Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 18 Jul 2011 (Monday) 05:57
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Skyport triggering range outdoors.

 
belgianbob
Member
54 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Leicestershire, UK
     
Jul 18, 2011 05:57 |  #1

Morning all,

I've just got back from a weekend of shooting in the mountains, and I had a problem with my Skyports I wanted to share with you.

While they're fine for studio work in terms of their working triggering range - I haven't yet shot in a building big enough to give them any mis-fires - I found their range outdoors to be very weak indeed.

I was looking to recreate the classic 'glowing tent' shot, with a small lake reflecting sky in the foreground and dusky mountains in the distance. Sadly, I could only get maybe 25-30 feet from the tent before I was out of range, which was very disappointing. Having normally used them for close range work outside this came as a real shock. Fortunately, the shot was still good, but the experience was a wake-up call for me when planning future shoots of a similar nature.

So, does anyone know of any *EASY* mods to Skyports to increase their range?
(I don't want to buy PWs, as their extra size and bulk make them less desirable when carrying hiking packs etc, and I wouldn't use them indoors as I have BXri lights, so Skyports rule in the studio).


5D, 24-105L F4 IS, lots of old EOS bodies, manual bodies and lenses, Bronicas, Metz CL45s, many bulldog clips and gaffer tape, all stuffed into my 20 year old Billingham!
And then there's the Elinchroms...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dutchmen345
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: UK, London
     
Jul 18, 2011 06:15 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

There aren't an easy mods, they simply aren't as good as PW's are. If you want the range and reliability of the PW's you have no other choice then to get the PW's.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Jul 18, 2011 07:31 |  #3

belgianbob wrote in post #12777702 (external link)
Sadly, I could only get maybe 25-30 feet from the tent before I was out of range, which was very disappointing. Having normally used them for close range work outside this came as a real shock. Fortunately, the shot was still good, but the experience was a wake-up call for me when planning future shoots of a similar nature.

I have not had a need to use my Skyport Universal trigger system (I have six receivers and two transmitters) at long range, but I tested them shortly after I got them and found that I got reliable triggering at distances in excess of 200 feet outdoors. I have used them at distances up to 50 feet indoors several times.

It's possible that your batteries (transmitter, receiver, or both) were not fully charged when you found the 25-30 foot limitation.


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
belgianbob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
54 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Leicestershire, UK
     
Jul 19, 2011 15:30 |  #4

dutchmen345 wrote in post #12777733 (external link)
There aren't an easy mods, they simply aren't as good as PW's are. If you want the range and reliability of the PW's you have no other choice then to get the PW's.

Sure, I realise that PWs are *much* more powerful. But they'd sit in a cupboard for 49 weekends of the year, and would have cost me £400 for the privilege.
Hiring might be an option though. Will have to look into that.


5D, 24-105L F4 IS, lots of old EOS bodies, manual bodies and lenses, Bronicas, Metz CL45s, many bulldog clips and gaffer tape, all stuffed into my 20 year old Billingham!
And then there's the Elinchroms...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
belgianbob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
54 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Leicestershire, UK
     
Jul 19, 2011 15:34 |  #5

SkipD wrote in post #12777894 (external link)
I have not had a need to use my Skyport Universal trigger system (I have six receivers and two transmitters) at long range, but I tested them shortly after I got them and found that I got reliable triggering at distances in excess of 200 feet outdoors. I have used them at distances up to 50 feet indoors several times.

It's possible that your batteries (transmitter, receiver, or both) were not fully charged when you found the 25-30 foot limitation.

Hmmm... Maybe. The Tx battery was fresh, certainly, as I suspected this and swapped it for a spare on the spot (I always carry spares, I've learned the hard way.)
There was no way to confirm the condition of the Rx unit's battery, but it does get charged regularly, so I was fairly confident that it was ok. Like I say, it hasn't ever been a problem indoors. May spend a while checking with known full charge/new batteries and report back.
200 feet currently sounds unrealistic for my units, unfortunately.


5D, 24-105L F4 IS, lots of old EOS bodies, manual bodies and lenses, Bronicas, Metz CL45s, many bulldog clips and gaffer tape, all stuffed into my 20 year old Billingham!
And then there's the Elinchroms...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 178
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Jul 19, 2011 15:35 |  #6

One thing I've discovered with my Skyports: They do NOT work as reliably when the Rx is down low to the ground as they do when they're up on stands.

I did a shoot a while back where I had bare Speedlights sitting on the ground in their respective "feet" and I had all kinds of mis-fires. Once I moved on to some other stuff and got the Speedlights into modifiers and up on stands, everything worked much, much better.

Don't know if it's the signal propagation or if the Rx need 360-degree "vision" but something about being down low made them fail.


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aressem
Goldmember
Avatar
4,368 posts
Gallery: 39 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 529
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
     
Jul 19, 2011 17:31 |  #7

dutchmen345 wrote in post #12777733 (external link)
There aren't an easy mods, they simply aren't as good as PW's are. If you want the range and reliability of the PW's you have no other choice then to get the PW's.

Wrong. I have cybersyncs by PCB and I can honestly say I've tested them up to and over 100m (350 feet). They're bullet-proof!

