Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 25 Jul 2011 (Monday) 11:40
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Process this RAW, $10 PayPal bounty to winner

 
UV254
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Jul 25, 2011 11:40 |  #1

Hi-

I can't seem to get this photo quite right... the skin tones are washed out, the image isn't very warm. I think part of the problem may be my ignorance of how to properly set Photoshop's color-space settings, but anyway's $10 PayPal to whoever sends me the best version of this image.

1) Download the RAW from here:
http://www.yousendit.c​om …ad/YTYvTkFoSU9l​cEkwTVE9PQ (external link)

2) Email a 1600-wide .jpg version to: bf2.uae [at] gmail.com by 1 August 2011

3) I PayPal $10 to winner

4) Winner emails full size .TIF to me


Please let me know if any questions, and thanks!


//** Edit 29 July 2011 - Updated download link for the RAW ** //


//** Edit 1 August 2011 - Submissions can be viewed and voted on here:

http://www.****com/s/K​L7PK9L (external link) Thanks!!! ** //


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrandonSi
Nevermind.. I'm silly.
Avatar
5,307 posts
Gallery: 62 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 146
Joined Sep 2004
Location: Chicago
     
Jul 25, 2011 12:53 |  #2

You've got mail!


[ www (external link)ยท flickr (external link)]

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
Jul 25, 2011 14:15 |  #3

Load it into Adobe Camera Raw and use the White Balance EyeDropper tool and then click anywhere on one of the greyish trees. Then you can also turn the Vibrance up a touch which should do the trick.


Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bryan ­ Conner
Member
50 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2010
Location: Ravensburg, Germany
     
Jul 25, 2011 14:53 |  #4

I would use the WB eyedropper and click on either the lady's black shirt, or one of her black earrings and choose the one you like the most. I would suggest applying the $10 towards a how to book on photoshop and/or raw processing. You know the old saying, "You can fix a man's raw file, but if you teach him how to process them own his own, he will enjoy photography for life."




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Higgs ­ Boson
Goldmember
1,958 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jan 2011
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Jul 25, 2011 15:03 |  #5

Bryan Conner wrote in post #12820051 (external link)
You know the old saying, "You can fix a man's raw file, but if you teach him how to process them own his own, he will enjoy photography for life."

I believe that is from the mouth of the lord.


A9 | 25 | 55 | 85 | 90 | 135

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
UV254
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
10 posts
Joined Feb 2007
     
Jul 25, 2011 15:33 as a reply to  @ Higgs Boson's post |  #6

Thanks for the comments and suggestions, and special thanks for the submissions thus far. :)

I do generally utilize Adobe Camera RAW, and in fact am already familiar with the white balance eyedropper tool. And yet, I never could get the colors to look natural. Like I said before, one thing I believe that I need to do is iron out color-space issues, because what I see in Camera RAW doesn't match how the image looks once I bring it up in Irfanview or Picasa. (Images that look vibrant and lovely in Camera RAW look dull and muted in Irfanview and Picasa, which makes me believe that there is a Adobe RGB vs. sRGB discontinuity that I don't have properly sorted.) That issue aside, this image is particularly troublesome for me, for some reason.

I have Scott Kelby's '7-Point System of Adobe Photoshop', and went through his usually great 7-steps on this image, but even still, something just wasn't right in the end! The lady and kids have fair skin, and combining that with yellow sunset light filtering through greenish trees... I give up. Time to call in the experts: you.

Thanks again to all -- this will be really interesting to see the variation in the results. I'll post the 'winner' on 1 August. And one note: there are no 'losers' in this contest... image preferences are subjective, of course, and some folks may submit something that looks perfectly great, but it's just not what I'm after.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
Jul 25, 2011 15:42 |  #7

UV254 wrote in post #12820316 (external link)
what I see in Camera RAW doesn't match how the image looks once I bring it up in Irfanview or Picasa. (Images that look vibrant and lovely in Camera RAW look dull and muted in Irfanview and Picasa, which makes me believe that there is a Adobe RGB vs. sRGB discontinuity that I don't have properly sorted.)

