Had some fun with my wife today and decided to give this one a edit what do you think?
 | HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR |
IMG_1231FINAL
by Bokehliciousss, on Flickr
Nickc84 Goldmember  2,064 posts Likes: 80 Joined Jul 2010 More info | Jul 17, 2011 17:13 | #1 Had some fun with my wife today and decided to give this one a edit what do you think?
IMG_1231FINAL by Bokehliciousss, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ni$mo350 Cream of the Crop  6,011 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Portland, OR More info | Jul 17, 2011 17:15 | #2 |
Jul 17, 2011 17:19 | #3 what would recommend to fix it? Using cs5... I have basic knowledge but no expert.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ni$mo350 Cream of the Crop 6,011 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Portland, OR More info | Jul 17, 2011 17:30 | #4 I use LR3 by lowering the purple saturation slider but in photoshop you can go to filter>lens correction or shift+ctrl+r and right next to the auto correction tab you'll see the custom tab. click on that and it'll give you sliders to work with to clean up red/green/blue fringe. Hope this helps. -Chris-Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 17, 2011 17:36 | #5 I did the Photoshop one but its not working. I saw a tutorial on you tube and it says if you crop the image already the CA correction wont work. Darn, I already edited and saved!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 17, 2011 20:07 | #6 hows this?
IMG_1231w by Bokehliciousss, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 18, 2011 09:04 | #7 I gave this one a edit too..  IMG_1229 by Bokehliciousss, on Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ni$mo350 Cream of the Crop 6,011 posts Likes: 14 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Portland, OR More info | Jul 18, 2011 13:15 | #8 Definitely better. I know it's hard to correct some of them and a lot of times you can't just fix it with a slider in Camera RAW or LR or whatever it is we use. Keep it up, looks good. The 2nd shows the EXIF at f/3.2 on the fifty where the CA isn't nearly as bad as it is wide open. It doesn't say the EXIF on the first shot though so I'm assuming that was shot wider am I correct? -Chris-Website
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 18, 2011 13:22 | #9 Thanks. The first shot was at f/3.2 also...I just got a lot closer. Yeah, I had to use the clone brush to get rid of some of the CA. Pretty happy with the way they came out for a 5 min portrait snap shot.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2902 guests, 175 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
