 'shade' of white, gray is a white-balanced color.

The thing about the real color checker card is the ink pigments are specially formulated to reflect color light that is not spectral, i.e. made from other colors like the colors seen on your monitor. Monitor colors are made by combining red, green, and blue colors, whereas the pigment on the card reflect a specific color. Okay my explanation isn't very good imho, the color checker web site explains better than me. :o

Maybe not so good to you, but it helps me understand better the purpose & use of the CCCard. Do not be so quick to denigrate yourself. Is there a decent Color Checker Card that does not cost a $100.00

tonylong wrote in post #12700506 (external link)
Actually you are mixing up a White Balance target and an Exposure target. A White Balance target only needs to be "color-neutral" -- whether it is "medium gray" or not doesn't matter as long as it is balanced/neutral between R, G and B. Even then, there is, as has been mentioned above, a matter of personal taste -- you can click a nice neutral white piece of paper without a hint of color and then decide that you prefer something a bit different.

Gray cards are a different category. Many years ago Ansel Adams decided that "18% Gray" was a proper tone falling in the middle of his 7-zone system and he convinced Kodak to adopt it as a "standard" for metering.

The problem is that there are some inconsitencies in that approach, both in the cards produced, in the meters used, and in how digital sensors deal with Raw data. And, as you've seen, the result is that a "good" exposure of an 18% gray card will come out with the spike somewhat above the "medium" that the "standard" suggests.

In fact, in the digital realm, 18% gray is not in the "middle" of digital tones at all, but this can get rather, well, complicated...

But, yes, it is typical for one to set, say, a +1/3 stop Ev when you use a gray card. But, there are various ways to set a good exposure without getting real complicated!

Mr Adams set numerous standards from what I understand. At least he set, or unfied, standards for that time and many are still relevant. Many give us "starting points" from which we can modify for our purposes, such as the gray card. This is a prime example of "the more I learn, the less I know".:o

Rimmer wrote in post #12707024 (external link)
I have the Kindle edition of the book so can't refer you to a specific page number for the print version, but go to Chapter 4 and search for a heading entitled "Studio Photo Correction Made Simple." You will find text as well as several pictures showing the card in use. You will also find a brief mention in Chapter 2 under the heading "TIP: Using a Swatch Card."

Oh, but wait -- I was looking to see if there were any more references in the book and just found the answer: go to the index and look for "Color Swatch Card." There you will see that the above two references are found on pages 63 and 158-159.

I think I saw those but must not have understood what they said. Perhaps I should re-read those areas and read the book more carefully!

And this brings me back to another part of my question, or a question in another place: Is there a decent Color Checker Card that does not cost a $100.00 (x-rite CC passport)?
Say the Digital Image Flow DGK Color Tools Multifunction Color Chart with White Balance and Exposure Tools

http://www.amazon.com/​Digital-Image-Flow-Multifunction-Exposure/dp/B0036L8TGC​/ref=wl_it_dp_v?ie=UTF​8&coliid=I1W8Q2931JU1O​8&colid=18EO6FN5OZIPO (external link)

Once again, Thank you for your help, advice, suggestions, time & education.

Gil


G3, G6, G12, T2i + kit lens & accoutrements

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,916 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2261
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Jul 08, 2011 22:44 |  #13

WhiBal card.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jul 09, 2011 03:12 |  #14

Is there a decent Color Checker Card that does not cost a $100.00 (x-rite CC passport)?

QP Card 201 + free software, $14.69
QP Card 202 + free software, $55.56
http://www.qpcard.se …31&prod=8&catId​=1&tci=151 (external link)

WhiBal card.

I guess you don't know what a Color Checker is or how it's used. The Whibal is 1/10 of a Color Checker and can't possibly be used to profile a camera. For a cheaper alternative to the Whibal there is QP Card 101, 3 for $18.
http://www.qpcard.se …31&prod=1&catId​=1&tci=100 (external link)


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jul 09, 2011 08:55 |  #15

leeport wrote in post #12697334 (external link)
This is great advice. I usually set AWB in camera and then adjust accordingly in CS5. I like the idea of the video and having the model first shoot with the gray/white card and then using that to determine WB in post. But I always use my eye in the end.

If you do that, why not set a custom WB? Especially if you're shooting inside. Some people swear that AWB is OK outdoors, but I ran a test indoors & have never used it since. Notice that the very last exposure in the 2nd image of tests was of a gray card, & it's way off.
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=54281

And then there's this: Gray Card…White Paper. What’s best?


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,077 views & 0 likes for this thread, 12 members have posted to it.
Camera Raw White Balance help please
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
642 guests, 158 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.