^ That could be very likely what the problems is. A Color Management issue between applications!

Have you tried Correcting the White balance and color with DPP? Probably a little more accurate for a Canon CR2 file.


Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
queenbee288
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,610 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Stanford, Ky
     
Jul 26, 2011 12:32 |  #8

My guess is that the photo was over exposed to begin with. When that happens it is almost impossible to get the color to look great. You may tweak it to look acceptable but proper exposure will get you the best starting point. I only know this because it has happened to me too many times LOL




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tkerr
Goldmember
Avatar
3,042 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Hubert, North Carolina, USA.
     
Jul 26, 2011 13:04 |  #9

queenbee288 wrote in post #12825849 (external link)
My guess is that the photo was over exposed to begin with. When that happens it is almost impossible to get the color to look great. You may tweak it to look acceptable but proper exposure will get you the best starting point. I only know this because it has happened to me too many times LOL

Take a look at the Histogram and it reveals the exposure is good. Not underexposed nor overexposed, neither clipping shadows or highlights.


HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.


I think it's just a matter of tweaking the WB and maybe the Vibrance a little.

Tim Kerr
Money Talks, But all I hear mine saying is, Goodbye!
F1, try it you'll like it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bheims
Senior Member
Avatar
387 posts
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Jul 26, 2011 13:27 |  #10

Email sent!


Gear: 5DMkII, 60D, 20D, 24-105L, 17-85, Rokinon 8mm, 50 1.8, Some lights n stuff
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
iadubber
Goldmember
1,453 posts
Likes: 21
Joined May 2009
Location: Dubuque, IA
     
Jul 26, 2011 15:00 |  #11

You have mail!


Buyer/Seller Feedback
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Jul 26, 2011 15:30 as a reply to  @ iadubber's post |  #12

All the corrections in the world aren't going to help if your color managed applications are using different profiles or if you are using non color managed apps.Picasa viewer makes automated adjustments when I open photos on my screen and it screws them all up often. Don't use it unless it's just to browse through images. If your screen is calibrated and you have photoshop setup for proper color management, trust what you see in photoshop and don't worry too much about it. If you don't have these things setup, then do so and you will find things much easier to deal with. You have to remember that any image you post online will likely look different on every other person's computer unless they are viewing it in a color managed and calibrated environment as well.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Elan22
Member
Avatar
137 posts
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
     
Jul 26, 2011 16:33 |  #13

Email Sent.


5DMkII | EF 24-105mm f/4L IS | EF 70-200mm f/4L IS | EF-S 17-85mm ISFor Sale | Speedlite 430 EX II | Manfrotto 190CXPRO4 & 498RC2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MikeFairbanks
Cream of the Crop
6,428 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jun 2009
     
Jul 26, 2011 16:36 |  #14

I made several and put them in a folder. This particular one makes you a San Diego Chargers fan.

I'll mail you the serious ones.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


For the record, if I win I want you to give an extra ten bucks at church, give it to charity, or buy a San Diego Chargers t-shirt.

Thank you. bw!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Stuart ­ Leslie
Senior Member
Avatar
611 posts
Joined Sep 2008
Location: New York
     
Jul 26, 2011 16:57 as a reply to  @ MikeFairbanks's post |  #15

Looks like it was over exposed a bit. Couple quick tweaks in Lightroom:

IMAGE: http://stushoots.smugmug.com/photos/i-shRbHqB/0/L/i-shRbHqB-L.jpg

Gear: Canon 5D III, 5D and 7D | 300 f/2.8L IS | 70-200 f/2.8L IS | 85 f/1.8 | 17-55 f/2.8 [COLOR=navy]| 24-105 f/4L | 10-22 | Zeiss 35 f/2 | TS-E 24II | Alienbees
SmugMug Gallery (external link)
Model Mayhem (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,881 views & 0 likes for this thread, 44 members have posted to it.
Process this RAW, $10 PayPal bounty to winner
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1542 guests, 117 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.