Heý folks what do you think
I made the picture without a trippod
winam
winam Goldmember 1,942 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jul 2010 Location: Shanghai, China More info | Jul 20, 2011 13:13 | #1 Heý folks what do you think Canon EOS 650D, Canon EOS 1000d, SIGMA DG 18-250m, Canon 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DLitton Senior Member 855 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Atlanta, Georgia More info | Jul 20, 2011 16:19 | #2 great shot for without a tripod! you can see a good bit of noise in it from using a high ISO I assume and a faster shutter, but the captures great! David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Phoenixkh a mere speck More info | Jul 20, 2011 16:26 | #3 beautiful.... but the watermark sort of detracts from the overall enjoyment. I don't have to worry about people stealing any of my photos.... I'm not that good. This might be why I don't understand prominent watermarks in the middle of a photo. Kim (the male variety) Canon 1DX2 | 1D IV | 16-35 f/4 IS | 24-105 f/4 IS | 100L IS macro | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II | 100-400Lii | 50 f/1.8 STM | Canon 1.4X III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
macroshooter1970 Cream of the Crop 7,494 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Arizona More info | Jul 20, 2011 16:33 | #4 Phoenixkh wrote in post #12793998 beautiful.... but the watermark sort of detracts from the overall enjoyment. I don't have to worry about people stealing any of my photos.... I'm not that good. This might be why I don't understand prominent watermarks in the middle of a photo. Learn to ignore watermarks, use your imagination, it's not really there.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thanks folks for your replies. I am gonna try it again in 2 weeks, will be back to Paris then. Canon EOS 650D, Canon EOS 1000d, SIGMA DG 18-250m, Canon 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 20, 2011 16:58 | #6 cool shot. great timing! Canon 7D w/ BG-E7 , Canon 50D w/ BG-E2n, Canon 5DMll, Tanron 17-50, Canon 70-200L 2.8, Canon EF-S 10-22mm, Canon EF 85mm, Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 20, 2011 17:01 | #7 oscarl62 wrote in post #12794168 cool shot. great timing! thanks Canon EOS 650D, Canon EOS 1000d, SIGMA DG 18-250m, Canon 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
macroshooter1970 Cream of the Crop 7,494 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jan 2007 Location: Arizona More info | Jul 20, 2011 17:18 | #8 when the lights are aglow are subjected to copyright laws, and fees for the right to publish must be paid to the SETE.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DLitton Senior Member 855 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2009 Location: Atlanta, Georgia More info | Jul 20, 2011 20:32 | #9 thats a pretty stupid copyright lol. oh well ! David
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 21, 2011 02:42 | #10 DLitton wrote in post #12795113 thats a pretty stupid copyright lol. oh well ! I know. Canon EOS 650D, Canon EOS 1000d, SIGMA DG 18-250m, Canon 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipSouza Cream of the Crop 26,204 posts Likes: 7 Joined Mar 2005 Location: The Left Coast in the Land of Fruits and Nuts More info | Jul 21, 2011 12:29 | #11 That is a spectacular image, thanks for sharing it. Well done being had held. The tower and its representations have long been in the public domain. However, a French court ruled, in June 1990, that a special lighting display on the tower in 1989, for the tower's 100th anniversary, was an "original visual creation" protected by copyright. The Court of Cassation, France's judicial court of last resort, upheld the ruling in March 1992.[38] The Société d'exploitation de la tour Eiffel (SETE) now considers any illumination of the tower to be under copyright.[39] As a result, it is no longer legal to publish contemporary photographs of the tower at night without permission in France and some other countries. The imposition of copyright has been controversial. The Director of Documentation for what was then the Société nouvelle d'exploitation de la tour Eiffel (SNTE), Stéphane Dieu, commented in January 2005, "It is really just a way to manage commercial use of the image, so that it isn't used in ways we don't approve." However, it also potentially has the effect of prohibiting tourist photographs of the tower at night from being published,[40] as well as hindering non-profit and semi-commercial publication of images of the tower. Besides, French doctrine and jurisprudence traditionally allow pictures incorporating a copyrighted work as long as their presence is incidental or accessory to the main represented subject,[41] a reasoning akin to the De minimis rule. Thus, SETE could not claim copyright on photographs of panoramas of Paris incorporating the lit tower. Truly an arrogant position that does not apply here. Bless the recently fallen and their family and friends.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 1670 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||