Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 18 Oct 2005 (Tuesday) 18:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tripod recomendations for XT -Differences in heads ??

 
OverRunWithSons
Member
41 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Oct 18, 2005 18:05 |  #1

I am willing to spend up to $150 on a tripod, I have only used a cheap $20 tripod at a local store (that is now broke-kids did it ) for my last SLR camera, I have never even seen a Ball head tripod, but everyone says this is what to get. It seems when I look for a tripod like this, I have to buy the ball seperately. Why is this ball head better is my first question....can someone explain the pros & cons of the (3) different heads and make recommendations for me (within my price range), I would really appreciate it ! (Would like something lightweight but stable, and easy to use - Quick to set up - so I will accually USE it. I didnt use my last one much.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Oct 18, 2005 18:07 |  #2

What are you using it for? Ballheads are better for wildlife/action, but pan/tilt are better for landscapes/studio.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cfcRebel
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,252 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Austin, TX
     
Oct 18, 2005 18:55 |  #3

I shoot alot of wildlife, so the flexibility of ballhead is really helpful. i can't think of any disadvantages using a ballhead as opposed to a 3-way panhead.


Fee

Canon | SIGMA | TAMRON | Kenko | Amvona

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Oct 18, 2005 20:23 |  #4

The next time you try to frame a flower macro shot using a ballhead you'll take that sentence back.
:-)

I recently got a gear head, the Bogen 410. What a sweet head for landscapes.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OverRunWithSons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
41 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Oct 18, 2005 20:56 |  #5

I just want a tripod more for Family stuff, portraits, etc, no wildlife or action shots, so it sounds like a Pan head is good? What else to look for? What brands to stay away from, to consider? Thanks for the help !




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lostdoggy
King Duffus
Avatar
4,787 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Queens, NY
     
Oct 18, 2005 21:21 |  #6

for around $150 you can probably get a lowend Manfrotto/Bogen or midend Slik or Velbon. These tripod will work well for those family pictures and such as long as you won't be using any heavy lenses. Ball & Pan&Tilt head will do just fine it is just a matter of convience. Usually ballheads has smaller less intrusive knobs then pan&tilt heads which usually have long handles. Ballhead usually locks into position with one or two knobs and P&T have about three handles.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
COKE ­ CAN
goofy name
Avatar
1,069 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Yorktown, VA
     
Oct 18, 2005 21:36 |  #7

DynaTran AT-877W at www.amvona.com (external link) This tripod is great. The price is perfect also. $159 shipped.


Please, call me Steve.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OverRunWithSons
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
41 posts
Joined Oct 2005
     
Oct 19, 2005 06:49 |  #8

Thank you for your help, I think I am sold on the Bogen 3001 with 486RC2 ballhead kit , would you recommend anything else I will need to make this tripod purchase complete? Should I get a bag, straps, do I need extra plates, how long do these ball heads generally last, I heard it said the cheap ballheads are not worth it and wear out fast---is this true??




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Oct 19, 2005 08:04 |  #9

That's an excellent choice, and one you should have for life. You don't *need* anything else. Extra plates are handy in case you like leaving them on a particular lens, if you have a lens which comes with a tripod foot. Otherwise I wouldn't bother. As for a bag or straps they're pretty darn useful if you go hiking - even short distances - with the tripod. I was scrambling down an incline last week and was really wishing I had the tripod in a bag - even though I was only going 100 feet from the car...


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidW
Goldmember
3,165 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
Oct 20, 2005 10:58 |  #10

I've just replaced the conventional 200PL-14 RC2 plates on my 20D's grip and my 70-200's collar with 200PLARCH-14 anti-twist plates (external link). I regard these plates as a huge improvement - I've yet to use them 'in anger', but they should do a much better job of not twisting around when in use.

My setup is relatively heavy - 20D with BG-E2 grip, and either EF 24-70mm f/2.8L (with the camera mounting on the tripod via the grip) or EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS (with the camera mounting on the tripod via the lens collar). In either setup, but especially with the 24-70, I was finding that in some orientations, the camera was twisting round on a standard plate under its own weight.

For the 70-200 collar, I had to follow the instructions to turn the sliding plate around. It's not that difficult, but don't drop either the circlip or the washer that's under the screw!


A Manfrotto 341 RC2 elbow bracket (external link) was delivered today, which I've fixed to the camera and put on the tripod, but haven't yet used for any shots. It's a much better solution to shooting portrait on a tripod, as you're not tilting the head right over. Leaving it on the camera all the time is really a bit cumbersome, but it fits in the top of my tripod bag in a padded plastic bag. The only hassle with the bracket is that the camera screw isn't captive; if, like me, you're only going to put it on the camera occasionally, you need to pay attention to the plastic nut that keeps the screw in the bracket when it's not in use. Nevertheless, it's a much cheaper alternative to the likes of Really Right Stuff L brackets - which, whilst lovely, are an expense I can't justify.

