Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
Thread started 26 Jul 2011 (Tuesday) 16:56
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

I've never known a camera do this?

 
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Aug 01, 2011 10:29 |  #46

Just to be sure (before I give up), does this happen with all shots, or only when you hold the camera at arms length for self portraits?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Aug 01, 2011 10:38 |  #47

What version of the monitor drivers are you using?

If you can't see the native resolution you probably need to update your drivers.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kirkt
Cream of the Crop
6,602 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 1556
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
     
Aug 01, 2011 10:41 |  #48

Wow.

1) Post an image that exhibits the problem you are having.
2) List or post a screen shot of the display settings you are using and the specific model of display and video card you have installed.

Otherwise, there is no way to resolve the issue unless purely by chance.

Kirk


Kirk
---
images: http://kirkt.smugmug.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GemmaLouise
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
32 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Aug 01, 2011 11:25 |  #49

No the problem is mainly with outdoor shots, including people. The native resolution? Is that the resolution im currently using? Thats 1280 x 768 which I find to be the best display to use as nothing is blurred (picture wise). The video card is 'ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT'.

I'll get some pictures up soon.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Aug 01, 2011 11:35 |  #50

The manual for the Dell SP2008WFP (external link) says the optimal resolution is 1680 x1050.

It also says that if the user is unable to set it to 1680 x 1050 they need to update the drivers.

Rene Damkot provided this answer several days ago yet you continue to ignore this advice.

Oh well, I'll just sit back and laugh.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GemmaLouise
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
32 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Aug 01, 2011 15:21 |  #51

No I did take the advice, Like I said, I did change it to this resolution but it did not change anything! I took the same photos today on an older camera and that does not have this problem. Another thing i've today realised on the new camera, is that the problem only seems to occur when taking from over a meter away from the subject in the daylight (outside). When I self took photos, they seemed fine! Im using Windows Vista.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PixelMagic
Cream of the Crop
5,546 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Nov 2007
Location: Racine, WI
     
Aug 01, 2011 15:28 |  #52

GemmaLouise wrote in post #12858912 (external link)
No I did take the advice, Like I said, I did change it to this resolution but it did not change anything! I took the same photos today on an older camera and that does not have this problem. Another thing i've today realised on the new camera, is that the problem only seems to occur when taking from over a meter away from the subject in the daylight (outside). When I self took photos, they seemed fine! Im using Windows Vista.

Actually this is what you said earlier:

Ok, new camera... Same problem. It must be the monitor...

The monitor is A Dell SP2008WFP and it is 20 inches.
The highest Desktop Area setting iam able to have is 1680 x 768 on the ATi Catalyst Control Centre settings.

Im getting fed up of this issue... Please help me resolve this!

The recurring suggestion is to set your monitor to its native resolution of 1680 x 1050; there's no evidence that you've done that yet.

Anyway, I'm out. Good luck.


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Aug 01, 2011 15:37 |  #53

You really need to post an example of what you're referring to because something's getting lost in translation. If it was your monitor I would think it would do it with any camera, and with every shot. And at least do what many people have been trying to tell you. Set your monitor to it's native resolution of 1680x1050 so as to at least rule out a monitor issue.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GemmaLouise
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
32 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Aug 01, 2011 16:00 |  #54

Here are a few examples:

IMAGE: http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/n572/xgemma1990x/bax3.png

IMAGE: http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/n572/xgemma1990x/bax1.png

IMAGE: http://i1140.photobucket.com/albums/n572/xgemma1990x/ea50d3c5.png

The heads look strange compared to the bodies.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Outlaw
Goldmember
Avatar
1,213 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: central PA
     
Aug 01, 2011 16:23 as a reply to  @ GemmaLouise's post |  #55

looks like mild distortion from wide angle


Nothing to see here....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GemmaLouise
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
32 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Aug 01, 2011 16:26 |  #56

So any ideas of how to correct this? Seems strange considering the older camera is absolutely fine.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Outlaw
Goldmember
Avatar
1,213 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2007
Location: central PA
     
Aug 01, 2011 16:35 as a reply to  @ GemmaLouise's post |  #57

use the zoom feature instead of getting so close


Nothing to see here....

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Aug 01, 2011 16:38 |  #58

I can't see the pictures so it could just be wide angle distortion.

If it's not my advice at this point is you need to get a friend who understands at least the basics about computers to come fix it for you. I'm almost certain it's a trivial issue, but you don't know enough about computers to fix it or even give us the information we need to help you fix it. That's not an insult, that's just how it seems, not everyone understands computers.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GemmaLouise
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
32 posts
Joined Jul 2011
     
Aug 01, 2011 16:49 |  #59

Could it be that the Samsung S1065 doesn't have a wide angle feature (but does have a zoom button) and the Samsung ES9 does? This is why im noticing a difference in the two ie: one taking photos distorted and the other not?

So with a camera with a wide angle feature do you have to try and get as far as possible and zoom in? Doesn't that lower the quality of the final image though further away?

And Tim, your right about that. Im totally clueless when it comes to the technical side of computers!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
7,198 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2005
Location: SoCal, USA
     
Aug 01, 2011 16:50 |  #60

The Outlaw wrote in post #12859288 (external link)
use the zoom feature instead of getting so close

This




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

6,491 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
I've never known a camera do this?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Computers 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1625 guests, 100 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.