Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 07 Jul 2011 (Thursday) 20:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

my third post...

 
ONE30
I don't have a point!!!
Avatar
4,284 posts
Likes: 1560
Joined Mar 2011
Location: newYORK
     
Jul 07, 2011 20:44 |  #1

this will be my third post on this thread, the first two didn't do very well! let me know what you guys think with the focus, exposure, and anything else that would help me improve.

thanks

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Niccas9
Senior Member
Avatar
798 posts
Gallery: 30 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 140
Joined Jun 2011
Location: California
     
Jul 07, 2011 23:31 |  #2

Sharpness is good, but it looks like it is just a tad overexposed to my eye. Looking at the rock in the background along with the feathers on the chick's face and the large duck's side is where I gathered that from.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 07, 2011 23:37 |  #3

Its a little bit overexposed but not too badly. its pretty clear you took this in pretty hard ugly daylight. You can tell by the hard shadow below the larger duck and the flat color rendering. The reason for this is the contrast ratio, the difference between the brightest and darkest part of the scene is more than the camera can record. This photo would have been better taken later in the day when the light wasnt so strong. The only other thing I would mention is the composition is a bit of a problem. The larger duck is your primary subject and its posture and shape lead your eyes out of the frame. if you had framed the duck on the left side of the photo that same line would lead you into the photo. I know that you framed it to show both ducks, but the small duck doesnt balance it out enough to hold your eye.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ONE30
THREAD ­ STARTER
I don't have a point!!!
Avatar
4,284 posts
Likes: 1560
Joined Mar 2011
Location: newYORK
     
Jul 08, 2011 07:47 |  #4

thanks for participating, yes I did take these about 2 in the afternoon(worse time to take photos, now I know )

good point about framing the large duck on the left hand side to not lead the viewer towards out of the frame.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drvnbysound
Goldmember
3,316 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2009
     
Jul 08, 2011 07:50 |  #5

My only comment would be about the angle. Similar to when shooting flowers or kids... you always see them from this angle (and the same is said about animals). I think it would have been better composed if you were able to get closer to their level, rather than the 'from above' perspective.

Here is a video with some more info in shooting angles and perspective. http://kelbytv.com …tv/2011/06/09/e​pisode-77/ (external link)


I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
..::Gear Listing::.. --==Feedback==--
...A few umbrella brackets I own...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ONE30
THREAD ­ STARTER
I don't have a point!!!
Avatar
4,284 posts
Likes: 1560
Joined Mar 2011
Location: newYORK
     
Jul 08, 2011 09:02 |  #6

drvnbysound wrote in post #12724089 (external link)
My only comment would be about the angle. Similar to when shooting flowers or kids...
Here is a video with some more info in shooting angles and perspective. http://kelbytv.com …tv/2011/06/09/e​pisode-77/ (external link)

thanks for the informative link. Unfortunately, that was the lowest I could go without hopping over the wooden barrier, walking down the river slope and get an eye level shot of the duck! I do try to get at eye level most times or a bit lower as stated in video.

I do (most of the time)try to get eye level or lower. here is a picture where I actually got on my stomach to get the picture of the flower.

once again thanks

IMAGE: http://i1109.photobucket.com/albums/h433/shutter_dreams/museum/IMG_8895-1-1-1.jpg



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kechar
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
     
Jul 08, 2011 09:04 |  #7

^^^ WOW...I REALLY love that shot!!!

I think a portrait crop would work better.

Then HANG that baby on the WALL!!!


flickr (external link) KCharron.net (external link) - 5D mark III (gripped) | 24-70 2.8 VC | 85 1.8 | 50 1.4 | 70-200 2.8L
[LIGHTING: 3 Einsteins, AB400, CyberCommander, 2 VLMs w/2 spare bats, 2 64" PLMs, 24x32 softbox, 22" BD, grids and diffusers, Avenger stands and boom.]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmwphoto
Senior Member
Avatar
460 posts
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Richmond, Va
     
Jul 08, 2011 09:05 |  #8

that flower shot is well seen and taken.


Dave Watts
dmwphoto.smugmug.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ONE30
THREAD ­ STARTER
I don't have a point!!!
Avatar
4,284 posts
Likes: 1560
Joined Mar 2011
Location: newYORK
     
Jul 08, 2011 09:23 |  #9

Kechar wrote in post #12724394 (external link)
^^^ WOW...I REALLY love that shot!!!

thanks, i've read some of your posts, they're are very helpful, especially for people learning like me.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kechar
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
     
Jul 08, 2011 09:42 |  #10

Thanx man...this place has helped me a ton, and continues to do so.
I try to give back best I can.

The two closest blurred stems in that pictures almost frame the portrait crop. I could see this as one of those motivational posters about being different, beautiful, or standing out in a crowd!


flickr (external link) KCharron.net (external link) - 5D mark III (gripped) | 24-70 2.8 VC | 85 1.8 | 50 1.4 | 70-200 2.8L
[LIGHTING: 3 Einsteins, AB400, CyberCommander, 2 VLMs w/2 spare bats, 2 64" PLMs, 24x32 softbox, 22" BD, grids and diffusers, Avenger stands and boom.]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Jul 08, 2011 09:55 |  #11

gonzogolf wrote in post #12722840 (external link)
Its a little bit overexposed but not too badly. its pretty clear you took this in pretty hard ugly daylight. You can tell by the hard shadow below the larger duck and the flat color rendering. The reason for this is the contrast ratio, the difference between the brightest and darkest part of the scene is more than the camera can record. This photo would have been better taken later in the day when the light wasnt so strong. The only other thing I would mention is the composition is a bit of a problem. The larger duck is your primary subject and its posture and shape lead your eyes out of the frame. if you had framed the duck on the left side of the photo that same line would lead you into the photo. I know that you framed it to show both ducks, but the small duck doesnt balance it out enough to hold your eye.

Agree, you could just flip the photo?


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 08, 2011 09:58 |  #12

Flo wrote in post #12724651 (external link)
Agree, you could just flip the photo?

Then the duck would be looking outside the frame on the other side.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Flo
Gimmie Some Lovin
Avatar
44,987 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Nanaimo,B.C.
     
Jul 08, 2011 10:00 |  #13

gonzogolf wrote in post #12724665 (external link)
Then the duck would be looking outside the frame on the other side.

Lol, I know, but he would be lead duck then:p


you're a great friend, but if Zombies chase us, I am tripping you.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ONE30
THREAD ­ STARTER
I don't have a point!!!
Avatar
4,284 posts
Likes: 1560
Joined Mar 2011
Location: newYORK
     
Jul 08, 2011 10:20 as a reply to  @ Flo's post |  #14

...I am now more confused than ever on where to place the subject!

thanks for making it clear as mud :D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kechar
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
     
Jul 08, 2011 10:24 |  #15

Flo wrote in post #12724651 (external link)
Agree, you could just flip the photo?

I almost fell out of my chair!!!!!!!


flickr (external link) KCharron.net (external link) - 5D mark III (gripped) | 24-70 2.8 VC | 85 1.8 | 50 1.4 | 70-200 2.8L
[LIGHTING: 3 Einsteins, AB400, CyberCommander, 2 VLMs w/2 spare bats, 2 64" PLMs, 24x32 softbox, 22" BD, grids and diffusers, Avenger stands and boom.]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,596 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it and it is followed by 2 members.
my third post...
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1476 guests, 134 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.