C & C are very welcome.
1 Designed and decorated by my Brother
2 Home made by my Wife
3 The Groom Family - Mexican in Vietnamese traditional Long Dress. Yes, that is a big roasted pig at the end.
4 East meet West
5 Junior High Sweetheart
6
7
8
Autonomous Senior Member 720 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: NYC More info | Jul 10, 2011 08:23 | #2 the ring shots > the other pictures.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SuzyView Cream of the Crop More info | Jul 10, 2011 12:44 | #4 It looked like a great wedding! Two very distinctive cultures combined, how wonderful! I love the ring shots. How many carats are we talking? Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gerstoscar Member 60 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Dallas More info | those rings shots are incredible!!! congratulations! Canon Xs -Canon 70d - Lens Canon 18-55, Canon 55-200 , 18-135mm, 50mm 1.8 85mm 1.8 Flash : Canon 430EXII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Jul 10, 2011 16:33 | #6 Here's my take.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
suecassidy Goldmember 4,102 posts Likes: 37 Joined May 2007 Location: Huntington Beach California More info | Jul 10, 2011 16:35 | #7 stunning ring shots. really nice. Sue Cassidy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Autonomous Senior Member 720 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: NYC More info | Jul 10, 2011 18:28 | #8 nicksan wrote in post #12735318 Here's my take. #7: Nice ring shot. Looks slightly underexposed. Maybe adjust the WB to match the one below? #8: Another nice ring shot. Again, IMO, I think it's slightly underexposed. i don't think it's underexposed. i think it's perfect. if it gets adjusted a little brighter, some of the details in the ring would be shot IMHO.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Jul 10, 2011 19:24 | #9 Autonomous wrote in post #12735765 i don't think it's underexposed. i think it's perfect. if it gets adjusted a little brighter, some of the details in the ring would be shot IMHO. If it's perfect, then why does it need to get adjusted a little brighter?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Autonomous Senior Member 720 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: NYC More info | pshh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
nicksan Man I Like to Fart 24,738 posts Likes: 53 Joined Oct 2006 Location: NYC More info | Jul 10, 2011 19:33 | #11 Autonomous wrote in post #12736006 pshh ![]() well, i still like the original picture better because it made the ring "pop". your edit made the ring didn't really stand out ![]() It was literally a 2 minute edit. Of course you can adjust it accordingly and it's absolutely up to the person's taste, but the point being because of the difference in brightness between the ring and the background, exposing for the ring will cause the background to be underexposed, which is the case in this shot. Perhaps my edit was over the top to make a point, but the fact is IMHO, this particular photo looks underexposed. Yes, the ring is exposed well, but the rest isn't.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Tony.Ibarra Member 140 posts Joined Dec 2008 Location: A van, down by the river More info | Jul 10, 2011 22:48 | #12 I'm thinking a hybrid of the 2 rings shots (original & edited). More of a snooted flash look with a large vignette would show the color of the flowers, which would look great in a layout with the rest of the decor, while not losing the punch of the ring. 1Dmk3, 7D, 70-200 f/2.8, 50-500 f/4-6.3, 28 f/1.8, 50 f/1.8, 85 f/1.8, 430 EX II
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 11, 2011 20:21 | #13 Thanks Autonomous! Autonomous wrote in post #12733312 the ring shots > the other pictures. Thanks HQP! HQP wrote in post #12733512 Wow, those ring shots are spectacular! Thanks Suzy. It was a little Engagement not Wedding. I think the ring is about 1.2C SuzyView wrote in post #12734312 It looked like a great wedding! Two very distinctive cultures combined, how wonderful! I love the ring shots. How many carats are we talking? ![]() Thanks Gerstoscar! gerstoscar wrote in post #12734367 those rings shots are incredible!!! congratulations! Thanks Nick for your time! I will take note and will try to do better next time. nicksan wrote in post #12735318 Here's my take. #1: Not all that crazy about this one. Lighting isn't all that great either. #2: Decent shot. I would perhaps increase the contrast some more b/c it looks like the lighting washed out some of the pop. #3: Looks like a snap shot I think due to too much DOF. I could crop much tighter and get rid of that car on the right. Colors look off. #4: Again, looks like a snap shot due to too much DOF. I would again crop tighter. Lighting looks a little harsh. #5: Looks a tinge soft to my eyes. Not crazy about the spotty lighting for the background. They look underexposed and WB is off. #6: I like this very much. WB looks off though. #7: Nice ring shot. Looks slightly underexposed. Maybe adjust the WB to match the one below? #8: Another nice ring shot. Again, IMO, I think it's slightly underexposed. I think these are mixed. Some nice shots and some OK shots. That said, it looks like you covered the day well. Thanks Sue! FYI, I am still waiting for opportunity to work with you. suecassidy wrote in post #12735332 stunning ring shots. really nice. Thanks Tony! Tony.Ibarra wrote in post #12736860 I'm thinking a hybrid of the 2 rings shots (original & edited). More of a snooted flash look with a large vignette would show the color of the flowers, which would look great in a layout with the rest of the decor, while not losing the punch of the ring. Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SurfAndSand Member 94 posts Joined May 2011 More info | Jul 12, 2011 06:40 | #14 Permanent bannicksan wrote in post #12735998 If it's perfect, then why does it need to get adjusted a little brighter? ![]() The fact is you have 2 very contrasting elements in these photos. The nice and shiny/bright ring, and the rather darkish "background", which is underexposed by at least a stop and to me gives the images an overall subdued feeling. Here's a quick edit... ![]() I like the original better also. Some Canon cameras. Some Canon and Sigma glass. Speedlites, and a few other goodies.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 12, 2011 11:24 | #15 I like the original better as well... I think it is exposed perfectly for the situation.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1619 guests, 134 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||