Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
Thread started 11 Jul 2011 (Monday) 18:09
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

fill light

 
Playonpics.com
Senior Member
929 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Canada NS
     
Jul 11, 2011 18:09 |  #1

alright i'm plannign on doing a shot of a bride and grom off a dock water behind them, however with the sun to their backs / facing me. My question is when doing fill light i have 2 question

1) do need a defuser on still?
2) can i leave the flash pointing up (probably not since i'm not bouncing) and instead have it pointed at them... correct?

Using a 580exii


Canon 1D MarkIII | Canon 7D | 70-200mm F/2.8L | 24-70mm F/2.8L| 300mm F/2.8L IS | 50mm f/1.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye | 580EXII Flash | Computrekker | ThinkTank roller and beltsystem | Elinchrom (2) Dlites 4IT Canon Platinum CPS Member
www.playonpics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
edge100
Goldmember
1,920 posts
Likes: 16
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jul 11, 2011 18:31 |  #2

Playonpics.com wrote in post #12741589 (external link)
alright i'm plannign on doing a shot of a bride and grom off a dock water behind them, however with the sun to their backs / facing me. My question is when doing fill light i have 2 question

1) do need a defuser on still?
2) can i leave the flash pointing up (probably not since i'm not bouncing) and instead have it pointed at them... correct?

Using a 580exii

1. No. You never need a diffuser.
2. Unless you are intending to bounce off the clouds, then point it at them

Frankly, with the sun behind them, you might be ok using a large reflector for fill.


Street and editorial photography in Toronto, Canada (external link)
Mirrorless: Fujifilm X-Pro1
Film: Leica MP | Leica M2 | CV Nokton 35/1.4 | CV Nokton 40 f/1.4 | Leitz Summitar 50 f/2 | Canon 50 f/1.2 LTM | Mamiya 7 | Mamiya 80 f/4.0 | Mamiya 150 f/4.5 | Mamiya 43 f/4.5
How to get good colour from C-41 film scans (external link)

Digitizing film with a digital camera (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Jul 11, 2011 21:09 |  #3

I am allways using fill flash, as previously said by edge100 you don't need a defuser and don't shoot with your flash pointing up, the couple is in front of you not up you are wasting batteries.


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,666 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 694
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 11, 2011 21:22 |  #4

A reflector works better than a flash in this instance however you need an assistant to position it for you.


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ootsk
Goldmember
1,154 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jan 2002
     
Jul 11, 2011 23:42 |  #5

It depends on how much light you need, as to the size/power of the flash. For fill, you might get away with a reflector..to just bounce a little bit of light to them. It won't be enough for you to be able to darken the background much, if at all...so plan on the sky being fairly blown out. You can get a flash on full power and possibly get the background darker, but there's a lot of variables.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Jul 12, 2011 08:44 |  #6

I would use a slave flash, personally. It would look a whole lot better than an on-camera flash.

And I wouldn't use a reflector either. I hate those things. They can make people squint just as bad as facing them towards the sun itself. Some people are ok with it, and some people squint at the slightest hint of a constant light source.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EggWhiteS
Member
129 posts
Joined Apr 2010
     
Jul 12, 2011 09:37 |  #7

bnlearle wrote in post #12741608 (external link)
You'll be much better off if you can get a second 580 to use as a slave ;)

If your planning on using your 7D, it has built in slave with the popup flash. You could easily setup a stand and using the built in flash to trigger the flash with full TTL. Just be careful to have them pointing at each other since the sun may overpower the popup flash and interfere with communication.


Canon 7D, EF-S 17-55 IS, EF 70-200 IS F2.8MrkII, EF-S 18-55 IS, EF-S 55-250 IS, EF 50mm 1.2L, 580EX MrkII, YN460MrkII (x2), RF602

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,666 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 694
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 12, 2011 09:48 |  #8

picturecrazy wrote in post #12744754 (external link)
And I wouldn't use a reflector either. I hate those things. They can make people squint just as bad as facing them towards the sun itself. Some people are ok with it, and some people squint at the slightest hint of a constant light source.

You're doing it wrong. ;)


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
Avatar
8,565 posts
Likes: 780
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Alberta, CANADA
     
Jul 12, 2011 17:38 |  #9

jcolman wrote in post #12745118 (external link)
You're doing it wrong. ;)

If you want to be limited in the angles that you reflect the light, then that's fine. If you want full control, then it's quite limiting in the angles to keep them from squinting. Broad lighting helps with the squints but I hate it. I prefer to short light the bride. But placing a reflector to balance the skin with a sun behind them, you're gonna need an extremely reflective reflector very close to them, and it'll have to be as bright as the sky, which is really freakin' bright. If you are ok with overexposing or flat out blowing out the sky, then you can get away with a much more subdued reflector. The point is, I can use ANY angle of light I want at ANY power, balanced at ANY level with the background, with a flash small enough to fit in the palm of my hand. And it's doesn't cause havoc in the wind. I used to use reflectors at every wedding but flashes can just do so so much more.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photography (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographers (external link)
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographers (external link)
Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) |Instagram (external link) | Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,666 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 694
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 12, 2011 17:47 |  #10

picturecrazy wrote in post #12747671 (external link)
If you want to be limited in the angles that you reflect the light, then that's fine. If you want full control, then it's quite limiting in the angles to keep them from squinting. Broad lighting helps with the squints but I hate it. I prefer to short light the bride. But placing a reflector to balance the skin with a sun behind them, you're gonna need an extremely reflective reflector very close to them, and it'll have to be as bright as the sky, which is really freakin' bright. If you are ok with overexposing or flat out blowing out the sky, then you can get away with a much more subdued reflector. The point is, I can use ANY angle of light I want at ANY power, balanced at ANY level with the background, with a flash small enough to fit in the palm of my hand. And it's doesn't cause havoc in the wind. I used to use reflectors at every wedding but flashes can just do so so much more.


