i'm done w/ this thread
JOSX2 Senior Member 627 posts Likes: 4 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Mebane, NC (meh-ben) More info | Jul 27, 2011 17:19 | #31 i'm done w/ this thread website: Jim O'Sullivan Photography
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | GemmaLouise wrote in post #12833456 Thank you so much to you guys who have tried your best to help me with this problem, its appreciated! I returned the camera, as even if it was a case of me just having to zoom in its not really appropriate for self taking of pictures when out with friends. I was told by the person in the store that its possible the fact its 14 mp and my older one is 10 mp and appeared fine could be the problem, that the 14 mp pictures would look different on the computer screen in comparison.... Still I don't think it was right, the photos reminded me of when in a fairground fun house mirror! PEBKAC. The camera shop person is wrong too. Given how little information you gave us helping you was pretty much impossible. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crn3371 Cream of the Crop 7,198 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: SoCal, USA More info | Jul 27, 2011 18:42 | #33 tim wrote in post #12833996 PEBKAC. The camera shop person is wrong too. Given how little information you gave us helping you was pretty much impossible. Totally agree.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Jul 28, 2011 06:13 | #34 It's not the camera. It's your screen. (Which explains why you don't see it on the camera lcd) "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jasonlitka Senior Member 900 posts Joined Mar 2008 Location: Exton, PA More info | Jul 28, 2011 11:01 | #35 René Damkot wrote in post #12836453 It's not the camera. It's your screen. (Which explains why you don't see it on the camera lcd) Set it to native resolution. A Dell 2007 for instance, that would be 1600x1200 pixels. On another (16:9) it might be 1600 x 900 Certainly not 1280x768: That's a 5:3 ratio. Most 20" screens are either 16:9, 16:10 or (old) 4:3. 1280x768 used to be used on 19" screens, like this one: http://www.shopping.com …t-Adjustable-Stand/prices Just came here to say that. Jason Litka | Philadelphia-Area Tech Executive/Consultant
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 28, 2011 12:51 | #36 Im planning on getting a Canon 12 mp camera in replacement over the weekend so Im hoping I don't have the problem again, but I will definatly take your advice into consideration...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 28, 2011 13:13 | #37 René Damkot wrote in post #12836453 It's not the camera. It's your screen. (Which explains why you don't see it on the camera lcd) Set it to native resolution. A Dell 2007 for instance, that would be 1600x1200 pixels. On another (16:9) it might be 1600 x 900 Certainly not 1280x768: That's a 5:3 ratio. Most 20" screens are either 16:9, 16:10 or (old) 4:3. 1280x768 used to be used on 19" screens, like this one: http://www.shopping.com …t-Adjustable-Stand/prices Ours was purchased Feb 2008 and is a Dell monitor... However on clicking on the display settings im not able to set it 1600 x 900... Or 1600 x 1200. Theres a higher one than that but it doesn't work.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crn3371 Cream of the Crop 7,198 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: SoCal, USA More info | Jul 28, 2011 13:19 | #38 Wait until you get your new camera and see if you even have the problem.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 28, 2011 13:26 | #39 Yeah I guess so. The Samsung S1065 10MP shows images in true form (fine) on the computer so hopefully the Canon will be fine.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jul 28, 2011 16:13 | #40 René Damkot wrote in post #12836453 It's not the camera. It's your screen. (Which explains why you don't see it on the camera lcd) Set it to native resolution. A Dell 2007 for instance, that would be 1600x1200 pixels. On another (16:9) it might be 1600 x 900 Certainly not 1280x768: That's a 5:3 ratio. Most 20" screens are either 16:9, 16:10 or (old) 4:3. 1280x768 used to be used on 19" screens, like this one: http://www.shopping.com …t-Adjustable-Stand/prices Three people already told her that, but the PEBKAC inertia was too difficult to overcome. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RenéDamkot Cream of the Crop 39,856 posts Likes: 8 Joined Feb 2005 Location: enschede, netherlands More info | Jul 29, 2011 07:38 | #41 GemmaLouise wrote in post #12838193 a Dell monitor... Theres a higher one than that but it doesn't work. What Dell? crn3371 wrote in post #12838240 Wait until you get your new camera and see if you even have the problem. Yes, she probably will. "I think the idea of art kills creativity" - Douglas Adams
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Ok, new camera... Same problem. It must be the monitor...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
crn3371 Cream of the Crop 7,198 posts Likes: 2 Joined Mar 2005 Location: SoCal, USA More info | Aug 01, 2011 10:10 | #43 A quick search shows the max resolution of your monitor to be 1680x1050. Try setting it to that.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PixelMagic Cream of the Crop 5,546 posts Likes: 6 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Racine, WI More info | Aug 01, 2011 10:14 | #44 |
Aug 01, 2011 10:22 | #45 It hasn't changed anything im afraid.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 2126 guests, 96 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||