Of course but then again why do I gravitate towards VanGogh over Chagall?
Should that matter when judging or grading?
Should I let likes and dislikes influence?
What makes value in art?
Why do we get up in the morning?
What we like and dislike is cool and is part of what makes up who we are but should we let that influence what is realyl good or not? I say no. In fact there are many artist whose work I personally dislike but fully understand why their work is valid and considered great by others. If I apply the same judgements in how I evaluate a piece I like to something I may not personally like I can still make a judgement about how good the work is or isn't based on that criteria.
And if you are talking art I posted a great starting point in another thread and that visual language is how people have been creating and judging work for centuries. Its how artists communicate visually. And its an ongoing process. Some come by it extremely easily and naturally and others it takes time but its all part of the journey and an important part of the journey.
The more you learn, the more you see in others work and the more it starts showing up in your own work. You start finding that pieces that are easily read (immediate gratification) fade fast from what you consider good and the things that you might not of given much thought to at first, the more you learn. the more you see and the more that work becomes interesting.
Its kinda the same way with me and music too. The stuff I initially like, in many cases, wears off quickly and the deeper, more interesting work, seems to unfold itself to me over time and usually those things are my favorite pieces.





