Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 14 Jul 2011 (Thursday) 16:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Ever Heard This Nikon vs Canon Topic?

 
Gizmo1137
Senior Member
Avatar
960 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
     
Jul 14, 2011 16:17 |  #1

I was speaking with a person today who use to shoot Nikon and now shoots with Canon. Although he prefers Canon to Nikon, he made a comment I have not heard before or experienced in my work (I am forced to shoot Nikon on my job) but prefer and have Canon gear for my freelance and personal work). He said with Canon he has to do more post processing than with Nikon to get what he is after. Just curious if others have heard this and/or any comments.


Best, Bruce

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Jul 14, 2011 16:21 |  #2

Its been reported that nikons crank up the sharpening and saturation in the standard settings. All you have to do is change picture style settings to do the same in a canon.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bsaber
I have no idea what's going on
Avatar
3,536 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
     
Jul 15, 2011 01:33 |  #3

It's the way Nikon and Canon engineers decided to process the images in the camera. Canon tends to have a more "let the photographer" decide attitude.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
macroimage
Goldmember
2,169 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2007
     
Jul 15, 2011 01:51 |  #4

It is probably due to Canon's "source oriented policy", for example:
http://support-th.canon-asia.com …nts/TH/EN/80003​53301.html (external link)


Photo Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Woodworker
Goldmember
2,176 posts
Joined Aug 2009
Location: East Midlands, England
     
Jul 15, 2011 07:06 |  #5

I'm happy with Canon - have been for years. I think a lot of people who either want to upgrade of change makes need to work on improving their technique.

David


David

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KVN ­ Photo
Goldmember
Avatar
1,940 posts
Joined Jun 2010
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
     
Jul 15, 2011 09:21 |  #6

I've heard the opposite thing so far, 'Nikon had better color and blah blah...'


X-Pro1 + 18-55 f/2.8-4 OIS + 55-200 f/3.8-4.5 OIS
TS-E 24 f/3.5L II + XF 35 f/1.4 + XF 56 f/1.2
Sony RX100 II + G12
Travel the world!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HappySnapper90
Cream of the Crop
5,145 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
     
Jul 15, 2011 10:51 |  #7

I often hear the opposite thing, that Canon RAW files require much less work than dealing with Nikon photos. To each their own.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ R
Goldmember
4,319 posts
Likes: 7
Joined May 2006
Location: 06478, CT
     
Jul 15, 2011 20:08 |  #8

gonzogolf wrote in post #12758934 (external link)
Its been reported that nikons crank up the sharpening and saturation in the standard settings. All you have to do is change picture style settings to do the same in a canon.

Do I understand this to mean that Nikon shooters need more help? ;)


Mike R
www.mikerubinphoto.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark1
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,725 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Maryland
     
Jul 15, 2011 20:52 |  #9

It may depend on the colors you are after. I have heard it said that Canon does better OOC for skintones. But Nikon loves landscape type of work. Much like Velvia colors are different than Kodachrome.


www.darkslisemag.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
v_lestat
Senior Member
462 posts
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA
     
Jul 16, 2011 10:19 |  #10

Mark1 wrote in post #12765955 (external link)
It may depend on the colors you are after. I have heard it said that Canon does better OOC for skintones. But Nikon loves landscape type of work. Much like Velvia colors are different than Kodachrome.

i will agree with the colors of nikon vs canon, but using custom style sets you can mimic numerous films and even the nikon color scheme.

i am always amazed at the lack of people using canon custom style sets. there are so many out there and if you search flickr for Kevin Wang you will see the master of custom styles.

i use numerous style sets that require no color/contrast/tone adjustments because they are near perfect out of the camera when shooting jpeg or using the canon software to process raw images.
its truly a shame that photoshop doesn't recognize custom styles in raw files.

about nikon vs canon sharpening.

i am not sure who or why someone said nikon is sharper when the fact is they are not and its been proven time and time again.

nikon is naturally soft, its why when you read reviews you must take into account that nikon images, jpeg or raw or 100% going to be softer because canon applies more sharpening.
read any legitimate review from anyone who knows what they are taling about and they will always remind readers that nikons default output is softer than nikon.

as for post processing times... that depends on what your doing but with my experience with nikon vs canon i will 10000% agree that there is less color/contrast/brightn​ess adjustments needed on nikon than canon.

but again, this 100% comes down to what are you trying to do to the image.
what is your goal.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,104 views & 0 likes for this thread, 10 members have posted to it.
Ever Heard This Nikon vs Canon Topic?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
880 guests, 128 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.