There's a helpful picture of the Manfrotto bracket here (external link). For a Canon camera, you can remove the camera screw with the big grey nut seen hanging down near the bottom of this picture - you need that for some cameras with very offset tripod sockets. If you put the little brass arm you see near the top towards the flat side, and fit the camera facing towards the left of the frame, it works well.

The bracket is in portrait orientation in this picture. Note the plastic 'keeper' nut on the camera screw - that's the bit you mustn't lose. Frustratingly, the big hole behind the camera screw isn't deep enough to push the keeper nut into to keep it safe. I shall simply train myself to put the plastic nut on the QR plate that I remove from the camera. With this flaw acknowledged, it's still a good product, though I wonder whether it would have been better designed to accept an RC2 plate on the camera rather than fixing directly to the camera.


Of course, neither of these products are essential, but they're worth thinking about for the future. You can do a great deal with RC2 stuff without having to step up to the expensive Arca Swiss products.

David




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jrsforums
Goldmember
1,249 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Cary (Raleigh), NC, USA
     
Oct 21, 2005 08:17 as a reply to  @ lostdoggy's post |  #11

lostdoggy wrote:
...pan&tilt heads...usually have long handles...

I know you said "usually", but I thought I would point out this P&T head....with no long handles It is really light, packs small, and great for carrying when matched with a Feisol tripod. Comes with RC2 clamp...and not that expensive.

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …EG&addedTroughT​ype=search (external link)

John


John

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jrsforums
Goldmember
1,249 posts
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Cary (Raleigh), NC, USA
     
Oct 21, 2005 08:38 as a reply to  @ DavidW's post |  #12

DavidW wrote:
A Manfrotto 341 RC2 elbow bracket (external link) was delivered today...Leaving it on the camera all the time is really a bit cumbersome...though I wonder whether it would have been better designed to accept an RC2 plate on the camera rather than fixing directly to the camera....You can do a great deal with RC2 stuff without having to step up to the expensive Arca Swiss products.

David....I agree with you on the RC2. I use it on my 20D, with the RC2 plate always on my camera. My tripod has either the Bogen 3437(RC2) or 488RC2 on it, the monopod a 486RC2, and even my Bogen minipod has a RC2 miniball head on it. I recently got a Newton FR2 (folding flash rotator) bracket and had Robert Newton modify a RC2 QR clamp to use it on the base, so it now snaps on/off the camera quickly....a QR plate below it makes it easy to add the whole assembly to any of the pods. (I'll post pics if you are interested)

I agree with you on the 341RC2....suggest you get a QR clamp...add it to the elbow bracket...then snap to camera just when you need it. Having just an RC2 plate on the camera is much smaller and easier.

John


John

Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Oct 21, 2005 09:10 |  #13

If I'm allowed to hijack this thread for a moment then allowed to ask a super-silly question.

See, I've been hearing about "3-way panhead" and I know that there are heads that can do:
1- Forward & backward
2- Left & right

My question is, what's the 3rd way :o




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidW
Goldmember
3,165 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Bedfordshire, UK
     
Oct 21, 2005 09:17 |  #14

I do have a Manfrotto 323 (external link) QR adapter. I have a Gitzo G1275M offset ball head on a Gitzo G2220 Explorer tripod; the offset ball head, for which there's no Manfrotto equivalent, allows me to use the full flexibility of the Explorer, but I didn't think Gitzo's QR system made sense.

I felt there was a choice between RC2 and Arca Swiss, and RC2 won out on price alone.


I took the 323 adapter off my head and put it on the 341 bracket. The resulting setup works, but is imperfect. The 341's brass anti-twist arm no longer reaches the camera, and the whole setup is not as secure on the bracket as if the camera is fitted directly to the bracket - even with my grip on a 200PLARCH-14 anti-twist plate rather than an ordinary 200PL-14 plate.

I'd like to see Manfrotto produce a version of the 341 bracket that has an RC2 clamp built in. After all, most people using the bracket will have RC2 plates on everything already.


Do post pictures of the flash bracket - it sounds interesting. I'm spent up at the moment, having bought a Speedlite 580EX this week and Off Shoe Cord 2 this week, and I think my next purchase will probably be a circular polariser, but I am interested in a flash bracket.

David




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scottes
Trigger Man - POTN Retired
Avatar
12,842 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Nov 2003
Location: A Little North Of Boston, MA, USA
     
Oct 21, 2005 10:42 as a reply to  @ aam1234's post |  #15

aam1234 wrote:
If I'm allowed to hijack this thread for a moment then allowed to ask a super-silly question.

See, I've been hearing about "3-way panhead" and I know that there are heads that can do:
1- Forward & backward
2- Left & right

My question is, what's the 3rd way :o

Tilt forwards, backwards - looking at the ground or sky respectively.
Tilt left, right - like leveling the horizon.
Pan left, right - turning the camera to the left or right.


You can take my 100-400 L away when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Scottes' Rum Pages - Rum Reviews And Info (external link)
Follower of Fidget - Joined the cult of HAMSTTR©

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,037 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Tripod recomendations for XT -Differences in heads ??
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1111 guests, 123 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.