EDIT: My friend has the RF-603's and the range on those work pretty damn well too. I'm thinking you must have a bad copy or the batteries were low. I'm curious to know what the issue was now. Keep us informed!


Ryan Mackay WEBSITE (external link) | FACEBOOK (external link) | GEAR LIST | Buy & Sell Feedback: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sigma ­ pi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,204 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jul 19, 2011 17:34 |  #8

Weird. I tested mine for distance and got pretty far. Let me find the post.


Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
http://www.flickr.com …6850267535/in/p​hotostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sigma ­ pi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,204 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jul 19, 2011 17:41 |  #9

https://photography-on-the.net …p=10735576&post​count=1814

there it is!

IMAGE: http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4117/4900523158_943d1e4121_b.jpg

Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
http://www.flickr.com …6850267535/in/p​hotostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sigma ­ pi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,204 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jul 19, 2011 17:46 |  #10

how old are your batteries?


Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
http://www.flickr.com …6850267535/in/p​hotostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dchen99
Senior Member
860 posts
Joined May 2006
Location: Illinois, USA
     
Jul 19, 2011 23:26 |  #11

I also find mine unreliable and disappointing outdoors (transmitter + built-in receiver in quadra) so I stick with PW for now.


www.flashonstudio.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dutchmen345
Member
Avatar
75 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: UK, London
     
Jul 20, 2011 01:24 |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

Aressem wrote in post #12787978 (external link)
Wrong. I have cybersyncs by PCB and I can honestly say I've tested them up to and over 100m (350 feet). They're bullet-proof!

No they are not, you know where the OP lives, you know what frequency the CST works at opposed to PW ?

You know which band is most prone to have interference in EU countries ?

Doesn't make much sense for anyone in EU to buy Paul C. BUFF gear.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
belgianbob
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
54 posts
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Leicestershire, UK
     
Jul 22, 2011 15:52 |  #13

Right, I'm back with data (well, some updates, anwyay.)
New battery in Tx unit: check.
FULLY charged battery in Rx unit: check.
Range with Rx at ground level: about 40 meters (120 feet for those of you in the US)
Range with Rx unit at waist height, sitting on top of the meter box by my front door: 100+ meters (I ran out of line of sight from my house!)
So, there's plenty to take away there: They don't work too well when the Rx unit is at ground level, but hitch it up a few feet and you're golden. It helps if the Tx unit is not being operated by a child, dwarf or someone lying in a dug-out as well.
Put both aerials up, or in the same plane and you make the whole thing 100% more reliable.
Fresh batteries are my friend ;-)a

As for the subject of interference, well I don't anticipate any in the highlands of Scotland, as I was one of only two humans within a 10 mile radius, so interference wasn't an issue in this case but I realise that would be a very different story in towns, factories, etc.

All told, I am now very happy with my Skyports and certainly won't be buying PWs in the near future. I think I'll spend that money on a graphic tablet! ;-)a


5D, 24-105L F4 IS, lots of old EOS bodies, manual bodies and lenses, Bronicas, Metz CL45s, many bulldog clips and gaffer tape, all stuffed into my 20 year old Billingham!
And then there's the Elinchroms...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sigma ­ pi
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,204 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Los Angeles
     
Jul 22, 2011 16:04 |  #14

belgianbob wrote in post #12805877 (external link)
Right, I'm back with data (well, some updates, anwyay.)
New battery in Tx unit: check.
FULLY charged battery in Rx unit: check.
Range with Rx at ground level: about 40 meters (120 feet for those of you in the US)
Range with Rx unit at waist height, sitting on top of the meter box by my front door: 100+ meters (I ran out of line of sight from my house!)
So, there's plenty to take away there: They don't work too well when the Rx unit is at ground level, but hitch it up a few feet and you're golden. It helps if the Tx unit is not being operated by a child, dwarf or someone lying in a dug-out as well.
Put both aerials up, or in the same plane and you make the whole thing 100% more reliable.
Fresh batteries are my friend ;-)a

As for the subject of interference, well I don't anticipate any in the highlands of Scotland, as I was one of only two humans within a 10 mile radius, so interference wasn't an issue in this case but I realise that would be a very different story in towns, factories, etc.

All told, I am now very happy with my Skyports and certainly won't be buying PWs in the near future. I think I'll spend that money on a graphic tablet! ;-)a

Glad to hear. I should mention that my strobe and transmitter were at the same level.


Don't try to confuse me with the facts, my mind is already made up.
http://www.flickr.com …6850267535/in/p​hotostream (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MT ­ Stringer
Goldmember
Avatar
4,652 posts
Likes: 6
Joined May 2006
Location: Channelview, Tx
     
Jul 22, 2011 16:06 |  #15

I used Skyports to trigger a remote camera at a high school baseball game and they worked very well. I was around third base area and the camera was a good 40 feet past first base aimed at the bag. 123 feet across the diamond plus about 10 feet and another 40 feet. the remote was on a tripod and the transmitter was in my main camera hot shoe.


MaxPreps Profile (external link)

My Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,169 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Skyport triggering range outdoors.
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is AlainPre
1790 guests, 166 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.