Jul 07, 2011 18:02 | #1 Just curious as to different opinions. Thank you.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Doug Sturgess
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Immaculens creeped by the TF....  More info | Jul 07, 2011 18:08 | #2 preference for #1. The 2nd one seems too blue in the shadows.... WB cooling?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jackirons Senior Member  344 posts Joined Apr 2008 More info | Jul 07, 2011 18:13 | #3 I only see one for some reason...I would bump up the sharpness and contrast though. https://www.flickr.com/photos/135044799@N03/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 07, 2011 18:14 | #4 Immaculens wrote in post #12721440  preference for #1. The 2nd one seems too blue in the shadows.... WB cooling? excellent comment. Thanks. Please take a look at the new image with the cyan toned down & let me know...1 or 2. Doug Sturgess
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Immaculens creeped by the TF.... More info | Jul 07, 2011 18:19 | #5 dougsturgess wrote in post #12721461 excellent comment. Thanks. Please take a look at the new image with the cyan toned down & let me know...1 or 2. I would prefer # 2 if there was a little more fill light - too much shadow 'and' dark coloration - but that color patern/marbeling is a little more striking in #2, IMO
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 07, 2011 18:26 | #6 Immaculens wrote in post #12721491 I would prefer # 2 if there was a little more fill light - too much shadow 'and' dark coloration - but that color patern/marbeling is a little more striking in #2, IMO Thanks. How does this look? Doug Sturgess
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Immaculens creeped by the TF.... More info | I think its improved from the previous edit
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 07, 2011 19:00 | #8 Immaculens wrote in post #12721598 I think its improved from the previous edit Thank you. Doug Sturgess
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Frugal Senior Member  784 posts Joined May 2009 Location: Northern CA More info | #1 b/c it leads my eyes down the steps, and that's what the image seems to be about. In #2 my eyes go straight to the enhanced area in the middle. Richard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Immaculens creeped by the TF.... More info | excellent point
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Woolburr Rest in peace old friend.  66,487 posts Gallery: 115 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 143 Joined Sep 2005 Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC! More info | Jul 07, 2011 19:48 | #11 #2....although it seems to have a glow to it. The first image looks pretty flat and lifeless. People that know me call me Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
elio79 Member 116 posts Joined Apr 2011 Location: Chicago, IL More info | Jul 07, 2011 20:46 | #12 #1. In 2 my eye goes right to the side of the stairs v. down the stairs in number 1.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mosconiac Member  119 posts Joined Sep 2006 Location: Eastern Iowa More info | Jul 08, 2011 14:49 | #14 Did you crop the photo on the left? If so, could you experiment with adding some back in to give the eye more "room" as it starts down the stairs? T2i, 18-55 IS, 55-250 IS, Marumi Super DHG CPL & ND8, Case Logic SLRC-202 Bag (I love this bag!)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Woodworker Goldmember 2,176 posts Joined Aug 2009 Location: East Midlands, England More info | Jul 08, 2011 15:27 | #15 dougsturgess wrote in post #12721461 excellent comment. Thanks. Please take a look at the new image with the cyan toned down & let me know...1 or 2. If you're going to edit and replace images in a thread, I do wish you'd do it in a new post, not replaace the originals, something which I find confusing. David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1236 guests, 118 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
