Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 20 Oct 2005 (Thursday) 21:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ISO 3200 - Why not all the time

 
dmwierz
Goldmember
Avatar
2,376 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Chicago Area, IL
     
Oct 20, 2005 21:00 |  #1

Is there any reason why I would disable the H 3200 ISO C-Fn 8 in my 20D?

Does anything bad happen when this option is turned on? If not, why is it an option?

Thanks,

Dennis


http://www.denniswierz​bicki.com (external link)
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/dmwierz (external link)

Dennis "
Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
richardho11
Senior Member
850 posts
Joined Jun 2005
     
Oct 20, 2005 21:03 |  #2
bannedPermanent ban

dmwierz wrote:
Is there any reason why I would disable the H 3200 ISO C-Fn 8 in my 20D?

Does anything bad happen when this option is turned on? If not, why is it an option?

Thanks,

Dennis

I left mine on all the time. Nothing will happen and its is not bad. I thnk its just a safety issue. The 20D has noticable noise at 3200 ISO, so you have an option of locking it out and not using it. Just in case you mistakenly turn the dial one notch over from 1600 to 3200. At least thats what I think.


https://photography-on-the.net …p?p=2962090&pos​tcount=534

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Oct 20, 2005 21:34 |  #3

It's off by default to stop dummies using a setting they shouldn't unless they mean to.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bullseye
Member
42 posts
Joined Apr 2005
     
Oct 20, 2005 21:53 |  #4

I stated in a thread here that I didn't understand what all the fuss was about because iso1600 worked fine for me. Even 3200, so why not use it if you need it? I learned my lesson though. :)

I've found that either can be used, and with minimal noise when the situation is right, but it's best to just avoid it unless absolutely necessary.


Canon 20D
BG-E2 grip -w- two 1500mah batt. from Power-2000
Lexar 80x 2GB CF card
28-135 USM IS lens
75-300 USM IS lens
500 mirror lens
420EX flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ACDCROCKS
321 123 33
Avatar
2,931 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: in your attic
     
Oct 20, 2005 21:53 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #5

I use it in emergencys, not all the time though, don't use it unless you have to, nice feature though, epsecially if you shoot High school Sports at night.:D


canon weight ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ghaleon109
Senior Member
Avatar
916 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Oct 20, 2005 21:57 |  #6

When you set it to 3200 it shows "H" under the ISO setting doesnt it?

I was playing with one at Best Buy the other day and when I went through the custom functions I think it just said something like "High ISO" ??? Is that 3200?


--Mike Hughes--
20D and a lens or two... :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ACDCROCKS
321 123 33
Avatar
2,931 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: in your attic
     
Oct 20, 2005 22:02 as a reply to  @ ghaleon109's post |  #7

yep.


canon weight ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ghaleon109
Senior Member
Avatar
916 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Oct 20, 2005 22:05 |  #8

Thanks :)


--Mike Hughes--
20D and a lens or two... :)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPete
I am immune
Avatar
4,256 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 101
Joined Oct 2003
Location: Flat Bush, Auckland, New Zealand
     
Oct 20, 2005 22:07 as a reply to  @ ghaleon109's post |  #9

I will say what has been said before about using high ISO, better to have a noisy image than no image at all! I'm all for high ISO, but only when I need it!


Peter Lowden.
EOS R6 and assorted glass

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ACDCROCKS
321 123 33
Avatar
2,931 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2005
Location: in your attic
     
Oct 20, 2005 22:11 as a reply to  @ FlyingPete's post |  #10

right, When I used Nikon, ISO 800 was terrible!!!!, Canon is like candy, sweet tasting, and awlays a joy to have.:D


canon weight ;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jim_T
Goldmember
Avatar
3,312 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Nov 2003
Location: Woodlands, MB, Canada
     
Oct 20, 2005 23:21 |  #11

Has anyone tried to correct an underxposed ISO3200 image at and then tried to sharpen the image to any degree.. If you have, you don't need to ask why NOT use ISO 3200 :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aam1234
Goldmember
Avatar
4,132 posts
Likes: 1
Joined May 2004
     
Oct 20, 2005 23:46 |  #12

It's because the 3200 was not approved by ISO (International Organization for Standardization). From what I understood it's not a real 3200, it's just iso 1600 on steroids (so to speak).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MattyB
Goldmember
Avatar
1,673 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 37
Joined May 2005
Location: Queenstown, NZ
     
Oct 21, 2005 03:08 |  #13

try shooting at 1600 or 3200 at night time with floodlights on the subject, and pitch black in the background
noise on my 300D with 1600ISO was disgusting!

noise removal software did a good job, but it kind of 'pasteled' the images, making them all blend that tiny bit.
the spray off the cars nos thingy looked creamy.

i now have the hack on my 300D, but i refuse to use 1600 or 3200 at night time. it's too noisey..


Matt Bennell
Camera: Canon EOS 80D DSLR Black
Extras: 18-55mm, 10-18mm, Tripod, ND8
Field: These days you'll likely be seeing plenty of Nature and Landscape posts :lol:
New Site In Progress -> bennell.co.nz (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Oct 21, 2005 03:39 |  #14

MattyB,

you might try using exposure compensation -1 or -2 for night shots, if you want a black night, and not a grey or 'pastel' one. I find that the problem with the 'pastel' night comes more from the camera trying to get an 18% grey image when it is in reality nowhere near that.

I use ISO 3200 if I have to ... and I also have kicked myself sometimes for using ISO 1600 in order to avoid high noise and then ending up with unsharp images that looked ok on the LCD display, but not on the PC.
You can correct ISO noise, but not motion blur :rolleyes:

Best regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmwierz
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
2,376 posts
Likes: 2
Joined May 2005
Location: Chicago Area, IL
     
Oct 21, 2005 04:08 as a reply to  @ Andy_T's post |  #15

Thanks for all the opinions. I think I'll leave it "on". I do shoot Friday night football under the lights and have been using my Rebel XT most of this year so it'll be good to have the 3200 available.

Dennis


http://www.denniswierz​bicki.com (external link)
http://www.sportsshoot​er.com/dmwierz (external link)

Dennis "
Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,853 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
ISO 3200 - Why not all the time
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1095 guests, 113 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.