I don't care for the first shot with the selective color, but just my opinion. If the bride likes it, that's what counts.
Second shot in full color is a nice shot.
Third shot looks a bit odd. I could see if she was standing over a grate with wind blowing up like that famous Marilyn Monroe pic, but in this instance I really don't know what to make of it.
Fourth shot of the couple while an okay shot, just shows way too much overhead of basically nothing and would be way more impactful if the couple filled the frame more.
Fifth shot is a nice shot of the rear of a nice car. Would have been better if she was smiling and perhaps looking at the fancy material on the trunk.
As stated, sixth shot is also ok, but I'm not sure what the true color of the dress is as it's quite different from the fifth shot. Perhaps the use of a whi-bal card or passport color checker would cure that anomaly.
Seventh shot is perhaps the best of the lot, but again, a closer crop and less headroom would, IMHO, make it better yet.
I like the last shot, but I have a question. While the bride is beautiful and quite formal, he looks a bit slobbish in a wrinkled white shirt, no jacket, tie. Perhaps that's the tradition. If so, I bow to it. If not, as the photographer perhaps you need to direct that portion a bit better.
And while Suzy chimed in here, she is sometimes too kind. And she knows I love her.
But others chiming in with critique of critique is wholly inappropriate and helps no one. If you like the images, say so. If you don't like them, state that.
Nicksan happens to be an accomplished photographer, having shot probably more than 50 weddings at this point. His critique comes from the heart, can sound a bit harsh at times, but is usually right on the money.
