Should I sell my Sigma F2.8 70-200 & Sigma 150-500 f5.6 for this beast New Sigma 120-300mm? I will really miss the f2.8 70-200 if I do it. What do you guys think?
dcasi34 Member  45 posts Joined Nov 2010 More info | Jul 20, 2011 18:39 | #1 Should I sell my Sigma F2.8 70-200 & Sigma 150-500 f5.6 for this beast New Sigma 120-300mm? I will really miss the f2.8 70-200 if I do it. What do you guys think? Canon T2i Gripped| Canon 50 1.4| Canon 18-55 3.5-5.6| Canon 24-70 2.8| Sigma 70-200 2.8| Sigma 150-500 5-6.3| 580 EX|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 20, 2011 18:47 | #2 If you'll miss the 70-200 f2.8 then why sell it to get the 120-300?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
teixed Junior Member  26 posts Joined Mar 2011 Location: Sacramento More info | Jul 20, 2011 18:53 | #3 I have a Nikon version of the 120-300mm DG F/2.8. Its a very nice lens, and takes really nice pictures. However, since its F/2.8, its quite the beast! Definitely worth the weight though. With a 2x converter and the crop factor of your T2i you will be shooting 900mm at F5.6. Pretty nice reach. www.naturesphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 20, 2011 18:55 | #4 Actually, I shoot more at 300-400 when shooting surfing events. I was thinking of buying a TC 1.4 or 2.0 for the 120-300. 200 is way too short for this..so I'm using the 150-500 which is pretty slow. Canon T2i Gripped| Canon 50 1.4| Canon 18-55 3.5-5.6| Canon 24-70 2.8| Sigma 70-200 2.8| Sigma 150-500 5-6.3| 580 EX|
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is MWCarlsson 852 guests, 152 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
