Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS News & Rumors Other Rumors and Predictions 
Thread started 07 Jul 2011 (Thursday) 10:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Bringing a digital camera on a plane kills pixels? Read more on PhotoRumors.com: htt

 
DoughnutPhoto
Senior Member
513 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 21
Joined Aug 2014
Location: the Netherlands
     
Jan 24, 2015 07:58 |  #46

Well, I've sent an SD card to space (on a student project). In such an environment, you do run the risk of data failure and other failures in the sorts of what is mentioned here. To be exact, in space you can expect impact of tiny particles at any random spot on your electronics and they can cause a short circuit. So you make systems 3x redundant.

On earth the risk is much lower. There are so many electronics on an airplane that we should've known the risks of gamma radiation by now. There is no radiation shielding, just EMC (electromagnetic) shielding on the electronics to protect from noise and inaccurate measurements.

Why would image sensors be extremely different from other precision electronics? Why don't we have our forums filled with complaints of deminished image quality from all the travel photographers?

On the other hand, film camera's do suffer from the x-ray scanners as it causes a color cast on the exposures. That's a whole different thing...


Canon 5d, 60d, 17-40mm L, 30mm Art, 50mm, 85mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
golfcharlie
Member
Avatar
108 posts
Likes: 343
Joined Nov 2014
Location: Europe
     
Aug 29, 2015 14:02 |  #47

Interesting dicussion.
I'm an airline pilot flying the Boeing 737, we're typically operating at altitudes of 34 to 41,000 feet.
I take my Canon 6D almost every day at work.
It goes through X-Ray scanners, suffers constant vibrations and (some) firm landings, changes in temperature and air pressure and receives - just like me - lots of radiations.
After about a year and 800 hours in the air, a mere 30 000 photos later it is still working perfectly with maybe 2 or 3 dead pixels.


Flickr www.flickr.com/golfcha​rlie232/ (external link)
6D | 5D Mark IV | Samyang 14 f2.8 | Samyang 20 f1.8 | Sigma 35 f1.4 A | Canon 85 f1.8 | Canon 135 f2 L
Tokina 10-17 Fisheye | 24-105 f4L IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS-Mike
Goldmember
Avatar
1,013 posts
Gallery: 25 photos
Likes: 199
Joined Oct 2013
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
     
Mar 30, 2016 10:21 |  #48

I don't have a problem flying with my camera, but it does add more soreness to my arms. ߘ


Sony A7 III
All my Canon gear is on sale here.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrblint
Listen! .... do you smell something?
Avatar
20,886 posts
Gallery: 38 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 1447
Joined May 2012
Location: U.S.A.
     
Mar 30, 2016 10:28 |  #49

Rim-shot.


Mark

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
iazybandit
Goldmember
2,094 posts
Likes: 52
Joined Apr 2011
Location: New York
Post edited over 2 years ago by iazybandit.
     
Apr 22, 2016 14:54 |  #50

"This is why all major manufacturers are shipping cameras by sea and this is considered an industry secret because of the fear of lawsuits."

LOL. Such a bunch of bull. Manufacturers ship via sea because they can ship bulk shipments in containers and its much cheaper. Try fitting that much amount into a plane with other shipments. Not to mention weight limitations.

So I guess photographers who travel should be taking boats to their locations? Or ship their gear 1 month before the shoot so that when they land, the gear would be waiting for them?

Don't bring your smartphone, tablets or laptops either on the plane.


Canon :: 5D Mark IV | EOS M5
Glass/Gear :: Canon 24-70L II | Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM | EF-M 22mm | EF-M 11-22
FULL GEAR LIST | FEEDBACK
FS: Varavon Monopod and Camtrol Prime Stabilizer | Tolifo LED Light, Luxi for All Light Meter, Ruggard Journey 34 Shoulder Bag

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

18,886 views & 2 likes for this thread
Bringing a digital camera on a plane kills pixels? Read more on PhotoRumors.com: htt
FORUMS News & Rumors Other Rumors and Predictions 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is RoydonsPhotography
438 guests, 365 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.