so i had my Sigma 85 adjusted and just got it back today.
one question tho, am i suppose to get sharp images at 1.4?
because it still seems soft to me!
and at what aperture would the image be sharpest?
any ideas?
Dr.TC Member 38 posts Joined May 2011 More info | Jul 11, 2011 23:19 | #1 so i had my Sigma 85 adjusted and just got it back today.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
s2kennyc Senior Member 849 posts Likes: 249 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Southern CA More info | Jul 11, 2011 23:22 | #2 From my sampling of the lens, it should be pretty darn sharp wide open at F1.4. It only gets better from there. Perhaps post a sample image with EXIF data intact and we can tell you whether it looks ok or not? -Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
all images are focused at the word "phosforic" beside the dot
@ F2.2, 1/100, ISO 400
@ F2.8, 1/100, ISO 640
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Jul 12, 2011 20:07 | #4 Based on those I don''t see a problem. Why do you feel it is soft ? Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 12, 2011 20:26 | #5 i feel that it is soft when i am taking portraits. when i focus on the eyes, it is not SHARP SHARP.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Jul 12, 2011 20:32 | #6 Maybe it is your technique. If you are new to very fast lenses, they can expose problems in technique like locking focus and then swaying/leaning into the shot or other mannerisms before tripping the shutter. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
s2kennyc Senior Member 849 posts Likes: 249 Joined Aug 2009 Location: Southern CA More info | Jul 12, 2011 23:24 | #7 Those sample shots look fine to me. -Ken
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 12, 2011 23:50 | #8 focusing on eyes is hard, you'll often get the eyelash or the eyebrow which at 85mm F1.4 is more than enough to render the iris out of focus. IF you really want perfect focus on the eye each time, you'll likely need a studio like environment and manual focus in live view. Eyes are often too small to reliably grab. Please visit my Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KVNPhoto Goldmember 1,940 posts Joined Jun 2010 Location: Jakarta, Indonesia More info | Jul 13, 2011 06:03 | #9 Is it me or I couldn't see the difference in sharpness for the bottle test. All look pretty sharp to me. X-Pro1 + 18-55 f/2.8-4 OIS + 55-200 f/3.8-4.5 OIS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yogestee "my posts can be a little colourful" More info | Jul 13, 2011 06:28 | #10 Dr.TC wrote in post #12748446 i feel that it is soft when i am taking portraits. when i focus on the eyes, it is not SHARP SHARP. this is why i dont know how sharp would be normal... Look,, most lenses, even topshelf models aren't at their best wide open. Close them down a stop or two and things begin to heat up.. Jurgen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 13, 2011 07:33 | #11 im using a 5D mark2.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bohdank Cream of the Crop 14,060 posts Likes: 6 Joined Jan 2008 Location: Montreal, Canada More info | Jul 13, 2011 07:44 | #12 It's probably not camera shake but either, or both you and the subject (portrait), moving between getting focus and tripping the shutter. You have to be aware of your subject. If they move their head slightly, refocus. When you focus, just be conscious of your body. Don't move. Get comfortable with your shooting position and don't move. It might feel weird at first but it becomes second nature quite quickly. There really isn't a specific technique that I can recommend. You just have to do it. Bohdan - I may be, and probably am, completely wrong.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 13, 2011 08:39 | #13 those bottle shots are excellent. i don't think it could get much better.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
pulsar123 Goldmember More info | Jul 13, 2011 08:43 | #14 Which focusing are you using - "fast" (phase detection), or Live View "slow" (contrast detection)? I believe most of the times fast lenses appear to be soft is not because of poor/uncalibrated optics, but because the "fast" AF is not accurate enough (this can be adjusted using focus MA feature if your camera has it, or calibrated by SIgma). 6D (normal), 6D (full spectrum), Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, 135L, 70-200 f4L, 50mm f1.8 STM, Samyang 8mm fisheye, home studio, Fast Stacker
LOG IN TO REPLY |
yogestee "my posts can be a little colourful" More info | Jul 13, 2011 10:09 | #15 pulsar123 wrote in post #12750818 Which focusing are you using - "fast" (phase detection), or Live View "slow" (contrast detection)? I believe most of the times fast lenses appear to be soft is not because of poor/uncalibrated optics, but because the "fast" AF is not accurate enough (this can be adjusted using focus MA feature if your camera has it, or calibrated by SIgma). Here is the test: take the same shot of the bottle twice: once with fast AF, second time - with Live View AF (make sure you zoom in in Live view to the maximum). For both shots, use tripod, enable lockup of the mirror (in the camera menu), and use either wireless trigger or 10 seconds timer. Make sure there is plenty of light. Then pixel-peel at both shots - if the Live View shots look much sharper than the fast AF shot, you might have an issue with the AF calibration (or may be you didn't focus properly - try to do similar tests with other targets, to confirm). I disagree! Jurgen
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2694 guests, 140 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||