Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 20 Oct 2005 (Thursday) 21:00
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

ISO 3200 - Why not all the time

 
BlueTit
Senior Member
Avatar
714 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Dublin, Ireland
     
Oct 21, 2005 10:29 |  #31

Andythaler, thanx for the link to imagenomic, just gave it a try and found it great, will have to play around with it a bit more. Back on topic, I always leave 3200 available, but I don't always remember to double check ISO setting from last shoot :( Working on that.


Daragh
Gear:


Some Photos: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/bluetit (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
52,922 posts
Gallery: 193 photos
Likes: 10114
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Oct 21, 2005 10:32 |  #32

I find it odd that use of the high 3200 ISO setting (and the low 50 ISO setting on some cameras) requires a seperate custom function to be enabled.

I understand the reasoning to be that in both cases the method used to create the effective film speed is differnet from the method used to achievw all the other settings,. and that because of this image quality is takes a much larger than the otherwise incremental hit one gets when switching from say,. 400 to 800.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 5
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Hannover Germany
     
Oct 21, 2005 11:08 |  #33

Matty,

again, Noiseware community edition ... 10 seconds.
(Open image/select 'night scene'/press 'go'/save)
On second one, suppression strength was increased.

A bit better.

Best regards,
Andy


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
René ­ Damkot
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
39,856 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2005
Location: enschede, netherlands
     
Oct 22, 2005 08:23 as a reply to  @ post 861394 |  #34

aam1234 wrote:
I guess nobody believes me :o

"It's because the 3200 was not approved by ISO (International Organization for Standardization). From what I understood it's not a real 3200, it's just iso 1600 on steroids (so to speak)."

Would you please explain that? What's the difference between H ('1600 on steroids') and 3200? Is it like a 'curved up' 1600?


"I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
Why Color Management.
Color Problems? Click here.
MySpace (external link)
Get Colormanaged (external link)
Twitter (external link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kennymc
Goldmember
Avatar
1,501 posts
Joined May 2003
Location: N.E coast of UK
     
Oct 22, 2005 12:25 as a reply to  @ René Damkot's post |  #35

Experiment at 3200 and 50 with the 5D...

Subject... Small candle in a green bowl filled with potpourri and a green vase filled with sand and pebbles in my bathroom by the light of the candle... I took the same image at ISO 50 and ISO 3200 then flipped on to create the image you see... They were both taken @ f/7.1, the one at ISO 50 took 20 seconds, the one at ISO 3200 took 0.3 seconds...

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


So why not use 3200... No post noise reduction processing...

www.kennymc.com (external link)
Equipment http://kennymc.com/Inf​ormation/equipment.htm​l (external link)
http://www.kennymc.com​/equipment.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mstshtml
Member
36 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Fayetteville, NY
     
Oct 22, 2005 20:46 as a reply to  @ post 861179 |  #36

yeah, I was at one of my friends shows and shooting with my 20d and i accidently had it on H 3200 i felt dumb because when i went and loaded the pics on my computer the noise was overwhelming. Its was a good lesson though...pay more attention to what your doing.
so it doesnt matter if it is on or off as far as i know because i left mine on all the time and that is just the issue.
-Steve


Canon 20D - BG-E2
Canon EF-S 17-85mm
Canon EF 200mm f/2.8L II USM
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,854 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
ISO 3200 - Why not all the time
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1095 guests, 113 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.