Don't get me wrong, I agree with you about using flashes. I rarely use a reflector at a wedding simply because of the unpredictability of the sun. But a reflector allows me to use any shutter speed/aperture combo that I want instead of being limited to sync speed or high speed sync with my 580EX's. Also, since a reflector is a "large light source" I can get a much softer light than simply using bare speedlights.

But each has their place. Some reflector shots below.

IMAGE: http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x148/jcolman_photo/courtney%20and%20paul/courtney-121.jpg

IMAGE: http://i182.photobucket.com/albums/x148/jcolman_photo/kims%20bridals/kim-113.jpg

www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Arman's ­ Photography
Senior Member
Avatar
663 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Milton, Ontario
     
Jul 12, 2011 18:50 |  #11

jcolman wrote in post #12747713 (external link)
Don't get me wrong, I agree with you about using flashes. I rarely use a reflector at a wedding simply because of the unpredictability of the sun. But a reflector allows me to use any shutter speed/aperture combo that I want instead of being limited to sync speed or high speed sync with my 580EX's. Also, since a reflector is a "large light source" I can get a much softer light than simply using bare speedlights.

But each has their place. Some reflector shots below.

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

Nice, I like the first one better,lighting is great but jacket color is perfect for the nice wooden structure, nice !


Toronto Wedding Photographer (external link)
Oakville Wedding photographer (external link)
Milton Wedding Photographer (external link)
2x5D MII gripped, 24-70mm f2.8 L, 70-200mm f2.8 II ISL, 580EXII,580EXII,2xYN56​5II ....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,666 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 694
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 12, 2011 19:14 |  #12

bnlearle wrote in post #12747996 (external link)
Telling Lloyd he's wrong about lighting is like telling Kobe he's wrong about basketball. I'm sure it's possible, but I doubt it ;)

Seriously, Lloyd's a lighting guru.

And that first shot you posted is great! I've used reflectors and loved them -- but I'm always too lazy to use them for weddings. And the squinting thing Lloyd points out (vis a vis angles)... that can be annoying to deal with.

_______________

San Diego Wedding Photographer (blog) (external link)
Twitter (external link) -- Facebook (external link)
the Raddest Photo Trip Ever!!! (external link)

Come on the next one Dec 1st-14th 2011!!!!!

I've only been lighting for 30 + years so I guess I can still learn a thing or two myself. ;)


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,666 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 694
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Jul 12, 2011 19:37 |  #13

bnlearle wrote in post #12748152 (external link)
No offense, but I never care how long people have been doing anything in photography. If anything, the longer people have been doing it (once you pass 10 years, or so), the more likely it is that they aren't talented at all, in my experiences. It's not necessarily the case, but I know so many incredible photographers who picked up their first camera AFTER the year 2000 and I know a very small handful of incredible photographers who picked one up over 20 years ago. In fact, I know a ton of terrible ones...

What I care about is consistency and work. Lloyd's lighting skills and consistency with his images/lighting are off the charts. You may be awesome, as well, (I really don't mean to imply that you're anything but ;)), but I haven't seen your weddings over the last 5 years like I have Lloyd's ;)

_______________

San Diego Wedding Photographer (blog) (external link)
Twitter (external link) -- Facebook (external link)
the Raddest Photo Trip Ever!!! (external link)

Come on the next one Dec 1st-14th 2011!!!!!

No worries. I spent most my career as a cinematographer/videog​rapher lighting everything from talking heads to large sets. Reflectors are like my right hand. I couldn't do without them. When I decided to shoot weddings about three years ago I had to "relearn" flash photography. A lot has changed since I first studied it at Brooks all those years ago. But now I love my strobes. I can't imagine shooting a wedding without a handful of them at my disposal.


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Playonpics.com
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
929 posts
Joined Jan 2008
Location: Canada NS
     
Jul 13, 2011 06:05 |  #14

ya a i'd rather not use a reflector, i was thinking of just setting up the 580 on a lighting stand and shooting it from there... i use 1/8 or so power i should be able to make it like as if it was a reflector correct? Am i best to use Manual? (don't think i have a choice with Elinchrom skyport triggers)


Canon 1D MarkIII | Canon 7D | 70-200mm F/2.8L | 24-70mm F/2.8L| 300mm F/2.8L IS | 50mm f/1.8 | 85mm f/1.8 | 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye | 580EXII Flash | Computrekker | ThinkTank roller and beltsystem | Elinchrom (2) Dlites 4IT Canon Platinum CPS Member
www.playonpics.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoMatte
Goldmember
Avatar
1,707 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 219
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Go Ducks!
     
Aug 28, 2011 02:37 |  #15

jcolman wrote in post #12747713 (external link)
Don't get me wrong, I agree with you about using flashes. I rarely use a reflector at a wedding simply because of the unpredictability of the sun. But a reflector allows me to use any shutter speed/aperture combo that I want instead of being limited to sync speed or high speed sync with my 580EX's. Also, since a reflector is a "large light source" I can get a much softer light than simply using bare speedlights.

But each has their place. Some reflector shots below.

QUOTED IMAGE

QUOTED IMAGE

Using HSS, you can use any combination of shutter speed/aperture you want; that's the point.


the site (external link)
the blog (external link)
Smugmug (external link)
My gear: Canon, Macintosh, Adobe

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,982 views & 0 likes for this thread, 9 members have posted to it.
fill light
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Weddings & Other Family Events 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is MWCarlsson
909 guests, 145 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.