Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 15 Jul 2011 (Friday) 14:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Have a 7D, wish I still had my 1D. Am I mad?

 
footman
Senior Member
Avatar
258 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 180
Joined Dec 2006
Location: Camberley UK
     
Jul 15, 2011 14:56 |  #1

I had a 1D mark 2N for about a year and loved it to bits. Despite what people said about awkward handling I found it OK to use.
Then I had the hots for a 7D. Newer technology, greater pixel density and a host of features.
I use the 7D for BIF, tripod+gimbal for smaller birds and wildlife macro.

I have all EF lenses.

I've seen all the reviews that put the 7D ahead of the 1D Mark 3 on virtually all counts.

But...............ther​e is still something nagging at me about the 1D series. The physical feel of the body is so different, the 7D with a grip doesn't come anywhere near the 1D.

Whatever people say about the AF of the 7D being almost as good as the 1D if not equal, I can say, IMHO, it's not as good.

So, am I completely off my head in wanting to swap my 7D for a 1D Mk3?


My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ziffle
Goldmember
Avatar
1,896 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Big "D" - Texas
     
Jul 15, 2011 15:07 |  #2

who cares what other think.

You have the means ... swap cameras.
go shoot and enjoy life with a 1DmkIII.

end of story-see you-bye bye.

ps ... but you can share images you capture with said new camera. :D


_______________
Wedding Photog's rule ........... just not sure what???
--
Gear List ~ VIAweddingPhoto(DOT)co​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jdnan
Senior Member
Avatar
465 posts
Gallery: 99 photos
Likes: 784
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Fort Worth, TX area
     
Jul 15, 2011 16:08 |  #3

Most of the posts that I've seen of owners of both cameras put the MKIII ahead of the 7D for action shots. When I shoot my son's high school football, a 7D shooter is usually there shooting as well and I always have a much higher rate of keepers. It could be her camera settings & technique that is lacking, but so far, there hasn't been any comparison.


Jerry
Gear
Feedback
editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
johnf3f
Goldmember
Avatar
4,092 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 657
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Wales
     
Jul 15, 2011 16:19 |  #4

I do not own a 7d/1D2/1D3, however I asked the same question of another photographer a little while back. He said that he loved his 7D and that it was one of the finest cameras he had ever tried. I was a little suprised that, when an Otter cruised past, it was a 1D3 in his hand and the 7D was in his backpack! He simply said that it's a better camera and he prefers the pictures that the 1D3 gives. I do not have enough experience/use of these two cameras to judge the merits of one over the other but he had both bodies with him and chose the older (Pro) technology over pixels - food for thought?


Life is for living, cameras are to capture it (one day I will learn how!).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gotak
Senior Member
949 posts
Joined May 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Jul 15, 2011 16:31 |  #5

I think if possible why not get a 1d3 and try it out and then decide which one to keep?

So many posts from people saying they already reach for A camera and so many posts of people saying they'd reach for B camera. In the end is which one you want to use that's important.


http://bubble-trees.com/ (external link)
7D x2,, 50 f1.8, 11-16 f2.8, 17-55 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS II, 100 2.8L, 430EX, 580EX, Di866, pixel king wireless TTL trigger.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ThreeSixty
Member
64 posts
Joined Apr 2011
     
Jul 15, 2011 16:41 |  #6

Geez, you'd hope a $7,000 camera (1D mkIII ) would perform better than a $1,600 camera (7D).


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JHH ­ Photgraphy
Senior Member
Avatar
288 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: Morgantown, WV
     
Jul 15, 2011 16:46 |  #7

ThreeSixty wrote in post #12764869 (external link)
Geez, you'd hope a $7,000 camera (1D mkIII ) would perform better than a $1,600 camera (7D).


I agree with you ThreeSixty!


James
XTi, XT, EF 50mm f/1.8 II, EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 II, EF 24-70mm 2.8L USM, EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM, EF 70-200mm 2.8L IS USM, EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM, EF 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 USM, EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, EF1.4x ll, EF2x ll

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jase1125
Goldmember
Avatar
3,027 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 82
Joined May 2010
Location: Lewisville, TX (DFW)
     
Jul 15, 2011 17:06 |  #8

ThreeSixty wrote in post #12764869 (external link)
Geez, you'd hope a $7,000 camera (1D mkIII ) would perform better than a $1,600 camera (7D).

A 1d mark III isn't $7,000. You are thinking about a 1Ds Mark III.


Jason

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwcdds
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,738 posts
Gallery: 1929 photos
Best ofs: 8
Likes: 10185
Joined Aug 2004
Location: Santa Monica, CA
     
Jul 15, 2011 17:20 |  #9

jase1125 wrote in post #12764995 (external link)
A 1d mark III isn't $7,000. You are thinking about a 1Ds Mark III.

Just a mere $4,000 when new to the $1700 of 7D when new. But who's counting? ;)

Can't speak for the OP. But I can only imagine falling in love with the design/ergo/feel of a particular equipment and suddenly not liking going down to "inferior" gear.

But as someone noted... if the money's there, buy whatever makes you happy.


Julian
Gear/Feedbacks | SmugMug (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Blog (external link) | Instagram (external link) | YouTube (external link)
My Reviews | "The Mighty One" (external link) | "EF 85mm f/1.4 L IS Review" (external link)
Founding member and President of the BOGUS Photo Club (Blatantly-Over-Geared & Under-Skilled)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jhayesvw
Cream of the Crop
7,230 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Likes: 271
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
     
Jul 15, 2011 17:25 as a reply to  @ jwcdds's post |  #10

i think either one will take equally fine action shots given the same settings.

my friend chris has a 7d and had the opportunity to get a 1d3 and ended up not getting the 1d3. that doesnt make either camera better, its just an account of the 7d winning in this person's comparison.

personally I would take either.
with the 10mp how big could you print from the 1d3?



My Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
markol
Senior Member
841 posts
Joined Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
     
Jul 15, 2011 17:32 |  #11

The 1D is more of a pro camera, so you're not out of your mind at all. Rent one and see what you think; for BIF I'd prefer the 1D no question.


www.borrowlenses.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
butterfly2937
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,150 posts
Gallery: 378 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1477
Joined Apr 2009
Location: Connecticut USA
     
Jul 15, 2011 19:07 |  #12

I have a 1D4 and a 7D and I really like both cameras. Both do great for sports with the right settings.


_______________
flickr (external link)
GEAR

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeFairbanks
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jul 15, 2011 19:09 |  #13

People will argue, but the larger the sensor, the better the imaging. That's a fact.


Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
uOpt
Goldmember
Avatar
2,283 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Boston, MA, USA
     
Jul 15, 2011 19:23 |  #14

The 1d2 is annoying but it sure makes pretty pictures.


My imagine composition sucks. I need a heavier lens.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nich0145
Member
90 posts
Joined Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia
     
Jul 15, 2011 22:16 |  #15

I agree with you the 1d body feels so much nicer than a 7d, I've seen a lot of people complaining about the size of 1d but coming from Asia and traveling mostly in Asia, I've yet run into people who are... "uncomfortable?" "put off?" by my camera size? In my opinion I think they can't really differentiate them because dslr as a whole is still a rare sight (Except for the young hipster wearing their fancy beginner dslr around their neck and walk in the mall like its an fashion accessory).


Nicholas

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,108 views & 0 likes for this thread, 26 members have posted to it.
Have a 7D, wish I still had my 1D. Am I mad?
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1460 guests, 148 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.