Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 23 Jul 2011 (Saturday) 22:04
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Could use a hand with picking out some glass

 
crawf71
Mostly Lurking
17 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Columbus, Ohio
     
Jul 23, 2011 22:04 |  #1

Hello folks!

Order my 7d yesterday. While i'm not new to photography I could still use some advise.

What I like to shoot are my dogs, my child, some landscapes(vacations) and urban scenes. What I what to get into eventually is wildlife(birds, insects maybe some macro of flowers).

I will have $1500 budget for glass. I was thinking the sigma 17-70 2.8-4 for general use. And a 70-200 f4L for wildlife, dogs, etc.

So what are your opinions? Should I switch one of the lens out to other glass? Thanks

Chris


Chris
Gear: 7d 24-105L 70-200L f4 IS

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thestone11
Goldmember
Avatar
1,203 posts
Joined May 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
     
Jul 23, 2011 22:12 |  #2

I will start off with a walk around all purpose lens before jumping into any wide angle or telephoto lens! Since you have $1500 to play around, the 24-70mm F/2.8 L or the 24-105mm f/4 will be my pick!


Canon 5D MK II | Fuji X100 | Canon T2i | Canon 100mm macro f/2.8 | Canon 135L f/2 | Canon 50mm f/1.2 L | 17-40mm f/4 L | 24-70mm f/2.8 L | 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM |Canon 430EX II Flash X2 | Pocketwizard TT5 & TT1

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,642 posts
Likes: 132
Joined Dec 2010
     
Jul 23, 2011 22:30 |  #3

70-200 f4L is an excellent choice, add in the 100mm macro (non L) and you'll be good to go.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
amfoto1
Cream of the Crop
10,251 posts
Likes: 84
Joined Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, California
     
Jul 23, 2011 22:47 |  #4

Hi Chris,

And welcome to POTN...

They will be a bit more than you plan to spend, but I think I'd get the 17-55/2.8 and 70-200/4 (IS if you can stretch your budget a bit farther).

I suggest don't get a dedicated macro lens yet. You can use macro extension tubes on the 70-200 for a while. That will be just fine for flowers, smaller insects will be a little challenging though.

Later on, add a macro lens is you still want one... I'd suggest look at the new Tamron 60/2.0, since it has larger aperture than most and should double as a portrait lens better than most macro lenses.

You will find 70-200 not really going to be long enough for a lot of wildlife... especially smaller critters and birds. Start saving up for a 400mm or longer! An alternative to the 70-200 is the 100-400, but that would gobble up your entire lens budget and then some. Sigma 120-400 OS, 150-500 OS or 50-500 OS might be a more affordable alternatives. There are some reviews and comparisons on the Internet that lead me to believe these lenses are all pretty good.

It's water under the bridge since you've already ordered it, but I'd have gotten 60D and had $500-600 more to spend on lenses, personally.


Alan Myers (external link) "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
5DII, 7DII(x2), 7D(x2) & other cameras. 10-22mm, Tokina 12-24/4, 20/2.8, TS 24/3.5L, 24-70/2.8L, 28/1.8, 28-135 IS (x2), TS 45/2.8, 50/1.4, Tamron 60/2.0, 70-200/4L IS, 70-200/2.8 IS, 85/1.8, Tamron 90/2.5 Macro, 100/2.8 USM, 100-400L II, 135/2L, 180/3.5L, 300/4L IS (x2), 300/2.8L IS, 500/4L IS, EF 1.4X II, EF 2X II. Flashes, studio strobes & various access. - FLICKR (external link) - ZENFOLIO (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeandpuppies
Senior Member
Avatar
539 posts
Joined Apr 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
     
Jul 23, 2011 22:58 |  #5

+1 ^^^ Buy great glass before the body ... heck, if you can return that 7D for the 60D save the cash there and buy the glass; Glass is King.

Also agree ^^ with 70-200 not long enough for wildlife or even shooting pups. I'd suggest a 300F4 or 400F5.6 and then a 24-70 2.8 since they are selling so cheap these days with everyone thinking the new 24-70 is coming.


Thank You,
joeandpuppies

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

800 views & 0 likes for this thread
Could use a hand with picking out some glass
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is dneitz
871 guests, 261 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.